dark light

AdlerTag

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 571 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The end of the line for the Dominie #1149616
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Planetalk forum suggests that one will go to Duxford and another to Cosford, delivery flights next week.

    http://forum.planetalk.net/viewtopic.php?t=9977

    in reply to: Po-2 flying at Old Warden #1149654
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Congratulations to all involved, certainly one to look forward to seeing in the coming season! Great to see the ‘PoliFiller’ turned back into something Polikarpov would recognise!

    in reply to: Ron Foster RCAF, RIP #1150576
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Another great airman gone, RIP. Thanks for the link roadracer.

    It’s a shame the journalist who wrote it doesn’t quite grasp WWII history, I hope Mr.Foster is smiling down from above at the line about defending himself from Russian aircraft!

    in reply to: RAF WW2 photos Singapore operations #1150585
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Yes the fuselage in the workshop shot is another Buffalo.

    I feel very much the same as DD and John, these are great pictures but you can’t really enjoy them knowing what was about to happen. The fall of Singapore and Malaya were terribly tragic in so many ways, the suffering that was endured by so many out there in the fighting and then as PoW’s is beyond imagination.

    in reply to: Need Help with Grandfather who was Pathfinder #1152010
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Sorry to be a pain but what is No 5 LFS?:o

    LFS= Lancaster Finishing School. Alot of crews who trained on four engined bombers often flew different types, such as the Halifax or Stirling, earlier in thier training and so if they were destined for Lancs they’d have to go for a course at an LFS. Your grandfather would most likely have been an instructor there.

    in reply to: Need Help with Grandfather who was Pathfinder #1152059
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    The RAF service records branch has moved to RAF Cranwell, the address is on the following link. As you are not the spouse oft he person concerned, it would appear that you’ll have to pay a charge of £30.

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/links/contacts.cfm

    in reply to: Gatwick Aviation Museum Planning Application #1153428
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    There is a full length copy of the draft letter, in pdf. format, on the homepage of the museum’s website:

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/

    in reply to: Spitfire TVIII G-AIDN/MT818 #1153854
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Ok, ‘not so recent months’ then…time does fly!

    in reply to: Sally B's Paint Scheme #1154319
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    She did look rather nice in the Belle scheme without the chin turret, I must admit. Thanks for the pic Steve, and I really like the one with G-FIRE passing overhead too. It’s interesting to see how she’s changed over the years.

    I’m sorry if I end up sounding like a stuck record, but I would still say that the slight repaint would be the best option. With running costs ever increasing, any change in her appearance would surely have to be as quick and as cheap as possible in order that as much cash as possible can go toward keeping her flying. The ‘Latest Rumour’ scheme is colourful and striking without being too big a job, it fits perfectly with her current configuration and it would be like no other Fortress currently flying. If the chin turret were removed, she’d end up looking much like the ex-Tallichet example, and if she went back to metal she’d look like alot of the other Forts still flying in the States (she’d also need her top turret changed.)

    So a slight change seems to make sense in all sorts of ways, her current paint and current config are just a relatively short step away from being both attractive and historically accurate.

    in reply to: TSR-1? #1154818
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    To be pedantic, and hopefully to avoid confusion, the two Fairey designs were designated with Roman numerals, so they should be written TSR.I and TSR.II.

    in reply to: Sally B's Paint Scheme #1154825
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I’d be happy to see the Belle scheme stay as long as the chin turret was removed…

    I suppose that’s one way of looking at it, although you have to wonder what the cost of modifying the aircraft to match the paint would be, compared to modifying the paintwork to match the aircraft.

    I still think the best solution from a financial/practical point of view would be the retention of the olive/grey scheme, but with different group markings, nose art etc. Aside from the stepped waist windows, Sally B matches perfectly a late Douglas-built F model. Chin turret, Sperry top turret (as opposed to the Bendix on G’s), the pre-Cheyenne tail turret and no cheek guns.

    So aside from that stepped waist window, something like the ‘Latest Rumour’ scheme would be a perfect match for Sally B’s current configuration.

    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I could be wrong (wouldn’t be the first time), but weren’t the two-blade Spit props Weybridge propellors, rather than Watts?

    in reply to: Sally B's Paint Scheme #1155331
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I like her just as she is, does there need to be change for the sake of change?

    To my mind atleast, it would be much more than just change for change’s sake. The fact is that there are currently three Memphis Belle’s, the real one belonging to USAFM, the ex-Tallichet G model that has been modified to closely resemble an F, and then Sally B. When there are so many other aircraft to represent, and so few left to represent them with, should we have three Belle’s? Ideally no, ideal being the important word. I understand that it has been useful to capitalise on the popularity of the movie and so on, and it would be interesting to know just how helpful the Sally B crew still see it as being. I would be against a respray if they really did think it would reduce revenue.

    That said, something like the ‘Latest Rumour’ scheme on the link I posted above would certainly be ‘catchy’. It would use the same Olive Drab/Grey paint and it would be historically accurate to boot. So a major change could be done on a relatively small budget, as compared to the price of a full respray, and you would end up with a scheme that pleased enthusiasts and public alike. In addition, as we all know, kids are a big influence on how adults spend money, and I can well imagine that sharkteeth nose art would wow the kids and encourage pennies from adults’ pockets.

    in reply to: flypast page 106 pacific relic. jap or USAF #1155340
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Yes, definately Liberator.

    in reply to: Sally B's Paint Scheme #1156012
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I have a huge amount of respect for Elly and the rest of the Sally B crew, and I’ve no intention of insulting or belittling anyone’s efforts here. At the same time, it would be nice if the colours could atleast be subtly changed.

    She’s been in the ‘Belle colours longer than any other scheme, and there are so many other Bomb Groups and individual aircraft to represent. I understand that the costs of a full repaint would be enormous, but she could wear different markings with the same basic colour scheme. How about a late-F/early-G model scheme? Some late F’s were fitted with chin turrets, and some early G’s had the old Sperry top turret, which would match Sally’s current configuration perfectly.

    Edited to add: The aircraft second down on the following link would certainly be an eye catcher:

    http://www.markstyling.com/3ad_b17s2.htm

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 571 total)