dark light

ZRX61

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 4,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bl00dy Garages…. #1856649
    ZRX61
    Member

    You’re not paying for what they do, you’re paying for what they know.. that the average punter doesn’t….

    in reply to: General Discussion #258432
    ZRX61
    Member

    https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/535734_339248209518730_64167568_n.jpg

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1856684
    ZRX61
    Member

    https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/535734_339248209518730_64167568_n.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #258682
    ZRX61
    Member

    Don’t forget the looting after hurricanes & earthquakes. I lived in Northridge in ’94 (1 miles from the building collapse where lots of people died) & there was no looting in my neighbourhood owing to everyone being camped out in their front yards armed to the teeth.

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1857002
    ZRX61
    Member

    Don’t forget the looting after hurricanes & earthquakes. I lived in Northridge in ’94 (1 miles from the building collapse where lots of people died) & there was no looting in my neighbourhood owing to everyone being camped out in their front yards armed to the teeth.

    in reply to: First hint of new WW2 mini-series from HBO.. #1003434
    ZRX61
    Member

    time for the fighters

    They already did, apparently they released the same film under 2 names: Tuskegee Airmen (?) & Red Tails. I’ve seen both films & couldn’t tell them apart.

    in reply to: IGN B17's video #1003445
    ZRX61
    Member

    Kinda ironic that Sally B is shown without engines…

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #1003450
    ZRX61
    Member

    Here are some aircraft with Patina:

    ;):diablo:

    in reply to: USAF Vietnam veteran Ed Rasimus passes #1003462
    ZRX61
    Member

    Christina Olds posted on FB that he passed on Jan 30th.

    https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/221904_4314074371607_1379354141_n.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #259412
    ZRX61
    Member

    But you’ll concede that the ‘Gun Facts’ website has an agenda; it may just ‘collate’ data from other sources but it is deliberately making an argument against gun-control.

    I spent a long time reading the ‘Gun Facts’ site last night and while I cannot contradict any of the figures it was clear that some of the figures were years out of date and possibly do not accurately reflect the current situation.

    Some of the facts also seemed to contradict facts that you yourself had used to support your argument.

    Coming back to this post. Gun Facts is more about showing the figures & reports spewed by the antis to be mainly pulled out of thin air or their exhaust port.

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1857746
    ZRX61
    Member

    But you’ll concede that the ‘Gun Facts’ website has an agenda; it may just ‘collate’ data from other sources but it is deliberately making an argument against gun-control.

    I spent a long time reading the ‘Gun Facts’ site last night and while I cannot contradict any of the figures it was clear that some of the figures were years out of date and possibly do not accurately reflect the current situation.

    Some of the facts also seemed to contradict facts that you yourself had used to support your argument.

    Coming back to this post. Gun Facts is more about showing the figures & reports spewed by the antis to be mainly pulled out of thin air or their exhaust port.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259480
    ZRX61
    Member

    That is odd.
    Then you seem to not have very large interest in firearms as it has just as much information as any news-stand magazine and far more on historical fire-arms than the average news-stand magazine.

    I only buy one magazine each month & that’s FlyPast. I rarely buy gun magazines unless I spot something on the cover that pertains to WWII rifles, S&W M&P pistols or Mossberg 590 shotguns. I’m more liable to buy a DIY mag. I used to buy Warbird Digest, but they went to subscription only & I can’t be arsed to fill out the paperwork for that.

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1857767
    ZRX61
    Member

    That is odd.
    Then you seem to not have very large interest in firearms as it has just as much information as any news-stand magazine and far more on historical fire-arms than the average news-stand magazine.

    I only buy one magazine each month & that’s FlyPast. I rarely buy gun magazines unless I spot something on the cover that pertains to WWII rifles, S&W M&P pistols or Mossberg 590 shotguns. I’m more liable to buy a DIY mag. I used to buy Warbird Digest, but they went to subscription only & I can’t be arsed to fill out the paperwork for that.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259762
    ZRX61
    Member

    Anyone can join by paying the membership fee. They have elected leaders. I was a member for 5 years, but gave it up owing to the amount of junk mail I received… including a request to “renew early” only a week after I paid a five year membership. I read the one page of their magazine that interests me & throw it in the trash.

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1858065
    ZRX61
    Member

    Anyone can join by paying the membership fee. They have elected leaders. I was a member for 5 years, but gave it up owing to the amount of junk mail I received… including a request to “renew early” only a week after I paid a five year membership. I read the one page of their magazine that interests me & throw it in the trash.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 4,704 total)