dark light

Phantex

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unpleasant Spitfire canopy for sale #1156425
    Phantex
    Participant

    “….although I have noticed that at most venues the SS are not welcome.”

    Not much change in the past 70 years then…

    in reply to: Future Of RAF Museum? #1156282
    Phantex
    Participant

    They are/were at best ‘loosely connected by a long, steel-type structure that grew up over the years. The were never originally connected. The ‘middle-bit’ is in very poor condition.

    Building consisted of steel columns with iron girder roof supports, infilled with common London Brick. Asbestos roof. Pretty much all built, in it’s original form, around the same time

    The Aerodrome end facade was built to provide an impressive aspect when viwed from that end. The main offices/enquiry booth/drawing offices were built between there and the Watchtower, from where this photograph was taken.
    Many alterations were made to the buildings during their life; it did become the Pageant Club and Station Theatre at one point, definately not the original use!

    in reply to: Fun at Hendon #1141291
    Phantex
    Participant

    For all the vast amount of knowledge displayed on these pages, it’s suprising how the effect of light on Museum artifacts is continually underestimated, or indeed just not understood at all.

    in reply to: Fun at Hendon #1141022
    Phantex
    Participant

    Where exactly did anybody mention photography? Or the lighting in the Bomber Hall for that matter?

    The lighting in the B-of-B Hall at Hendon get mentioned a lot because it is bad, not because anybody has a fixation.

    The chap with the photographs mentioned the lighting. And the Bomber hall was mentioned because that’s where one of the photographs was taken.

    Moggy says it all really….

    in reply to: raf museum #1126108
    Phantex
    Participant

    Hire people who can talk knowledgeable and in English about the exhibits.

    I take it you won’t be applying then?

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1112709
    Phantex
    Participant

    “Anything used/borrowed credited to the photographer”

    As you are, presumably, not giving these books away, you may get a better response if you offer payment.

    Like this for example…

    in reply to: Photograph Copyright #1102275
    Phantex
    Participant

    No matter how hard Photographers tried to stop this, our present government has decided that legalised theft of any/all photographs on the internet is perfectly OK.

    An absolute disgrace from start to finish.

    in reply to: Some aircraft wrecks around Moray, Scotland #1096650
    Phantex
    Participant

    re the Culbin Forest Warwick….

    In the mid 80’s a friend and I cycled from Elgin to Culbin (this in the days of Strumney Archer 3 speed boxes!) along the ‘killer’ A96 to see what we could find.
    We had absolutely NO idea where the plane might be, but the CO of our ATC squadron had been there and had picked up a Very pistol from the wreck. That was enough for us and off we went. I still remember the fruitless slog to this day.

    Incidentally, the Culbin sands area, on which the forest stands, was used as a range for practice attacks before D-Day…several thousand rockets were fired onto it and a lot of them never went off. Definately NOT a place to go randomly digging about and hauling up lumps of metal.

    in reply to: RAF Casualty Reports – Limited Public Consultation #1016504
    Phantex
    Participant

    Not at all surprising given the disparities between the losses incurred by each country.
    Somewhat easier to pay for and process the digitisation of the RNZAF casualty records, for example, than the RAF ones.
    This is definitely an ‘cost’ issue rather than a ‘hidden agenda’ one.

    in reply to: RE8 / Snipe / Albatros (Photo Diary) #1072365
    Phantex
    Participant

    Couldn’t agree more. Some jokes tend to wear a bit thin though.

    in reply to: RE8 / Snipe / Albatros (Photo Diary) #1072952
    Phantex
    Participant

    “More likely in the dark in the Bomber Command Hall behind some roof supports”

    Wow. That old chestnut. I suppose it would have been better if the Museum hadn’t bothered and you had to go all the way to NZ to see them?

    in reply to: RE8 & Snipe etc. at Old Warden ? #1055841
    Phantex
    Participant

    “There are already reproductions at the RAFM – the Pup…”

    shurely shome mishtake…?

    Built by Sopwith Aviation Co at Kingston upon Thames, but delivered from Brooklands. One of a batch of 20 aircraft ordered under contractors number C.P.119901/16, serials N5180 to N5199, with 80 HP Le Rhone rotary engine. One of a total of 64 Pups built in 1916.

    “….the completed aircraft is supposedly 60-70% original, or at least contemporary, components. In 1973 it was accepted by the CAA as genuine only after they received a letter from Sir Thomas Sopwith to this effect.”

    in reply to: Gatwick Aviation Museum Planning Application #1152359
    Phantex
    Participant

    Couldn’t agree more Peter.

    Double standards doesn’t help.

    in reply to: Gatwick Aviation Museum Planning Application #1152544
    Phantex
    Participant

    If you allow development on Green Belt land just because there is already development there, of whatever size and for whatever reason, then very soon you will end up with no green belt at all.

    in reply to: RAF Bentley Priory #1124989
    Phantex
    Participant

    Unfortunately in this case it would have been difficult for the MOD to justify keeping open this particular station, despite it’s important connections with RAF history.

    The Bentley Priory Trust will no doubt ensure that the historical buildings are kept alive in a manner befitting the stature of the place.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)