dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Two JF-17 vs One Su-30MKI #2237913
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Can we close that thread?

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2238377
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Woaw so much to read for a pics threads

    in reply to: Question about Instantaneous Turn Rates #2238380
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    You’re right (canards are out of phase with the main aero acting surface – the wing).

    But it’s OT!

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2238617
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    more likely some installation from first external weapon release tests on the Su-35S, it is too thin to be any kind of supporting, strengthening equipment.

    http://russianplanes.net/id80798

    Cracks and some kind of vibration dampening I wld guess.

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2238656
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Got it. Thx for the clarification.

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2238723
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Sry, but editor is mislead or (not informed on last developments) on secveral points :
    (i) French MinDef specified since that France still has a 12 reapers target, the number of 16 was given by pentagon “just in case” not to have to go to a second FMS procedure.
    (ii) France do not intend to order all the equipment listed (same reason)
    (iii) only the two first would be complete US systems, rest would have European input, including satcom.

    Scroll down the page 😉

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2238735
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    As a complement, you can read the editor note here :

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/146174/pentago…

    The Reaper would be flown from the US to cut cost of acquisition (and improve persistence ?).

    in reply to: Question about Instantaneous Turn Rates #2238740
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    One of the well known deficits of the F-16 is its AoA limitation of ~ 25deg.

    Being a late 1970 design I won’t call it a “deficit” (weak point)

    Just like saying that Amstrong (Neil) was outperformed by Michael Jackson 😉

    The prob with canards is that the AoA is limited by the design of the airframe. And this impact all modifications. Close coupled are less affected.

    in reply to: Sexy Airlifters! #2239054
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    What abt the good old Provider, Cariboo or C-141?

    in reply to: Sexy Airlifters! #2239702
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    C’mon a good old Bizon carying a Bouran…. Theres is nothing more sexy.

    But the same can be said abt 747 and Shutle

    in reply to: Most controversial combat aircraft #2239706
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Spey probably offered a better dry thrust especially it’s sfc.

    Larger…. More drag

    in reply to: F-35 Debate thread (2) #2239709
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Man hve to had thr price of switching from tranche 1 to 3…. And the Raf upgrade too. For all tht I know the 35 comes only with planned soft upgrade.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2240637
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    MiG-29M/35 and Su-35S
    http://russianplanes.net/id111569
    http://russianplanes.net/id111568

    Just noted the LERX’s leading edge flaps… Interesting!

    in reply to: Most controversial combat aircraft #2241451
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    SR71 was not controversial per essence: it was built to end a controversy and the program was terminated only not to raise some new controversy. But you might hve thought about the A12 / YF-12.

    Edit: but the YF12 might be regarded as disqualified in this thread

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Due to fixed inlets, chances of F-22 having even equal T/W to PAK-FA at M2.0+ is laughable to none.

    http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/images/419/41981.gif

    Even this graph explains it well enough. More than that, all current variable inlets have a ramp at the subsonic section which recovers even more pressure, sometimes even above P0, and went the extra pressure/mass flow via bypass doors.

    I don’t think those are simple fixed inlets 😀

    There was a breakthrough in the US regarding CFD (new core with coupling equations) ard 2003 as publicized at the time.

    Regarding the PAk-FA, tech maturation regarding materials might hve added some limitations to the max Mach that could hve or would be lifted at a time.

    Regarding its own inlets, it’s a very clever solution they hve chosen. My guess since the under fuselage photos were released is that it will be highly silly to speak abt straight inlet or non-DSI.

    I am with Amiga500 on the overall points of it’s aerodynamics. It’s a fast cruiser, with Über agility in mind (including high Beta) and a peak mach and ultra high alt (with new engines?)-> F22VsPAK-FA cld be somewhat similar to a 21st century version of Mig Alley’s F86VsMig15

Viewing 15 posts - 5,461 through 5,475 (of 5,621 total)