Do I need to review that assumption?
Be my guest (I edited the dive speed for you from 400 down to 320).
Boring….
Bank Angle Protection
[Airbus FTCM, pg. 2.60.10] On commercial aircraft, 30° bank angle is normally not to be exceeded. A bank angle of 67° in level flight corresponds to the aircraft limit of 2.5 g. Therefore, 67° has been established as the bank angle limit. Approaching this limit, the roll rate is progressively reduced to avoid over-banking.
This 67° bank angle limit is reduced to 45° in case of high speed protection.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]260010[/ATTACH]
Sources (among other):
Wiki
:sleeping:
Ok. So, let’s put that into context:
– You are a FR or German MPA pilot flying a brand newish A320MPA
– Flying above the North sea in poor weather conditions and low ceiling. Your altitude is 20k
– you have been tasked to visually identify a bulky payload seating under tarps on the bridge of a suspected fishing trawler apparently fleeting surface forces. Your radar have pinpointed and followed the vessel since hours when your system officer seated in the roomy Airbus cabine has asserted that multi-spectral imagery would give you a good hint on what it could be hidden there. He has requested a low flyby.
– Request sent to the area commander was granted
– With the comforting perspective of being soon RTB with a mission accomplished, you and your copilot quickly agreed on the vector and speed that will position you 1NM away from the trawler at 1000ft msl
– given the never exceed speed of the airframe, max sustainable G’s, your altitude and the tactical situation, the fact that your first officer has requested a high speed descent and flyby, you will have to initiate a long straight shallow descent limited by your limited VNE. In order to achieve that, you had to fly away from the target for some minutes before turning back toward it and beginning your shallow descent. Civilians controllers had to clear the buzzy airspace hundred of kilometers around and after a bit of chatting on open airwaves and a loss of 15 minutes, you initiate your descent.
– While emerging from a hole in the cloud layer at 5000ft/330knt, you are alerted that MANPAD are fired. Your officer in charge of the powerful defensive suite built by an European consortium orders you on comms to break starboard and dive at sea level. Her voice sounds confident. The system as she used to say have been numerously tested already on C-130s flying in Afghanistan and in other place that she can’t name.
– ” break 90° right ! Nose down to sea level!” she orders
– Yanking the mini-stick on your left side, you initiate a right banking turn and a nose down input… Soon enough, the plane hits his never exceed speed and max banking angle of 30degree. You keep pushing on the stick but the systems hold the plane in its safety flight envelope.
– “Right ! Right ! Nose down !” her now screeching voice tears you ears now
– Out of the haze you can see the missiles plumes heading toward you. Two of them slowly moving off your nose in the turn at around 30degree offset from the airplane center of axis.
– the ministick is pushed full forward hitting the right corner. Your copilot hold the throttles with both hands trying frantically to eat some more knots out of the system.
– “Right! Down!” she howled again.
– That painful sound nearly killed you in advance out of frustration… *
Probably that I should link the 320 flight manual for the reader, no?
*Alternate scenario: Right before your eyes you can see the FBW pitching up firmly your nose to avoid exceeding the VNE.
Air Asia threatens to cancel its A350 order, probably reverting to A330neo due to its high price.
“The A350 is not an aircraft we will buy,” AirAsia X co-group CEO Tony Fernandes said in a Facebook Live chat from London. “Too expensive. Fares would go up.”
Source:
Reuters.com
UK F-35B Lightning conducts first air-air refuelling with RAF Voyager tanker over Eastern US.
Source:
Savetheroyalnavy.org via FB
A lot of the MPA job is ISR and persistance. I don’t see how today an unmanned/manned system can’t be the valid way to go. Just like cooking with salt only discarding pepper.
UAV are less invasive in contested territory (think fishing zone/ species preservation, time of tensions etc..). This is why you had Predator sent everywhere and not bomber or fighter jets 😉
Pentagon Cited Boeing Over Quality Concerns Going Back Years
Flaws at Boeing’s St. Louis aircraft production facility ranged from missing, backwards and out-of-specification fasteners found on undelivered F/A-18s and F-15s to oversized holes, missing components and incorrect parts installed on the factory’s production line, according to four “Corrective Action Requests” issued by the Pentagon’s contractor watchdog.
Source:
Bloomberg.com
From Aviation week excerpt on the last strikes in Syria:
The U.S. Air Force’s Air Combat Command has indicated interest in integrating JASSM-ER with a new electronic warfare technology designed to fry electronic equipment with bursts of high-power microwave energy, called the Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project (CHAMP) payload. However, it’s not clear what happened to that project.
Would have such been used (given that SAM were fired ballistic and late)?
So, we are much in line guys. Great stuff. Hold down on the discussion 🙂
Navy: [T–45 Goshawk] flew too low — for thrills — before crash
Navy officials say in a report the T-45C Goshawk was flying below allowable altitudes Oct. 1 when it plunged into woods near Tellico Plains.
[…]
The report cites a “culture” within the individual training unit and Naval air training at large that allowed pilots to fly “beyond the bounds” of approved Naval Air Training Command curriculum. It also says leadership failed to ensure training operations adhered to approved publications
Source:
Stars&Stripes.com
(Others sources have cited 4 different attacks taking place on pro-Iranian military targets inside Syria)
From the same source as above also:
Iranian UAV shot down above Israel was armed says PM
Israel also announced on Saturday that a drone launched at Israel from Syria in February was armed and on an Iranian mission when it was shot down by Israel.
Source:
Western Journal.com (found also in the Jerusalem Post)
Morocco redeploys F-16 from Yemen to Sahara
Citant des sources au sein de l’armée marocaine, le site leDesk affirme que le retour des ces avions est dû à la situation très tendue que connait la région du Sahara où le Maroc a menacé de déloger les éléments du Polisario des territoires situés à l’est du mur de défense si l’ONU ne le fait pas.
———-
Quoting sources in the Moroccan army, the site leDesk says that the return of these aircraft is due to the very tense situation in the Sahara region where Morocco has threatened to dislodge the elements of the Polisario territories located in the country.
Source:
Bladi.net
Russia threatens to halt Salis at the end of 2018
C’est ce qu’on appelle un coup de semonce. Selon nos informations, rejoignant celles de Ouest-France, le groupe russe Volga-Dniepr a annoncé à l’OTAN qu’il arrêterait de fournir des avions de transport Antonov 124 aux forces de l’alliance atlantique, dont la France, dès la fin de l’année 2018. Le groupe russe claque ainsi la porte du contrat Salis, signé dans le cadre de l’OTAN,
—–This is called a warning shot. According to our information, joining those of Ouest-France, the Russian group Volga-Dniepr has announced to NATO that it will stop supplying Antonov 124 transport aircraft to the Atlantic alliance forces, including France, at the end of the year 2018. The Russian group slams the door of the contract Salis, signed in the framework of NATO,
Well… we’ll see.
Source:
Challenge.fr