I wasn’t aware that was a British Standard for Aerojumbles that had been infringed. All the people at Popham did their best and got stuffed by the weather. Would you have stood there all day in the rain with a table full of aeronuatical junk waiting for someone in a snorkel to come past and buy? What do you expect flat-packed Sea Furies?
A junk sale is a junk sale, be it a car boot, an auto jumble or an aero jumble (of which popham tries to be both and in the good weather almost suceeds) and the bottom line is that most of it is junk. Sometimes you get a pearl sometimes you just get the seafood.
Now, if you want to organise a better one . . . .
or even define what an aero jumble is?
MH
Admittedly my original post was a little harsh and I’m not having a go the people who organised the Popham event or the traders, but do you really expect me to be happy when having travelled a long way to an event advertised as an aerojumble, it turns out that there is precious little aerojumble there? The plant, embroidery, toy and camo jackets stalls far outnumbered the stalls that are supposed to be the whole point of the day. As you say Melvyn, a junk sale is a junk sale, but don’t pretend it’s an aerojumble.
Now my real point I suppose is the poor state of the ‘aerojumble’ in general. As I said in my original post they’re ALL in a bad way and I think that kind of event is dying a death. That’s not anybody’s fault, there isn’t the stuff out there to sell at these things anymore as Bruce has quite rightly said.
Frankly Shoreham is dying because the organisers are demanding unrealistic fees for stands and Popham has become a general boot sale event rather than an aero/autojumble. And those are comments made by a number of the higher profile traders at these events not just me.
So went along to Plopham today (called so because that is what the ground was made of) and got wet.
It should be called Plopham because that’s exactly what it was…a load of plop. Undoubtedly the worst and most pointless event laughingly called an “aerojumble” that I have ever attended. More like a car-boot sale. I thought Shoreham was bad, but Popham today redefined the word. Do FlyPast still sponsor this dead duck? 😡
I remember having a good look at that Twinpin when I was there a few years ago. It looked in good nick then but looks even better now so it’s good to know they’re looking after it.
Wasn’t there a ruddy great railway locomotive nearby as well?
And inside…
Well, here are a couple of pictures as things stand. Not very exciting photos I’m afraid.
Originally posted by Ray Jade
Have you got a pic to post of her as she is now?Can I hope that by restoration project you mean to flying condition (I suspect that if I’d been here longer that’d be a daft question 😮 )
I’ve got a couple of photos of the current state and will certainly post them when I get home later.
It’s only a static restoration I’m afraid although I’ve been told that the structure of the pod is good enough that it could, in theory, be made flyable again. In restoring the pod to static condition I’ll certainly make sure I don’t do anything that’ll be detrimental to that state so who knows, one day…….?!
I’m considering taking the unrestored pod to CockpitFest at NAM in June but have some transport problems at present, i.e. I have no trailer, and even if I did I have nothing to tow it with 😀
Will post a piccie later.
Many thanks for taking the time check anyway. Seems this Vamp is a bit camera-shy 😀
It’s currently on the gate at Wycombe Air Park (Booker) along with a rotting Danish Hunter F.51. It’s intact with it’s sawn-off wings reattached, but is not pristine by any stretch of the imagination.
It briefly appeared in Jeremy Clarkson’s garden of course…forgot the name of the series now though. Was it “Speed”?
Thanks very much for the ID, and interesting that it’s from a Stirling. I’ll pass the info on to the owner.
Cheers…Mark
Originally posted by airgage
Think I did mention that a few posts ago before the gun port lobby took over……………..
Well OK, but it must be primarily down to the shape of the gun ports otherwise all Hunters would make the sound, which they don’t.
Hunters with blast deflectors don’t, T-birds don’t and GA.11s with no gun ports at all certainly don’t. There are a very specific set of circumstance needed before the actual sound is made.
Yes, induction roar must make A sound, but not THE sound that is the classic Hunter “blue note”.
Originally posted by Dave Homewood
Thanks Daz, great picture.Question is, where are the six replicas now (well, we’ve established one is in Omaka, NZ).
One is at the (temporarily homeless) Jet Age Museum at Gloucester Airport.
Originally posted by turbo_NZ
He would have definitely needed to go down to the hardware store to buy 5000 new rivets..:D
…and to Marks and Spencer for a clean pair of trousers I shouldn’t wonder 😀
Yes, the Hunter ‘blue note’ is produced by the airflow over and into the gun blast tubes. You need 2 things – high speed (as airbedane has already mentioned) and you need a Hunter without blast deflectors on it’s gun ports.
As stringbag has pointed out the only Hunter left that can produce the blue note properly (with the very sad crash of Peter Hellier/Hunter Flying Club’s F.6A XF516) is Kennet Aviation’s XF515.
Beautiful though XF515 is, my favourite flying Hunter by a long way was XF516. The poor old girl is much missed.:(
Originally posted by Ant Harrington
He’d also never flown the aircraft to such a distant target, the importance of this being that he’d never had to use the fuel tank selectors behind the seat. Nesbitt’s theory is that Gibson,unfamiliar with the selectors and groping around for them in the dark, selected an empty tank.
Curious to know why Gibson was doing this rather than his observer? Had the observer been injured or killed at this stage?:confused:
Originally posted by DazDaMan
Just thinking about this whole camera-ship/para-droppnig Spitfire thing, I’m sure one of the ex-movie pilots frequents the PPrune forums, but I’m damned if I can recall the name.
I believe his name is Tim something – sorry can’t remember his surname for the life of me.:confused: