dark light

Otaku

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 1,246 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2374636
    Otaku
    Participant

    Wrong…See the MKI about that.
    http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/su-35.wbp

    Agreed, the above calculation is oversimplistic :o. However, I’d expect the Su-35’s OEW to be less than the Su-30MKI’s 17.7t, coupled with 13% greater engine thrust than the MKI’s AL-31FP. It’s no slouch.

    http://www.indian-military.org/tag/su-30mki.html

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2374675
    Otaku
    Participant

    Source?

    Re: Su-35BM weight

    MTOW= 34,500kg; Max internal fuel load= 11,500kg; Max warload= 8,000kg.

    34,500kg minus 19,500kg [11,500kg + 8,000kg],

    Hence, Empty weight (airframe + engines) = 15,000kg (15T).

    http://www.knaapo.ru/rus/products/military/su-35.wbp

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2374915
    Otaku
    Participant

    The intense smog caused by the peat fires has most probably interrupted the flight-test programme. This was the visibility @ Zhukovskii the other day:

    http://ipicture.ru/uploads/100801/Q4P3FKQWWi.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375535
    Otaku
    Participant

    IAF ‘Phalcon’ @ Rostov-on-Don, RF, yesterday:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to26000/025306.jpg

    Otaku
    Participant

    Those ungrateful Israelis, with their extortionately priced- yet free F-35s! 😀

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1802734
    Otaku
    Participant

    New air-to-air missile seeker head developed by ‘AGAT’. Dual-mode, active (inner antenna) & passive (7 outer antennas).

    Claimed passive detection range of ~200km for passive mode and 15-20km in active for 3m^2 target:

    http://missiles.ru/_foto/UVS-TECH-2010_foto/_MG_8152.jpg
    http://missiles.ru/_foto/UVS-TECH-2010_foto/_MG_8434.jpg

    http://missiles.ru/UVS-TECH-2010_foto.htm

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2380354
    Otaku
    Participant

    Maybe EADS et al think that with VLO UCAVS around the corner where does that leave the F-35? Prohibitively expensive 5G fighters have priced the 4G+(+) fighters back into the market, and a mix of the 2 is the way to go.

    If UCAVs have already superceded the F-35, selling it’s A2A capabilities is an uphill struggle for LM- that’s where the 4G producers scent blood ‘Will the F-35 really be the high-end of your AF’s A2A capabilities compared to Typhoon/Rafale/Gripen NG/Su-35S’?. Why’s Boeing sticking the knife in with F-15SE and Hornet mods?……and we won’t even get into PAK-FA vs F-35 A2A.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2380441
    Otaku
    Participant

    There is already talk about appeasing the Russians by ordering 50-60 MIG 35s outside the deal as well.

    I don’t think so. The Russians have long since written-off the MMRCA tender, they’re happy with the additional 42 Su-30MKIs and will be kept busy with the ‘Super-30’ upgrade. There is an outside chance of a token Su-35 purchase- but that’s not within the remit of MMRCA (Libya being the export launch customer).
    Besides, the RuAF doesn’t want to be forced to buy the MiG-35.

    Regarding ‘appeasement’, Pogosyan wants the Indian Govt/MoD to abandon the 2-seater FGFA/PAK-FA, sign a de facto license production/ToT agreement and stump-up the ca$h asap. That way the T-50 can enter series production quicker (barring any nasty surprises in the flight-test programme).
    Being the shrewdest operator in the business, he’ll most likely get his way!

    in reply to: Best COIN aircraft of all time #2385561
    Otaku
    Participant

    ..Sent more than one Mujahideen/Jihadi to the afterworld.

    With a little help from these guys ;)…also ‘Grach‘ meets ‘Stinger

    http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/3280/662rn.jpghttp://englishrussia.com/images/su25-afghanistan/1.jpg
    http://englishrussia.com/images/su25-afghanistan/2.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2387557
    Otaku
    Participant

    Sh-121 AESA:

    http://www.oborona.ru/dyn_images/big2828.jpg

    more:

    http://www.oborona.ru/282/906/2821/index.shtml

    I wonder if this set is destined for the IAF’s ‘Super-30’ upgrade- it’s being/will be tested aboard a company Su-30 instead of a converted Tu-134, and it would give Tikhomirov-NIIP significant ec. of scale. Besides, a passive array upgrade for the MKI doesn’t really make sense.:confused: (:diablo:).

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2031803
    Otaku
    Participant

    «Юрий Долгорукий» prepares to be Bulava’d:

    http://paralay.com/955/955159.jpg

    in reply to: T-50 Question #2387702
    Otaku
    Participant

    Yip,

    http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/5918/tdghernt5y4mnb.jpghttp://img638.imageshack.us/img638/3586/159465795b.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2412340
    Otaku
    Participant

    I don’t believe my eyes!!!

    http://i838.photobucket.com/albums/zz303/MSphereM/yf-23_055.jpg

    Photoshoping a 117S comp.face onto it would make it more ‘believable’.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2412389
    Otaku
    Participant

    If they pay such attention to detail such as the cannon muzzle cover, you can bet they’ve got an effective & integrated comp-face/engine solution.

    http://s003.radikal.ru/i202/1006/34/df1a5628156b.jpg

    If that is the c-face, still less is visible than on the YF-23- hence shows a more efficient use of space. The biggest stumbling block of the PAK-FA programme is the new engine. The Russophobic anti-PAK-FA brigade (all 4 of them) can enjoy their fleeting moment of schoolyard glee…they’re due it, after their crushingly rude awakening.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2412691
    Otaku
    Participant

    I still don’t believe it’s the comp-face:

    http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/6205/180620100420new.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 1,246 total)