dark light

Otaku

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,246 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2412728
    Otaku
    Participant

    Back to square one again…

    http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/5986/1806201004.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2412957
    Otaku
    Participant

    If these a small missile bays im yet to work out how they open!??

    You’re asking all the ‘wrong’ questions, Slipperysam. The engines are in-line & the T-50 is a turkey- is all you need to know, savvy?

    http://s46.radikal.ru/i113/1006/48/708bccd4e135.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2413107
    Otaku
    Participant

    “…and then I said when you press that button it realigns the engines with the intakes, hehehehehehehehehe…..”

    http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/3008/jtyjytrjrytj.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2413508
    Otaku
    Participant

    C/o Enisey (СПАСИБО!!)

    http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/5374/159465756.jpg
    http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/8409/159465692.jpg
    http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/6029/159465783.jpg
    http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/571/159465795.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2413739
    Otaku
    Participant

    http://i054.radikal.ru/1006/56/4e67d1e8c60f.jpg

    …”Now, where were we?…before being so rudely interrupted by the 90s”

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2415305
    Otaku
    Participant

    His Eminence, Lord Putin will be @ TsAGI tomorrow to get acquainted with PAK-FA wind-tunnel testing:

    http://quote.rbc.ru/stocks/fond/index.shtml?2010/06/16/32848976

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2415979
    Otaku
    Participant

    I am not the one who said ‘Goodbye’, YOU are.

    Oh I forgot, not being able to let go is your dominant characteristic- like a stuck record.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2036099
    Otaku
    Participant

    Thanks UAZ!! 17 years in the making- a true epic!!

    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?style=12&id=10879http://visualrian.ru/storage/PreviewOfficial/6942/80/694280.jpg?1276609024
    http://visualrian.ru/storage/PreviewOfficial/6942/69/694269.jpg?1276609021http://visualrian.ru/storage/PreviewOfficial/6942/70/694270.jpg?1276609021
    http://visualrian.ru/storage/PreviewOfficial/6942/40/694240.jpg?1276609758

    in reply to: A400M Flies #2417491
    Otaku
    Participant

    Quite nice.

    http://spotters.net.ua/files/images/0000030537_large.jpeg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2417595
    Otaku
    Participant

    The are neither deep nor do they ‘feed’ anywhere.

    What part of ‘Goodbye’ don’t you understand?

    For everyone else, 117S engine, note size difference of nozzle & back-end ‘shroud’ compared to comp-face. Must be impossible to hide, no? :rolleyes:

    http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/fightersSF04.files/PAK_FA_117S_engine.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418612
    Otaku
    Participant

    The nozzles are perfectly in-line with the topside cowls (which have a smaller circumference indicative of the size of the c-face). The bottom (larger) cowls have the nozzles offset…why? because the engine is canted within the bottom cowl itself.

    In the other pic note the beautiful & DEEP curve on that MLG bay door…and guess where it feeds…

    http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/5630/00000293942.jpg
    http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/1246/t502.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419141
    Otaku
    Participant

    2 more pics, c/o Fotosamurai & QuadroFX:

    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?style=12&id=10862
    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?style=12&id=10861

    This pic was taken under similar conditions (if not the same night/morning), with the same downward LEVCON deflection. Rotating left, who in their right mind would think the c-face would be visible? :rolleyes:

    http://paralay.com/su50/IMG_6407.JPG

    …where are the landing-gear shadows on that ‘photoshop’ pic, there appear to be multiple light sources- but where are the shadows?

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2377452
    Otaku
    Participant

    Only to those who want to see it that way. If in fact you know what you are actually looking at & take into account camera angle/POV even the view from above shows the inside edge of the engines (cowlings being a bit larger than the engines themselves) to be almost directly in line with the inside edge of the LEVCONs.

    No, you can not even see the intakes from above! But when you look at it from beloe you can clearly see that the inside edge of the intakes are FURTHER in than the inside edge of the LEVCONs. The distorting effect from above is due to other (fuselage) structure breaking the circular shape of the cowling and the upper ‘cowling’ BOTH continuing the toe of the engines & no longer maintaining ‘full diameter’ ahead of the engine.

    Look at the pics above, you want the engines to be like the T-10M-10 when that’s clearly not the case. Of course you can’t see the intakes from above- use the LEVCON root as a reference point

    You haven’t mentioned that ‘oval‘ shape in the intake visible in at least 2 pics- doesn’t it fit in with your rabidly absurd arguments?…but I guess clutching a photoshop of a photoshop negates all our reasoning, huh?

    Maybe not having slept in 20 years has had an understandably detrimental effect on your judgement, perception of reality & quite possibly your sanity, nevertheless you’re setting yourself up for (another) huge fall, buddy.

    Goodbye.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2378138
    Otaku
    Participant

    117 engine installation aboard T-10M-10 (viewer’s left) & T-50. Note different cowlings, lower fuselage height difference etc.etc…

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to18000/017176.jpg
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to20000/019658.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2378537
    Otaku
    Participant

    That’s the whole point MSphere, why we’ve been scratching our heads all this time. Viewed from underneath, the engines are canted inside the cowlings (look at the nozzle cant on medal’s pic above), the cowling is straight only for aerodynamic continuity. Viewed from above gives the actual configuration/alignment of the engine.

    The top & bottom cowlings themselves are not one complete structure- they are two distinctive ones, the bottom one is not a semi-circle. Any clearer? see below (in yellow):

    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?style=12&id=10831&t=1

    I agree with paralay’s bottom rendition, but imho, the c-face is mounted higher than the top rendition.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,246 total)