dark light

Nashio966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 3,400 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Just Jane news? #1092214
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Anyone approached David Thomas about flying her? From what I hear on the grapevine, he would be well up for it.

    so would I :diablo:

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1042828
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I cant rightly believe that nomads had managed to take away a whole griffon!?! 😮

    in reply to: General Discussion #287888
    Nashio966
    Participant

    A very interesting letter in the Times last week.

    It said that all motorway planning and building had been based on a speed limit of 70 mph. That is to say sight lines, bend angles etc.

    With all due respect, Id disagree with this. Until 1965 all of the then uk motorways were unlimited.

    IIRC it came with a race team testing its car on the open road at upwards of 160mph that bought the speed limit into effect 😉

    Ben. Just travelled around the M25, and what with all the variable speed limits, PLUS Specs, it’s a nightmare to drive on.
    Jim.
    Lincoln .7

    Totally agree with you there old chap?

    in reply to: 80 mph speed limit – why? #1872321
    Nashio966
    Participant

    A very interesting letter in the Times last week.

    It said that all motorway planning and building had been based on a speed limit of 70 mph. That is to say sight lines, bend angles etc.

    With all due respect, Id disagree with this. Until 1965 all of the then uk motorways were unlimited.

    IIRC it came with a race team testing its car on the open road at upwards of 160mph that bought the speed limit into effect 😉

    Ben. Just travelled around the M25, and what with all the variable speed limits, PLUS Specs, it’s a nightmare to drive on.
    Jim.
    Lincoln .7

    Totally agree with you there old chap?

    in reply to: Hawker Tempest anyone #1044433
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I think its in the region of £300,000

    in reply to: Hawker Tempest anyone #1044633
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I think I emailed about it a while back, ill see if ive still got the response

    Edit: here you go.

    Mr. Nash –

    Thanks for your inquiry. We actually have a Hawker TEMPEST II for sale, not a Sea Fury. While similar in many respects, the Sea Fury is a relatively common aircraft. The Tempest is a rare item and is probably best suited to a flying musuem or to someone who will restore it to flying condition and maintain it to the highest standards, as we believe it to be the most original, best preserved Hawker Tempest II in existence. Should you be looking for a Sea Fury, the Tempest will not be a comparable purchase. Should you have further interest in the Tempest, I’ll include a bunch of information below.

    This aircraft is almost certainly the fastest-to-flight Tempest available, although there is one in England, that after several years of work is reportedly close to completion. Whoever completes this project and brings the plane back to flying condition will have an exceptional nice and rare aircraft and one worth several times our asking price. If our circumstances improve, we will undertake the project ourselves but are offering it out currently. The plane is currently still in France (in the basement of a chateau of all places!) but we intend to bring it to the States in the next few months. It is in remarkably good condition: really well preserved, partially restored, no notable corrosion, essentially complete but without prop blades and without guns. We believe we know where to get and can get the prop blades. It is the nicest/cleanest/most well preserved WWII-era project I’ve ever been involved with. You can see more detailed photos of the aircraft at http://www.airborneattitude.com/12177.html …this provides more than the single-page spec sheet you have probably already seen at http://www.airborneattitude.com/pdfs/12177.pdf .

    This specific Tempest also has a nice WWII service history:

    First or second Tempest II made by Bristol Aeroplane Co. and put into RAF service, probably the first (see below).
    The only Tempest II to be sent to Handling Squadron. (Royal Air Force Aircraft MA100-MZ999, 1991, Air Britain, Ltd.)
    Handling Squadron was part of the Empire Central Flying School and was lead by Wing Commander G.V. Fryer from February 1944 – July 1946. “Handling [Squadron] was able to prepare the handling notes for each type very early on in its service career.” From 1943 through “the remainder of the war, the Squadron continued to receive new types and marks of British and American aircraft, to fly them, assess their handling qualities…some sixty different types or marks of powered aircraft and gliders were flown and described.” “It would be arranged that the first aircraft of each new type available to the RAF would go to Handling Squadron.” ( http://handlingsqn.org/teams/history.htm )
    Toward the end of WWII or after the war, most Tempest IIs — including MW376 — were “tropicalized” with long-range tanks and desert air filtration for use in Africa and Asia.

    Date

    Event

    Documentation/source

    1944

    Date of manufacture/Built at Bristol Aeroplane Co., Banwell (Contract ACFT/3210/C.23(a))

    Delivered to RAF as the first or the second Tempest II delivered by Bristol

    Registered as MW-376

    http://www.baseportal.com/
    RAF A.M. Form 78

    http://www.hawkertempest.se

    Feb 24, 1945

    Moved to Handling Squadron at Hullavington where it served as the test aircraft for the Tempest II model/mark

    RAF A.M. Form 78
    http://handlingsqn.org/teams/history.htm

    Jul 6, 1945

    Moved to Maintenance Unit 13 (for refurbishing and fitting with long-range tanks)

    RAF A.M. Form 78

    Aug 8, 1945

    Moved to Maintenance Unit 20

    RAF A.M. Form 78

    May 24, 1948

    Transferred to Hawker for sale to Royal Indian Air Force where it served in No. 4 Squadron

    RAF A.M. Form 78 http://www.baseportal.com/

    Please let me know if you’d like more information.

    All the best,

    Morgan

    *********

    Why a Tempest?

    * Extremely rare. Only 11 left out of over 1400 built and NONE are currently airworthy (or likely to become so). (
    http://www.hawkertempest.se)

    * The fastest piston-engine/prop aircraft of WWII. Fastest WWII Allied aircraft, period.

    * By far the most successful aircraft used against the German V1 “Buzz Bomb”. (
    http://www.hawkertempest.se/v1.htm) (http://www.hawkertempest.se/mpg/v1kill.mpa)

    * Best Allied aircraft to combat German Messerschmitt Me 262 turbojet aircraft: “The Messerschmitt Me 262’s most dangerous opponent was the British Hawker Tempest – extremely fast at low altitudes, highly-maneuverable and heavily-armed.” (Hubert Lange, Me262 pilot)

    Why this Tempest?

    * Exceptionally well preserved. This aircraft has essentially no corrosion and is in far better condition than any other Tempest available.

    * Nearly complete. No propeller blades and no 20MM cannons, but every other major assembly and most minor parts are included.

    * Two spare Bristol Centaurus V engines. Included as part of this package!

    * Can be made a flier more quickly/at lower cost than any other Tempest available.

    * The ONLY Tempest NOT owned by RAF Museum, IAF Museum, Kermit Weeks, Nelson Ezell, or Tempest Two, Ltd.

    Morgan Perry
    1.206.335.7710 m
    Managing Member
    http://www.airborneattitude.com

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1045097
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Supermarine Swift (F Mk.4/ WK275) Aircraft, Historic Piece. Restorers Dream!

    Shepards Stores Supermarine Swift.

    Its apparently widely known that the owner places a high value on her…. He wants £500,000 + Vat!!! 😮 The pictures really do show a grim state of affairs.

    I cant see her being worth much more than £5k realistically (if that) 🙁

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1045112
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Just noticed the swift too, what an utter crying shame – I fear she will never leave that yard.

    in reply to: Messerschmitt BF109E G-CDTI – (2006 zombie thread) #1045629
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Dictum sapienti sat est :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Messerschmitt BF109E G-CDTI – (2006 zombie thread) #1045635
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Thats a hell of a thread ressurection! 😮

    in reply to: Avro 748 Sisyphus Safe And Secure At Liverpool #1045789
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Jon/Anon

    Re the photographs – I would sign up to a free account on photobucket, upload all of your photographs there then embed them into your post using forum code

    [img] Image url here [/ img]

    Fantastic work too chaps 🙂

    in reply to: G-HRHI #1045984
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I think its a crying shame that this was allowed to happen – mercedes kept the 500sl that diana used which is now in a museum and yet we sold and parted out an aircraft that she flew? She shouldnt have been sold on by the RAFM.

    How much of the royal flight is actually left now? I know some aircraft live on, I know about the helicopter at weston but what other aircraft still exist in their original guise?

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1046401
    Nashio966
    Participant
    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1046402
    Nashio966
    Participant
    in reply to: Airworthy Il-2 – Sturmovik flies #1046666
    Nashio966
    Participant

    One of the two Allisons in a P-38 turned “backward,” which of course is like talking about Brits who drive on “the wrong side” of the road… Perhaps they used P-38 blades?

    I hope you arent calling brits backward my dear boy 😉 Racial slurs and all that :diablo:

    That siad we drive on the correct side of the road, as do the japanese 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 3,400 total)