dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,926 through 2,940 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thunderbird & Blue Angels crash #2158144
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    It’s been almost a decade since the last Blue Angels crash, on April 21, 2007, when Lt. Cmdr. Kevin Davis became disoriented during a G-pull and crashed in the final minutes of the Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort Air Show in South Carolina.

    Three years earlier, Lt. Ted Steelman suffered minor injuries after ejecting from his F/A-18, which suffered major engine structural damage when it struck the water off Perdido Key, Florida.

    Source:
    DefenseNews.com

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2158275
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    If you want an understanding of the early issues with the Rafale program I suggest reading the below report. It pretty accurately predicts the issues the Rafale was going to face in the market place as well as more realistic dev and production estimates.
    http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD106.html

    Thanks for sharing. Excellent analysis (so far reading). This should be also posted in the Rafale thread.

    in reply to: Thunderbird & Blue Angels crash #2158296
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    What a sad day.
    I wonder if such has ever happened (simultaneous losses).

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2158401
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    856k US!? Or did I make a mistake in the conversion?

    Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-02/bulgarian-parliament-approves-plan-to-buy-fighter-jets-warships

    Nearly 1b$

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2158463
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    😀

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2158469
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Aaarfff. I should have not abused of that poire spirit

    in reply to: Norway helicopter crash: 11 killed near Bergen #475413
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Ouch… Material defect + recent MGB swap = quality issues. Not really something that Airbus (Eurocopter) needed.
    That comes on top of the A400.

    in reply to: Egyptair MS804 Missing #475416
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Three emergency landing in the last 24hours

    Warning systems […] Acars are said to have signalled an anomaly on board shortly after takeoff from three airports where the Airbus had stopped.These alert procedures were investigated each time with a technical audit on the ground. The findings must have been negative since the plane was allowed to take off again.

    So far the details of the acars alert are not divulgated.

    It sounds however similar to the rudder trim. Adding the trajectory (spiral down preceded by an abrupt 90deg turn, we have here a convergence of possible events.

    Source:
    Euronews.com Via France 3

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2158708
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    [B]The inherent problem is with human operators. What happens when the ADS-B constant is manually entered incorrectly on the ground…

    Definitively, not something you want to do with thousands of airliners flying around and soon, hundred of thousands of drones. This is madness… And laziness.
    The ICAO should forbid this asap.


    Example of tech

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2158803
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    If you read the document you will see that the recommendation is to not go for a hugely expensive new fighter project.

    I did. But when billion numbers start flying around, it sounds always too much expensive for those not enjoying the comfort of 300ft private yacht 😉

    in reply to: US airpower – 24 hours versus ISIS #2158831
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Airstrikes alone won’t help sh!t.. When you have ~200 flight missions resulting in ~60 attacks with a result of ~30 militants killed, how do you want to win?

    I think the emphasis is more on killing the right guys, Avoiding collateral damage and immobilizing only the right amount of resources…
    Assad is reigning pretty much on the statistics for the number of “kills” and probably nobody want to claim that trophy from him.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2158838
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    It’s election year in the US. Perfect times to raise some momentum for the next fighter project. Also, now that the 35 is on straight path for IOC, it is about the right time to start thinking at what comes next. It is what have been done for generations. Then the PAC might or might not see the light of the day as an original design. Or perhaps as a radical upgrade for the 35 airframe. There is quite a potential (new engine, new material, new emphasis on speed or/and probably on the idea of decoupling the service’s needs).

    And anyhow, after the US election in the mind of any administration, the F35 will remain an Obama project. It usually suits better any type of administration to have their own project since the B21, the race for Mars and the commercial launches will all have their roots in the former administration.
    But it also might not. Don’t underestimate the public fatigue with all the drama that the average voter had to endure regarding the F35, something, quite understandably, on the opposite side of their priorities.

    My 2 cents

    in reply to: European UCAV drought #2158843
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Reverse it , Tomcat : Italy is still one of the few industrial product net exporter countries in the world while UK (& France) is not such from almost the nineties.

    I know. I thought at you after writing down my short essais and tried at the last time to accommodate Italy in the lot but failed to do so properly (as it seems).

    My bad.

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2159166
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Meteor may not be a ‘magic weapon’, but it is unique in that it remains under power all the way to impact, burning the last of its propellant as it reaches the target. This maximises its manoeuvrability.

    … And increase its vulnerability … At least with DEW. So, it does not import much for now, but a country like Russia may well field early DeW any day from now depending on their priority.
    In a decade from now, there is a high probability that Meteor users might face such systems on a regular basis.

    Vulnerability also for the shooter. With net-centric targeting capabilities, the last thing you want is to keep a beacon on your target. Agile targeting will be the norm when time to kills increases. Then, will Meteor users will still be able to constitute a credible threat for their adversary in view of the increased difficulties and number of platforms needed to achieve longer range engagements?

    Think that your missile will need a lot of offset platforms (EW, Datalink, resilient space sensor and communication network supportive assets for the shooter etc… Hence an increased burden on the logistics, manpower and cost etc… Not really a domain where the typical Meteor user enjoy a clear advantage. Hence why go in that direction?

    IMOHO, the Meteor is an excellent deal enabler for exports where the buyer might face only near pear opponents (think UAE vs Iran). But what about the Nato Vs a full fielded Ru or a post 2020s China?
    Allow me the credibility of a doubt.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2159173
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Short but instructive. Thx for sharing.

    Did they really call for a stand-in refueling cap?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,926 through 2,940 (of 5,621 total)