I might have to grow my, sorry, some hair for that!:D
Thanks Tony, that’s been on the boil for months, glad it has come to fruition though. The company have taken advantage of financial incentives from the Welsh government under the business development areas scheme.
We’ve also had an airliner storage and reclamation business (ECube) start earlier in the year.
Thanks Tony, that’s been on the boil for months, glad it has come to fruition though. The company have taken advantage of financial incentives from the Welsh government under the business development areas scheme.
We’ve also had an airliner storage and reclamation business (ECube) start earlier in the year.
‘KH’ doesn’t necessaily mean Kelvin & Hughes though, 26BU is for Gannet but doesn’t bear any relationship to the name, well apart from Bl++dy Ugly!
I wonder if the ’24’ bit denotes that it is aviation related (along with 6A) but not actualy an aircraft componant.
The parts list thread is here, but doesn’t seem to cover this ref, http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=105854
I asked around, but no one recognised it unfortunately.
However it was said that NIV doesn’t necessarily mean that it isn’t an aircraft part, just that it didn’t recieve a full 6A stores ref number (not that unusual)24KH1 should lead you to what it came from, but I’ve drawn a blank with it.
Thanks all for today though!
I’ll be catching up with DM at the Cobham Hall, so will ask him and check the system they have in store there if at all possible.
Another thought, I wonder if the catapult operator had such instrumentaion?
I will be there tomorrow as it happens, will try and print off your pic and ask around.
Must admit I didn’t know that about NIV either.
Lovely looking item Ian, I was initially thinking like TT and wondering if part of mirror landing system, however 6A is normally Aircraft Instruments.
Wondering if it could be rotary main, or a standby for crewman/diver etc?
Its a shame nothing has come of it,the westland wallacewapiti is one of my favorite large biplanes.May be one day some one will continue with it or start a new build replica.
Don’t forget the RAFM example at Hendon which was restored by Skysport and used as a guide to the restoration of the discussed example.
The Wapiti is a major type missing from British preservation, without a doubt.
I remember that, but weren’t the cockpits and major sections still there?
We sure this isn’t an arty wind up or statment?
I thought the major componants of the SHar and Jag were taken to and displayed at Slimes in Islington.
Also surprised that you can get that many ‘clean’ alloy ingots from a modern airframe.
I think my point is that here is an unusual and expensive opportunity to have really nailed the colours or even changed the scheme of ‘558 which has always provoked debate.
I just hope that with the ‘The Spirit of Great Britain’ titling that this isn’t to keep the 2012 Olympic organisers happy rather than the celebration of 60 years of the Vulcan or 30 years since ithe types most renowned actions in the Falklands.
XL426 seems to have been in a darker grey camo when in wraparound, but faded, compare with standard bomber/K.2 scheme here, http://www.avrovulcan.org.uk/tankers/pair.htm
That sounds about right Roobarb, apparently that was the only grey available to the RAFs VHT when it was pianted at Kinloss.
Must admit I didn’t realise that MSG was used on that scheme until Sven pointed it out.
Anyway, tounge is firmly in cheek now!
As I say, sadly, for now all this is just a paperwork exercise in an attempt to sort the mess out, and at least put some of the myths and stories regarding the whole thing to rest.
Which is definitely worth doing and a step forward:)
And that is just the AEW period, even as MR.2s they were begining to struggle with the increasing weights and longevity of service – still did better than the Mk.3s!