TomcatViP i take your point about the aerodynamic configuration being tested. Do you think that the use of slats in that test is specific to A2A work or something they would look to clear regardless of the weapons carried?
To what extent will the A2A load interact with the CFTs over the fuselage? I mean, are they going to use user specific weaponry for this test or something more generic?
First, we have pictures of models of the Typhoon being tunnel tested with similar A2A load. So as Fedaykin and EELighthning mentioned, it could only be the reference study on which they want to plug in the new data.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227808[/ATTACH]
Now, we have the slats being deployed, what point us to the low speed regime. CFT impart the flow around the tail with an influence on the AoA. So,they were probably validating that part of the regime that day using a reference config.
On the other end the pylon and the weapon on the outboard part of the wing are negatively affecting yaw stability at large AoA (what dictate max AoA). That part of flight domain might have needed some wind tunnel testing. This is where my remark started.
So either, they needed to compare the “new” CFT design with the old one.
Either they had a specific request from customer using AIM9 and going mainly A2A.
It seems they have serrated most of the Canards and Wing trailing edges à la Rafale. That’s what a close up view of some of the latest Grey J20 pictures seems to show. I think that this is what you see pointed by the arrow on the right of the above image (didn’t watch the vid at that point).
New U.S. Stealth Jet Can’t Hide from Russian Radar (excerpt)
When a 7 year old talks about porn, it’s full of sorcery, spitting dragoons and, yes, flying creatures… Good!
“It has to do more with the internal design of the blade,” he says. “Heat is evenly distributed and very consistently removed from the blades, with no thermal gradients. There are improvements in coatings as well.”
Yum Yum…. More!
New missions in six states:
■Beginning in 2015, the A-10 unit at Gowen Field Air National Guard Base near Boise, Idaho, would transfer to a classic association with F-15E units at nearby Mountain Home Air Force Base.
■In 2017, the Guard A-10 unit at Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Mich., would receive eight KC-135s.
■In 2018, the Guard A-10 unit at Martin State Air National Guard Base, Md., would receive eight C-130Js, while the Reserve unit at Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., would receive 18 F-16s.
■In 2019, a Reserve unit at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., and a Guard unit at Fort Wayne, Ind., would both receive 18 F-16s.
Sources:
http://www.airforcetimes.com/
FrankenMiG ?
personally i think its to help Stormshadow carriage as much as anything else, and that is looming as far as the UK is concerned.
I more convinced that they are asserting AoA and turn rate in A2A config with CFT. Hence the slats.
But those Sidewinders… Hummm
All right, the Gripen debate is warming up. Despite having had many topics in the media about the Gripen acquisition the past two years (mostly against the aircraft), it is only now that the average Joe/Linda voter can start to really make his/her mind.
For the last round, each citizen/household received “propaganda” from both side, which I incidentally received both the very same day (ie. today):
Gripen YES campaign material: [DE|FR]
Gripen NO campaign material: [DE|FR|IT]
I definitely prefer the design of the “No” side flyer. Too bad the content doesn’t match the quality of its layout 😀
The content of flyer advocating the NO is disastrous. At least, If you force ppl away from a peaceful spring Sunday in the mountain down the ballots, please, pay attention to your arguments.
Having CFT’s on the phoon seems a non-brainer..
AIM9 and AIM120… Who are they for?
Interesting!
So do we have a Bear frenzy among UK DoD planners ?
The photo is obviously an McDonnell Douglas A-12 Avenger II
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227682[/ATTACH]
I´ll get me hat
I prefer this view that converge more with what we see in front of the leading edge :rolleyes:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227685[/ATTACH]
The plane is still not declared lost “it is “hard to imagine otherwise [passengers death].” : Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak
he believes there was someone monitoring the radar, “but the interpretation was done after the event.”
It was not known whether the plane was MH370, he said, and no planes were sent up to investigate “because it was deemed not to be hostile.” It “behaved like a commercial airline, following a normal flight path,”
Source:
CNN.COM
Its a very painful disclosure strategy that’s what it is!!!!
For what it’s worth, I’m having trouble with Texas and Kansas being the same aircraft type. Am I alone there?
I agree totally. I see two different ones. One large, one seemingly small.
AAAArrff Sooo much energy and you have just decided to escape here on this forum, you nasty bolt ?
re-aaarff. I guess KeyPub have reached its critical mass.
Please if you are a teensomething don t take it personal and do something stupid. I am only joking around it.