dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,146 through 5,160 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Top speed of F14-D with GE engines #2250891
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    I am sure that if The Iranians can get a Nuclear deal, new parts and upgrades would flows in. Northrop/Grumman hve all interest into this.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2250928
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Frankly I would say* (speaking for many I guess) that I am a little bit tired of nearly spiritual revelation from Chinese Blog/fan. Show it or hide it.

    Those kind of 2 bits image doesn’t deserve the Chinese industry. If you are not confident enough, don’t show it to the public. Especially, when you then display such Frankenstein’s design like the last drone image we had to swallow…

    *And I admire your patience

    in reply to: what second stealth fighter russia need? #2250932
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    There is not a basic technical problem as such but in times of austerity politics funding for a stealth fighter project is easier to come by if a partner can be found that actually needs one. Saab is looking to develop the 2020 5G stealth fighter & I last heard there was interest in Turkey to codevelop it (spread the cost out) & Dassault will need to soon develop a 5G air frame to avoid being totally sandwiched out of the international market so can you suggest a development partner in Europe other than Mig (almost Europe) that is not committed to the F35??

    I don’t see any needs for Dassault to partner for a new 5G aircraft. Dassault made a spacecraft (nearly), built stealth drone (likely), participate in an hypersonic recce drone (probably) and tried desesperatly to sell the best mil tool for the next 10 years (Raf).
    On the contrary, not being insulting, far from that, MiG didn’t display any capabilities regarding 5G. I am sure they did. And hve my own opinion regarding that point. But, the first rule when you want to tease, is to show an interesting piece of skin. Shaking in rhythms is quite commune with no effects nowadays, sadly…

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2251184
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Wishful thinking as for an industrial strategy.

    Even if I do like to read words like active stealth…

    But on other themes like the inlet geo, it’s hard not to rethink the way its designer hve trapped themselves by a simple lack of SA.

    Moreover, I do disagree with your analysis regarding the evo in the long term of the cost of dev of new airframes. Everything tells us that price will go down at equivalent kinetics perfs (total systems cost will not obviously).

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2251273
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Take Off Magazine Nov issue

    http://en.take-off.ru/pdf_to/to28.pdf

    Thx!

    Extracted among other news:

    RACHEL new helicopter (project) from Mil to replace the Mi-8 family – Cruise speed targeted around 350kph (French or Russian engines)

    K62 civil variant of Ka60 with 290 cruise (French engines – man hve to see the ultra-compact layout for a 1750hp range of turbine)

    – Bombardier to jointly produce the Q400 turboprop in Russia for the Russian/CIS market (estimated ard 210)

    An70 prod still stalled in the waiting of a Russian decision.

    And those rather astonishing quote:
    The Mi28UB became Rostvertol’s first aircraft productionised with the use of digital modeling, rather than traditional techniques

    – Speaking abt the Mig29K sea trial:
    12 takeoffs and deck landings were performed at night, which had not been done by Russian carrierborne aviators since 1999
    and …
    the aircraft carrier to return to the shipyard for repair of her propulsion plant’s boiler thermal insulation coating

    in reply to: what second stealth fighter russia need? #2251876
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    You are right but missed one thing IMOHO: the 29 had two engines and did fulfill the job of export until cold war put the Rouble at such a level that it didn’t make so much diff to go for the big one.

    So lets be clear, Su does not hve to review its copy from scratch. In my view, it’s well the opposite. A scaled down version, will do the job.

    in reply to: new Pak-fa paint scheme #2251881
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The last shark pic cld be labelled:
    Yum-Yum (Euro]Canards (end this sentence with a bite sound) :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2251936
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    They have just painted t-50-5 similarly to X-35 and (less so) YF-22 prototypes. There’s little to be excited about.

    Yeah, you can stop right there,cause it is 100% not RAM or any special kind of top-coat. RAM will most likely be similar to what you see on F-35 (dark grey).

    I understand you want fact only.But any found start with hypothesis.

    Regarding the radiation sign, I remember the story of a team adding such a sign juts to make the opponents burn a great amount of synapse figuring what it may be and a lot of money trying to counter it*. In my view, this is what we have here.

    *Wld be pleased if someone remind me who it was . Lockheed? Gruman? Dassault? Can’t get it.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2252179
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    I think this one will raise unanimity:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]223080[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2252183
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Next up they will make the Pak FA look like an F35 from above. Current color scheme is just to test how well they can make it look like another aircraft. This is well worth the millions they spend every time they’re painting the aircraft.

    +1

    It could easily be swapped for an F22 silhouette.

    There is also the hypothesis that the paint is more than a simple one.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2013 and beyond #2252741
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    There have been a couple of posts about that recently. I wondered where the quote was from because it seemed to be written oddly.

    Any way, so Typhoon could soon be reaching the wondrous heights of F35 style AoA….

    What is indeed funny if you think of it (even if I’ve an other word in mind)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2253201
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Extracted from the above:

    It is planned to purchase two thousand aircraft and thus by 2020

    !!?!!!

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2253274
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    These are not head on shots. Where is the fuel in a Meteor? What view does a laser on an aircraft have of an approaching AAM? Is it the same as in your cases?

    Which AAMs have the sensors, software, & controls to perform the cooling tricks you refer to?

    Those are good question but I fear we are running OT like crazy now.

    Regarding your first point: If a Laser defending system is of any sort involved, it means that the missile has been detected and is tracked. A missile leads on its target, hence its aspect ratio, as viewed by the aircraft is off-frontal aspect. Generally also, the aircraft will try to fly on a perpendicular path.

    Regarding point two: I do not know any missile alrdy integrating a defensive counter measure against a Laser system. So this is pure speculation ONLY.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2253354
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: Did the Luftwaffe make the right choice with the F-104? #2253652
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Thx!

Viewing 15 posts - 5,146 through 5,160 (of 5,621 total)