dark light

Derekf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #259161
    Derekf
    Participant

    I’m guessing you may be right. Maybe Andy wanted to delete it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259168
    Derekf
    Participant

    Being able to communicate while in your car is very useful, especially if you’re in it a lot and could be potentially life-saving (I wonder if accident response times are better with phones nowadays) As I said with a hands free facility kit it is no different to talking to someone in the car with you. On the car I have it is all controlled with buttons on the steering wheel.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259200
    Derekf
    Participant

    Daytime TV and adverts that use puppets / quirky characters to try and disguise what a rip off service they provide .

    That Spanish guitar one makes me cringe. Awful. Just awful.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259072
    Derekf
    Participant

    What?

    I commute 43 miles every day each way on some of the busiest roads in England. Dealing with speeding cars, traffic jams, tail-gating, idiot van drivers, crap weather, road works etc. commands much more attention. There are many, many more likely accident scenarios every single day than a distraction caused by a rare phone call.
    A real contribution to road safety would be better road networks and driver education, not a petty unenforceable banning of hands-free mobile phone use.

    So would you ban all the other distractions in cars? Sat-navs, in-car entertainment, talking to passengers, misbehaving children or is it just a mobile phone thing?

    in reply to: General Discussion #259079
    Derekf
    Participant

    Why is it arrogant? Is it any more arrogant than you wanting to ban something that most others don’t have a problem with?

    in reply to: General Discussion #259086
    Derekf
    Participant

    I would say it depends on the hands free equipment. If it is built in to the car then using it is no different to using any other equipment in the car. If it is the act of being in a phone conversation that is found to be distracting then we will have to ban smoking, radios, music players, sat navs and passengers. The mobile phone is a much easier target though.

    in reply to: General Discussion #259102
    Derekf
    Participant

    So you’ve never changed radio stations, put on sunglasses or any of a myriad other “non”-driving tasks that you can do in a car. As I said a proper hands-free kit is no different to operating the radio or the cruise control or whatever. I guess if you don’t trust yourself not to be distracted then maybe you’re right, perhaps you shouldn’t use a even a hands free kit.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258974
    Derekf
    Participant

    How many more innocent lives are going to be lost before someone says enough is enough– but hey your need to use the phone on the move is much more important.

    Maybe you could let me know how many innocent lives have been lost by legal mobile phone use as opposed to driving too fast, too close etc. RoSPA doesn’t distinguish between hand-held and hands free as they think both are equally as bad.
    Nobody is suggesting that using a phone doesn’t distract, what I’m saying is that there are plenty of other equally if not more distracting activities while driving – all equally legal. Are those to be banned too? Interestingly RoSPA doesn’t seem to mention any of those with a view to outlawing them. Would this include the use of smart-phone as a sat-nav or as a media player?

    I use a hands-free to pass on brief messages to let my family know I’ve been delayed, I’m held up in yet another traffic jam or asking to find out information about the weather; in total maybe a couple of times a week. Something that a mobile phone is ideally suited for. I don’t use my phone for idle chatting while driving and unless it is a number I recognize, I generally don’t answer calls. Waiting on the next service station is impossible (there aren’t any on my commute) as is pulling over (of my 43 mile commute, only 3 miles at each end are not on a motorway). As usual any ban would end up hurting those that use a phone sensibly – those that don’t will carry on using them anyway.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258882
    Derekf
    Participant

    I’m sorry. I not sure what you’re talking about now. Are you suggesting that the risks are the same regardless of the time at risk? That is wrong .

    the radio once on can stay on or change stations at a safe location

    Please tell me you don’t stop to change radio stations!

    in reply to: General Discussion #258661
    Derekf
    Participant

    I wonder if it’s a flash player problem that is affecting me. Every time I use the forum on my phone (Firefox for Android 4.4.2) it crashes the browser. I know Flash support for Android is pretty much non-existent so I wodnder if it’s connected. Oddly enough on the tablet (Galaxy Tab 10.1) it’s fine. They have different Android versions though.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258440
    Derekf
    Participant

    A question then. Do you think Tupac was being insulting towards black people by way of his lyrics?

    I would suggest not and as I said before, it is all about context and intent.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258476
    Derekf
    Participant

    Snafu is right. Why was there no warning with this recording? The BBC must have such a system to stop the unwary DJ playing something like the Sex Pistols “Bodies” to the wrong audience…unlikely I agree but the consequences could be tragic….

    The problem the BBC have is that if they had done nothing, the outrage bus would be heading out of the garage as we speak.. “BBC plays record with offensive language and does nothing about it” sort of thing. The media (and I’m thinking Daily Mail/Express here) have a history here.

    in reply to: General Discussion #258481
    Derekf
    Participant

    My irritation of the day is the “Magazines and Websites” drop down button being right above the log-in click. The number of times I’ve hit that by mistake…… Grrrr…..

    in reply to: General Discussion #258326
    Derekf
    Participant

    In other news, I see that Red Ed is busy rushing out feelgood policies, without thinking about their implementation.

    Sure, getting everyone who wants one, an appointment with their GP within 48 hours is a great idea, and might well work 75% of the time. However, in the middle of a flu epidemic, perhaps not.

    Hopefully, he is grasping at straws.

    And this has what do to with UKIP exactly?

    Isn’t anyone bothered that in the UK in 2014 we have the police involved in attempting to stifle political debate?

    in reply to: General Discussion #258342
    Derekf
    Participant

    UKIP detractors need to make sure they stand the correct side of the fan before throwing.

    Whether the points made are right or wrong is irrelevant and totally misses the point. Why did UKIP feel it necessary to get police involved?

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,281 total)