dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214091
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    British business secretary Vince Cable invoked the ban on the sale of all military and dual-use technology for use by Argentina in 2012. That export license is still in place and will likely remain given the impasse between the two nations over resolving the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands.

    “We are determined to ensure that no British-licensable exports or trade have the potential to be used by Argentina to impose an economic blockade on the Falkland Islanders or inhibit their legitimate rights to develop their own economy,” said a spokesperson for the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

    And

    1.3 The Gripen multi-role fighter aircraft—Saab’s signature product—successfully supported NATO operations in Libya with the Swedish Air Force. Up to 36% of the Gripen air craft is manufactured here in the UK, where major systems such as the latest generation electronically scanned radar, and the landing gear, are made.

    1.4 Saab has selected the Selex Raven electronically scanned radar to equip the next generation Gripen fighter as its main sensor. This radar is produced in Edinburgh, where the Gripen programme is protecting and sustaining this key UK technology, as well as being the launch pad for the Typhoon radar replacement. Gripen is an essential part of this programme, and is protecting the highest quality jobs, software engineering and technologies in the key UK aerospace sector.

    I remember hearing someone in the British parliament saying “Not in any way” but can’t find trace of it. We will have to wait a bit I guess.

    Good news is that there is no news and Selx is fully funded for its AESA 😉

    Source
    Defensenews.com (2014)
    http://www.publications.parliament.uk (2012)

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214098
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Since they pay for technological transfer, they better get just that 😀 Of course they’ll learn from each other, but they’re a paying customer after all.

    Of course, but ToT does not imply that the focus is on airframe Construction techniques. Perhaps they have more expectations on FCS, RCS, EW, FADEC etc… All being things that they had difficulties to source knowledge directly from the OEM but would now find a larger and a direct access to it.

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Or more T34 Turbo mentor 😉

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]236022[/ATTACH]

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Yes. it’s a good design. The tank fuel could have been innerted however (they are in flame after debris punctuated them – they should not)

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2214136
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Boeing Wins $714M for 26 remanufactured CH-47F helicopters, four new CH-47s, and the option of building two more CH-47s.

    Pentagon Contract Announcement

    Probably that Some German generals might experience a hard time reading that news.
    Let’s have a compassionate thought for them… 😡

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214141
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Isn’t 39-8 the first “real” prototype? If that’s delayed, I’d say the program was delayed.

    Hmmm… I’m guessing the Brazilians will primarily want to learn some new techs and focus on their changes of the platform whilst the Swedes focus on E. Not sure how far they’re planning on taking the Sea Gripen either, but that would also require some significant changes and tests.

    Why won’t it be the other way around ? Br Engineering have shown a remarkable maturity with the KC390 (at least if we consider the number stated on paper reliable). Remember also that the Embraer 175 was a full success in term of design with Pilots even favoring it over the old A320.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214143
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    As far as I know, UK never vetoed anything. Some sources said they would if it came to it.

    No official sources, you’re sure ?

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2214174
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    precise weight I found is 10.190kg

    besides, it’s not “navalized”, as the basic airframe (common to navy a d airfirce) is the naval one. what makes the air force one lighter (about half a ton if my memory serves well) is the removal of some parts and replacement by lighter ones, like the landing gear for example

    Overweight is 900kg (800++) for the Raf M

    It also need a a special coating for salty environment. That suits the need of Fr that had to cover for the R&D cost but might not be in line with other Navies requirements. Especially when India selected the K that has some extensive RCS treatment that comes with it.

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Anyway 2 guys per plane is a very bad idea for an acrobatic team.

    Training / Guest / Vip.

    An aerobatic team is all about PR. Then during training, there is plenty of good reason to fill the back seat.

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Hopefully, there are no death or serious injuries.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2214668
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Spud, Do we know what are those attachment point for? Seems the inscriptions are written in reverse intentionally to be read via an inspection mirror ?

    Other image of the Test article show the same thing:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235978[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Best subsonic fighter of the 50's #2214947
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    AIM-4 was also used by ‘Candy Machine’ F-102s against suspected camp fires along the Ho Chi Minh trail at night. Another one of the typically bizarre ideas tried in that conflict.

    The Phalcon had long prep time in combat (10sec) and a very short launch readiness (<1min). So it was not really relevant for close in encounter.

    It was however relatively agile with a good hit rate and a somewhat large geo for the launching envelope.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2214956
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    UK’s upgraded Puma helos prepare for Afghan deployment

    The HC.2 is earmarked to remain in service until 2025, but Gp Capt Paterson said that he could see this being date being pushed back. “You can break the Puma down in four hours, load into the back of a C-17 [transport aircraft], fly it to anywhere in the world, and assemble it again in four hours. That’s not something you can do with any other [UK military] helicopter

    Interesting.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2215076
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    B1B gets JASSM-ER

    The JASSM-ER more than doubles the range of the original JASSM and encompasses all of the same features. The JASSM is able to distinguish between targets and bystanders, fly a varied path after deployment, and penetrate well-fortified or buried infrastructure[…] the B-1 is the only airframe to have the JASSM-ER in the initial operational capability [(IOC)] phase this soon

    he 9th BS released more than 2,000 [more classical] JDAMs in support of multiple areas of responsibility.

    More range built in the weapon, more surface can be covered and continuously monitored by a single aircraft

    Source:
    http://www.acc.af.mil/

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2215080
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Indian Air Force C130J relieves passenger stranded in Kathmandu/Nepal after the crash of a bulky A330 on the small airport

    An Indian Airforce C-130J Hercules capable of landing on shorter runways brought in a repair kit for the crashed plane and technicians � who raised the plane nose on inflatable tubes and rested it on a flatbed tow truck.[…] 2,000 stranded and angry Chinese passengers [had] demonstrated in front of the airport demanding to be returned home.

    Source:
    http://www.npr.org/ via User Newforest @ Keypub/CivilAvia

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 5,621 total)