France Cannot Risk Developing Future Fighter with Germany
Oh dear. I see the point: if Germany might block exports if the aircraft goes ahead, France has a problem.
DOD has spent billions of dollars on F-35 spare parts but does not have records for all the parts it has purchased, where they are, or how much they cost.
For example, DOD is not maintaining a database with information on F-35 parts the U.S. owns, and it lacks the necessary data to be able to do so. Without a policy that clearly defines how it will keep track of purchased F-35 parts, DOD will continue to operate with a limited understanding of the F-35 spare parts it owns and how they are being managed.
Whaaaaaaat the hell is going on?
A drastically inflated bill for F-35 fighter jets would inadvertently hurt other branches of the Norwegian defence forces, a newspaper has warned amid ballooning costs, prompting strong reactions from Norwegian parties.
The total cost of the massive F-35 investment may be around NOK 16 billion (almost $1.9 billion) higher than the preliminary calculation made in 2012, the Norwegian newspaper Bergens Tidende reported.
OK, iSputnik News is not an impartial source. Note, however, that it quotes a Norwegian source.
Crippling F-35 cost is a danger I personally have always foreseen as a possibility, resulting in F-35 acquisition damaging client countries’ overall military capability. Too late to go for the more expensive (as assessed during selection process) Gripen option now.
P1Ea standard but with Captor-E AESA, but no P3Ea standard prototype with the Captor-E? Hmm..
So they’re not demonstrating an AESA equipped Eurofighter then. That doesn’t seem like a good approach, given that all the other contenders now have AESA radar at the latest standard flying, including the Gripen E demonstrator and the Swiss may not be very happy to check its performance on a bench.
One reason why I think Eurofighter are wasting their money participating. As I understand things the assessment is based on existing capabilities, not future capabilities.
It’s quite hard to believe that there isn’t even 1 demonstrator at the technological level of the latest Eurofighter (P3Ea?) that is being built for Kuwait. I guess once again it demonstrates the drawback with the big consortium approach where each partner has its own priorities and its own set of equipment that it wants.
Another reason why think Eurofighter are wasting their money participating. A number of different AESA implementations slows down development and increases costs.
I see no prospect of Typhoon being selected.
Brazilian Aur Force Gripen E/F update
Sad to hear that there is no trace of the pilot. I wonder why he did not eject (presumably).
Belated thanks for the info above.
Updates on Gripen E programme
Saab is to significantly raise the tempo of its flight-test programme for the Gripen E fighter this year, with the activity to be expanded from a current two aircraft to five.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/saab-ready-to-step-up-tempo-of-gripen-e-testing-456945/
2023
Is it planned to go through prototype then LP then SP phases with quite a few prototypes (as per Tejas Mk1)?
Anyway, HAL still maintains that by end March 2020, another 16 FOC LCA Mk1 fighters will be delivered to the IAF. That would mean the second squadron will be fully equipped with all single seat fighters by this time next year.
Thanks for the explanation in your post.
It will be interesting to see how many FOC aircraft HAL manage to deliver. by April 2020. I take 16 as the target, given the delay in FOC being given.
After that the line is supposed to start building Mk1A’s, isn’t it? I am unaware that a production contract has been signed yet. Given the history of disorganised planning and execution of this project, does that mean that if the 16 FOC aircraft are completed by April 2020 the line will fall idle because the Mk1A order was too late? Again, my take is to suggest ordering another 16 FOC aircraft nowish. Takes time pressure off the Mk1A programme. Keeps the line going. Gets IAF another squadron of light fighters.
India’s Ministry of Defense (MoD) announced on February 11 that state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) will deliver four more Tejas light combat aircraft (LCA) to the Indian Air Force in March 2019 bringing the total number of Tejas fighters operated by the service to 16.
Source: https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/indi…in-march-2019/
At last dekvery of a squadron’s worth of Tejas is soon to be completed. Better many years late than never!
Referring to bkacarcher’s post above, I note that the ADA Combat Aircraft Progtamme Director says “… we are confident the first FOC aircraft can be delivered by HAL before October 2019.” Why a half year delay between delivery of the last IOC Tejas and the first FOC?
Interview with HAL CMD R. Madhvan published 22nd March 2019:
t is being said that HAL will face massive order issues after 2020. Besides, the proposal for 83 Tejas is yet to be converted into an actual order. What is the real picture?
We have enough orders for the next four years. The proposal for 83 LCA is likely to be converted into a firm order very soon. To augment our production, a parallel production line may be developed at AMD Nashik and work shall commence there after completion of Su-30 MKI aircraft if sufficient order for LCA is placed with HAL. Proposals for design and development of 15 LCA, supply of six Cheetal helicopters and 150 Al-31 FP engines are with the Ministry of Defence and likely to be approved soon.
Source: http://www.businessworld.in/article/…2-2018-165552/
It sounds to me that a delay in Mk1A production is on the cards – things don’t get made if a decision to make them is not taken.
There are reports of positive reaction to Tejas Mk1 by IAF pilots. If these are of value (ie not simply because Tejas is an Indian design), I suggest inow would be a good time to order another 16-20 Mk1 FOC aircraft.
So it’s official that the Tejas thread is gone permanently? I believe both of the other threads were restored so I thought the Tejas one would soon be also.
Hope you are right. The Tejas thread held a lot of info dating back for many years.
Being an optimist, I look forward to this thread disappearing ASAP 🙂
Plane maker Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) said it plans to deliver three more light combat aircraft to the Indian Air Force (IAF) by the end of March, taking the count of planes in the IAF’s first Tejas squadron from six to nine.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india…lr5hXaBGN.html
Can’t check the previous thread but I have a feeling HAL promised to deliver more by end of March …
Italy is showing interest in participating in the Tempest programme:
And still showing interest:
I see a problem with depending on Italy to provide funding, so would Italy’s participation create more uncertainty for the project or less?
Strictly my opinion here…
Boeing has been under the gun since they got the contract, which was originally awarded to Airbus. I’ve often wondered what results would be seen had Airbus been the company building the new tanker, and not Boeing.
In a way you don’t have to wonder, given that the completed Airbus product has been around for some time now. Airbus have had to write off hundreds of millions of euros on the A400M because they got it wrong/political constraints eg engine choice really screwed things up. Boeing is in the same position after objecting to the choice of A330MRTT for the USAF
Bit of a case of Boeing losing the opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot, overturning that decision, then making the most of that turnaround and shooting themselves in the foot.