It is based on a recognition that the contemporary left wing is free from any taint associated with the pursuit of excellence, ambition and civic and personal responsibility.

And with that one sentence, proof positive that you are capable of posting the highest quality garbage I think I have ever seen. Something to be proud of.

Wow !!

What a fabulous result for magnificent UKIP. First Eastleigh; now the world !

I just know that all of you right thinking people who grace the pages of this Forum will join with me in celebrating this quite spectacular electoral feat.

Long live UKIP; another nail in Socialism’s coffin.

Er… they didn’t win. Only in UKIP’s eyes could coming second be seen as a victory:confused:

UKIP splits the right wing vote and lets Labour win the 2015 election. 😀

Edgar Brooks,
I’m not the one doing the instructing. You’ll have to turn to pedant-in-chief Mr Green for that. He is the one who relies on taking apart the language of others when his own arguments have been found wanting.

(Anyway, I would suggest that as there may be an infinite number and variation of planets, “what” is appropriate.:) )

Another back-pedal. Now we’re getting somewhere.

I think you have been well truly rumbled. You posted something inflammatory which has little or no basis in fact – again.
Trying to furiously back-pedal while trying to suggest we are taking the discussion off-topic isn’t surprising given your track record on making stuff up.

Does accusing people of whom you know very little of stupidity make you feel better somehow?
Anyway, you couldn’t be more wrong – but keep trying. You’ll get there in the end. Maybe 😀

Maybe you could explain to us why you decided to post the item about John Kerry’s visit.
Was it to inform the forum in general?
Was to show that the current US administration in a good light?
Or was it to show the American administration in a bad light?

It would have been a useful post if it signalled a change in US foreign policy but it didn’t – their view has been consistently neutral for many years; something that everyone seems incredibly loathed to admit. I wonder why?

I wonder what the 140 raped women think ?

I take it that all 140 were found guilty of individual offences?

You’re assuming that because 140 were arrested for rape that there were 140 convictions against 140 women. There may be but somehow I doubt it.

In that time how many of the indigenous population were arrested?

I guess it does. It will be either your way of old-fashioned formal English standards (that nobody uses any more) or a modern, clear and concise English (that every one uses and understands).

The question is; did you understand what I meant? You obviously did otherwise you wouldn’t been so condescending in reply.

To be honest, re-posting myths and legends as fact is a bit of a hobby of yours isn’t it?