dark light

Nashio966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 3,400 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAFM Cosford – 11Nov09 #1133162
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Just a quick Question, Would the RAFM ever part with any of its exhibits? i mean for the right amount of £££ and possibly an aircraft in return?

    (just rather like the idea of an airworthy ME410 alongside Black 6 :diablo: )

    in reply to: Does anyone know what happened to this? #1133320
    Nashio966
    Participant

    my apologies 😮

    just wasnt very awake when i wrote that lol

    It seems that these chaps might be the ones that are restoring the above mentioned aricraft

    http://www.hawker-restorations-ltd.co.uk/current.html

    in reply to: SWWAPS, Lasham #1133411
    Nashio966
    Participant

    read up mate, parkhouse aviation 🙂

    in reply to: Does anyone know what happened to this? #1133654
    Nashio966
    Participant

    on that same thread, if you scroll down you get this 🙂

    http://warrelics.eu/forum/military_photos/armour-weapons-aircraft/2413d1233037202t-hawker-hurricane-recovered-lake-near-murmansk-copy-bofb-bhurst-hkg-007.jpg

    in reply to: Contra Props #1133738
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I’m sure when standard the rear props are slightly shorter, but also a bit broader at the tip?

    must have been me half asleep, you’re all right of course 😮

    Yes the rear props do have a broader tip 🙂

    in reply to: Contra Props #1133913
    Nashio966
    Participant

    im note 100% sure on your question RE aero, but i know that the rear prop blades on the shack at coventry Are about 4 inches longer, each blade than the ones at the front 🙂

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134586
    Nashio966
    Participant

    cheers 😀

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134607
    Nashio966
    Participant

    same lot, they wanted two of them 😀

    I honestly had such a great day 🙂 a really super bunch of chaps.

    That said, i was told by one of them that WL790 had been gutted by pima museum?! 😮

    can anyone back this up?

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134888
    Nashio966
    Participant

    WJ874 is indoors, bloomin’ great news! 😀

    As for WK163, a team has been assembled to assess her current condition and act upon those findings accordingly, with a view to bringing her back to an airworthy state. (I believe WJ874 is included in this arrangement too)

    I am merely the messenger on this and am passing on what little I have heard from contacts on the inside forming part of this team – don’t quote me on any of the above!

    It’s all gotta be steps in the right direction though.

    Great work on the Shack though, how many of us young’uns (ish!) can say “I changed a dirty great Griffon on a Shackleton today”? 🙂

    Fantastic news 🙂

    They both look in bloody good nick to be honest!!!

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134891
    Nashio966
    Participant

    from what my father has told me, the engine that was removed has gone to dubai (not sure what for) The money that was gained from selling off the engine will go to getting the old girl looking and feeling a good bit better 🙂

    Since the buyers wanted to see the engine working before they bought it, they bought one of the ones that was already “hooked up”

    since the engine being fitted is a 0 hour one its better for the old girl in the long run 🙂

    Edit: (from dad)

    The engine was sold to a glass construction company who make structural glass for the tall buildings being built in Dubai. They have to test each glass sheet for wind pressure as the glass is part of the building structure

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134970
    Nashio966
    Participant

    well cov is still a half hour drive for me, but as far as i can see a good portion of the chaps travel for several hours just to do some work on the old girl 🙂

    finally getting all of the engine bearer bolts onwas just brilliant, to be honest 🙂

    I shall definitely be going back down there to lend my hand to them again, best fun ive had in absolutely ages 😀

    in reply to: Fun With The Shack Boys & Stealthy Peek At Classic Flight #1134975
    Nashio966
    Participant

    http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q185/benash04a/IMAGE_369.jpg
    http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q185/benash04a/IMAGE_370.jpg
    http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q185/benash04a/IMAGE_371.jpg
    http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q185/benash04a/IMAGE_372.jpg
    http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q185/benash04a/IMAGE_373.jpg

    I have to say i did feel a little sorry for WK163 outisde on such a blustrous day 🙁 Id love to see her in the air again, any news on this btw?

    in reply to: At Duxford now.. #1135603
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Sorry to disappoint you all, but it was actually the Flug Werke 190 having a high power blast on our tie-down point by the M11 in the dark. Apparently the flames out of the stacks were awesome. Unfortunately some of us were grafting down in the ARC part of T2 and for once couldn’t get any pictures…:eek:

    .. a very rough sounding Merlin or Griffon running up in the dark. Any ideas?

    For shame, call yourself an enthusiast :diablo: mistaking a radial for a merlin! tisk tisk

    in reply to: Japanese aircraft-carrying subs found #1135647
    Nashio966
    Participant

    The largest subs up until the Nuclear age, i always wonder why they did not use the planes as planned to destroy the Panama canal gates as that would have crippled the US navy build up after Pearl Harbour?

    Good find though i will have to look out for that.

    curlyboy

    Just been looking at the Typhoon class subs

    http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/image.axd?picture=080904+typhoon.jpg

    Jesus 😮

    in reply to: Nuclear Propulsion in Large Carriers? #2015707
    Nashio966
    Participant

    i think that the new carriers arent going to be nuclear powered is moronic to be quite honest.

    I read somewhere something along the lines of “… does not currently provide a reactor large enough to power a vessel of its size”

    Do what the usa does – USE TWO SUB REACTORS THAT ROLLS ROYCE ALREADY MAKE!

    The longterm costs of having conventional carriers will far FAR outweigh the short term of building them as nuclear powered…

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 3,400 total)