dark light

Spitfire9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 2,413 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2092253
    Spitfire9
    Participant
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Deleted

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2093161
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Bulgaria approves F-16 purchase

    Approval from the council of ministers was obtained on 10 July, with the agreement likely to be put before the country’s parliament next week.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/bulgaria-approves-f-16-purchase-459581/

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2093165
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Portugal has become Embraer’’s first confirmed export customer for the KC-390 tactical transport/tanker

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar…ntract-459625/

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2093259
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Croatia kicks off MRCA procurement process

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/204303/croatia-kicks-off-fighter-procurement-process.html

    I hope their budget will only only cover something Russian or a light single-engine fighter eg F-16, Gripen, F/A-50. I find it tedious when everyone under the sun is involved in a selection process where the customer cannot possibly afford a medium western twin or F-35.

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093312
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Saudi Arabia should be obvious.
    Canada, Kuwait, Oman, Brasil, Qatar, UAE, India?

    Is the time right for Canada and Brazil? They will have new fighters arriving in the 2020’s which I guess they will keep until well after 2040 which I think is the target for starting Tempest deliveries.

    Yes, I overlooked India but I suspect that India will want to develop something indigenously. If India abandoned AMCA then Tempest participation would be a good idea forr India in my opinion.

    Arabian peninsular countries? What could they contribute apart from funds? I’m not suggesting they could not contribute in any other way. I just don’t know what. I also recall that Saudi Arabia was going to build some of the Typhoons they ordered but in the end did not organise anything so the Typhoons they were going to build ended up being built in England.

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093346
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Sweden, Japan, Italy and Turkey have been among the countries touted as being potential partners for a program aimed at seeing the first aircraft flying around 2035.

    Mark Goldsack, the director of the UK government’s defense and security export organization, told media at the Paris Air Show recently that the British were holding discussions about joining the program with at least a dozen countries.

    https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/07/07/sweden-to-join-british-tempest-next-gen-fighter-push/

    So talking to Sweden, Japan, Italy and Turkey is no surprise but at least 8 more countries? Apart from possibly Korea I cannot think who else might be interested in joining the Tempest programme. Any ideas, anyone?

    Spitfire9
    Participant

    For me India joining the F-3 project as a junior partner would benefit both parties.

    What can India offer Japan? A contribution to development costs, cheaper development engineering (where India has the know how to undertake development tasks), cheaper production and assembly and a larger production run, possibly making F-3 sufficiently price competitive to win export contracts.

    What can Japan offer India? The technology (or ability to develop or acquire such) to actually build the F-3, decision making discipline, organised project management etc

    On the political level both India and Japan are unsettled by China’s rise to prominence.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2093366
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Airbus, Boeing indicate they may pull out of Canada fighter jet race – sources

    Boeing and Airbus have now formally written to Ottawa expressing concerns about the current requirements, said two sources familiar with the matter who declined to be identified given the sensitivity of the situation.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-c…-idUSKCN1U32EX

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093481
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Sweden is a good partner from the aspect of developing the aircraft. But they aren’t from the aspect of market size. This program needs a country which makes substantial buys for it to get off the ground.

    UK x 150 + Sweden x 50 + ??? Italy x 80 or ??? Japan x 100 might make the numbers viable? And who knows what problems Turkey will encounter with their 5G. If they foresee really serious problems early on in their project it might be worth their while to consider switching to Tempest.

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093568
    Spitfire9
    Participant
    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2094739
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    #Scorpion

    I don’t know if the article is misleading or not but in terms of the Swiss contest, were the Typhoons evaluated fitted with production versions of AESA? I believe that the terms of the evaluation are that the aircraft tested were to be versions currently in service.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2094746
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Typhoon AESA:

    Eurofighter AESA radar delay impacts competitiveness

    The status of Eurofighter’s future AESA radar, however, remains murky, and it is not even mentioned in Eurofighter’s June 20 statement on the LTE study.

    Clearly, studying how to keep Eurofighter operationally relevant “for decades to come” without replacing its 20-year old mechanically-scanned radar leaves a glaring gap in its market credibility, yet Eurofighter continues to evade the issue.

    At a press conference at the Paris Air Show on Wednesday, Eurofighter officials refused to say when, and if, the Leonardo Captor-E active electronically-scanned array (AESA) radar developed for Eurofighter will be procured by the four partner nations.

    Company spokesman Adam Morrison dismissed a question about the status of Captor-E by saying that “all things come in good time,” and refused follow-up questions. He later added that there might be some good news regarding the radar at some unspecified, future time.

    His position is in line with Eurofighter’s long-standing evasiveness about the status of the Captor-E radar. Companies working on the program refer questions to Eurofighter, which is the nominal customer, but Eurofighter brushes off unwelcome questions with the claim that “We cannot provide any further details at this point for reasons of commercial sensitivity.”

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/feature/203668/aesa-radar-still-lacking-as-eurofighter-looks-to-future-improvements.html

    When the Swiss competition started for the second time I did not think Eurofighter had much of a chance of being selected Now I think they have no chance at all.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095298
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    Saab is out. The end. That was officially stated by these chaps called “Armasuisse”. And the chance of doing the flight test on a later date is dead.
    And that is on “Armasuisse” official site, right on the front page. Saab is officially excluded from the Swiss competition.

    Agreed. End of saga.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095307
    Spitfire9
    Participant

    a lower cost Gripen C/D NG might have been acceptable

    Didn’t you mean that? The E frenzy was devoid of much logic.

    You referred to Gripen C as the low cost option. I think the E version will cost far less to fly for 6000 hours than all the others. Perhaps in the region of $10K CPFH rather than closer to $20K CPFH for the twins and in excess of $20K CPFH for F-35.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 2,413 total)