Looks rather like XS932…
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/lightning/survivor.php?id=630
Depends how quickly they get the plane out of the water, doesn’t it?
I read a long time back of a Corsair that had ditched, and they’d raised it fairly quickly. However, it was in a pretty bad way even after such a short time in the water. I dunno what happened to it in the end, mind.
It flew again eventually after an awful lot of work, and it was submerged for only a few days. I do rather fear that being a modern repro the 190 won’t be seen as being worthwhile to repair.
A picture taken from overhead the wreck (it can just be seen beneath the surface) appears to show the starboard wing bent back by about 45 degrees, so there is impact damage to consider in addition to the immersion damage.
Ahah! 😀 Thanks, I hadn’t seen that tucked away in the corner! In my screen resolution it’s just out of the picture.
Thanks again VoyTech, an interesting website (with a bit of help from Google Translate!). Do I understand correctly that there is also a single-seater under restoration?
Great news VoyTech, thanks for sharing. It’s great to have an airworthy MiG-15 in Europe again.
Is there a website for the Polish Eagles? I’ve tried Googling and not come up with anything.
Nice work all round, but the Seafire take-off shot has something extra special. Well done and thanks for sharing. 🙂
Replica Spitfire marked ‘EB-K’, so presumably this one, seen on the A1(M) heading south at Stevenage around 10.30am today. It seems to lead a nomadic existence…
Thanks to Phantom Phil for the link to this thread, the new thread I started on this now deleted.
I agree very strongly with Kev’s post above, guns make killing and serious injury far too easy. It’s almost the push-button way of doing away with someone, pull the trigger and that’s that. I appreciate there are perfectly sane people who own and enjoy guns, and I myself have a historical interest in firearms (although I don’t own one). But the fact is that guns simplify killing, and it therefore makes it easier for situations to lead to dire consequences much more quickly.
Although this thread is about what a person with a gun can do to other people, there is also the question of what gun owners can do to themselves. Rates of suicide are MUCH higher in countries like the US where guns are readily available. People get drunk, get upset, and make a fatal decision, a decision that has been made available to them by the existence of the gun. If there were only more difficult methods available to them, would they have gone through with it? The figures suggest not.
I agree very strongly with Kev’s post above, guns make killing and serious injury far too easy. It’s almost the push-button way of doing away with someone, pull the trigger and that’s that. I appreciate there are perfectly sane people who own and enjoy guns, and I myself have a historical interest in firearms (although I don’t own one). But the fact is that guns simplify killing, and it therefore makes it easier for situations to lead to dire consequences much more quickly.
Although this thread is about what a person with a gun can do to other people, there is also the question of what gun owners can do to themselves. Rates of suicide are MUCH higher in countries like the US where guns are readily available. People get drunk, get upset, and make a fatal decision, a decision that has been made available to them by the existence of the gun. If there were only more difficult methods available to them, would they have gone through with it? The figures suggest not.
True Mike, but what I meant by a ‘false’ reg is one that the aircraft isn’t currently registered as, whether it wore it in the past or not. “D-AQUI” wears her current reg in very small lettering under the tailplane, although many aircraft wearing false reg’s in the States don’t even carry thier true N-number anywhere.
In the States you can have two aircraft wearing identical markings (trying to think of examples, I think there are two P51’s marked as ‘Big Beautiful Doll’ on the US register aswell as a third BBD owned by Rob Davies over here). In certain places you can also fly with a ‘false’ civil registration, such as Lufthansa’s Ju52 “D-AQUI”, which is really D-CDLH, and several British types in the states wear a G- registration even though they are US registered.
So in a nutshell, in the UK you can’t have either a fake civil registration, or a paint job that’s identical to another aircraft on the UK register.
Heard this news a couple of days back, it must be very disappointing for everyone involved. Here’s hoping the damage isn’t too bad and it’s back up again soon.
For some reason, that snippet at 5:05 is rather ironically of a Heinkel 111 bomb bay, hence the bombs falling out backwards.
I have to agree it was slightly irksome that these replicas were being passed off as the real thing, artistic licence was being stretched a bit thin. I felt the ‘dogfight’ scenes were also a little bit too tame, they jinked a bit and that was all. That said, we can’t have everything and to my mind a decent job was done of presenting the basic story of air fighting in the Great War, even if it was a touch simplified and melodramatic, and a touch innaccurate in places , eg. “Kaput”!
Absolutely corking shots Brian, nice work! Love the Spit/Buchon shots especially, thanks for sharing them.