dark light

Otaku

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,246 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter vs Su-35 #2541652
    Otaku
    Participant

    Not to mention the deficits of SU-35-1.

    “[by applying] ferro-magnetic RAM to the compressor face & inlet duct walls…the result is a 10-15dB reduction in the RCS contribution from the inlets.”

    http://home.iae.nl/users/wbergmns/stealth2.htm

    …for the umpteenth time.

    Maybe we should wait for the Brazilian Air Force to decide which is best?

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2543087
    Otaku
    Participant
    in reply to: F35 or su35BM #2548022
    Otaku
    Participant

    “…Good luck boys!! Hope ya come back!!…” -former RAAF commander, retired Air Vice Marshal Peter Criss (when asked how Aussie F-35 pilots will fare against late gen. Su-30/35s in theatre).

    I wonder if the sharks in the South China Sea speak ingwiish.

    in reply to: Su-27 vs Su-35(BM) #2548615
    Otaku
    Participant

    Andrey Fomin’s article on the Su-35 from ‘Take-Off’ 06/07, apologies if repeat post.

    http://www.sukhoi.org/files/su_news_29-08-07_eng.pdf

    in reply to: Su-27 vs Su-35(BM) #2549019
    Otaku
    Participant

    Sukhoi (official?) schematics of T-10 from Oct./Nov. 1974.
    [ATTACH]158752[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]158753[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2550766
    Otaku
    Participant

    Broncho, as mentioned earlier, the so-called “joint venture” is only on paper. Practically it is licence production only.

    In order to stymie the indigenous MCA, the IAF and Defence ministry have disguised this purchase agreement as “co-development” and “50-50 partnership”. The Indian taxpayer is being totally misled.

    Agreed, the Indian taxpayer is being misled but taxpayers are always misled- especially on defence procurement issues/costs, even blatant (public money) bribes hardly cause ripples anymore.
    However, people seem to be overlooking some important points.

    Firstly, the death of the MCA is at least partially due to technical reasons in that that Indian industry is simply not capable of completing such a programme in a realistic time frame, arguments such as ‘so what if it’s inferior to PAK-FA/F-22? so long as it benefits Indian aerospace’ are militarily facile.

    Secondly, with Russian govt. coffers bursting at the seams, Indian money (though welcome) is no longer relevant. In fact, in at least the last 12 months it has been the Indian govt/MOD that has been clamouring for T-50 involvement. It’s laughable that the Indian press is touting this as the ‘Indo-Russian FGFA JV”- though the 50/50 JV will be the MKI-ising of PAK-FA and has nothing to do with RuAF’s variant, as already eloquently explained by Abhimanyu, and clearly defined by M. Pogosyan a month ago.

    In the grand scheme of things, if MKI-ising/license production of PAK-FA is not worth $5billion then those detractors should take a serious look at contemprorary programme costs and not some ill-conceived “CBA doin’ Mach 5 over one’s head”.

    PM Manmohan Singh arrives in Moscow today, and ITAR-TASS reports an Indo-Russian technical & management team will formally ink the work-share and investment contracts between Nov.12-14. So things will be allot clearer shortly.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2551379
    Otaku
    Participant

    ‘Skat’ artwork:
    [ATTACH]158521[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]158522[/ATTACH]

    Welcome comrade Abhimanyu.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2552870
    Otaku
    Participant

    Who’s working on what for the definitive PAK-FA engine (sorry english not available- but in short absolutely everybody).
    [ATTACH]158415[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2552948
    Otaku
    Participant

    Oh stop the twaddle will you… The learning is actually coming from the LCA.

    5B$ in the MCA and a purchase of a few squadrons of PAK-FA is better than another MKI program now called the PAK-FA.

    Stop getting your knickers in a wad… it is widely called a political joke in its present state. So whos doing the nationalistic breast beating? You (who gets hot because the PAK FA program viability is questioned) or Austin & I (who are skeptical of the benefits of this on paper program).

    First, if India contributes the amount of money it is expected to, it deserves a far better deal than is currently stated.

    If India was codeveloping the PAK-FA from scratch, it would be worth it and money well spent. …- yeah sure, we can put that in the bank because Otaku said so!! :rolleyes:

    So why didn’t India go for MiG’s LMFS offered from inception?

    So if the PAK-FA’s a joke, why didn’t India take LM’s offer on F-16/F-35 follow-on? If the Indian Aerospace industry is so ‘advanced’ why didn’t they go it alone?

    The FC1/JF-17 went from prototype to serial production in just over 3 years, where is India with it’s beloved LCA? oh yeah, 25 years later it enters LRIP!!
    Congratulations!! Can’t wait for the ‘N’, (what does the ‘N’ stand for? ‘Not yet’ perhaps?)

    Did you notice in the past year how the Russians were downplaying Indian involvement? whilst the Indians were banging the PAK-FA drums? Hmmm…could it be that the Russians realised they don’t need Indian money afterall? ’cause Indian bargaining power has looked somewhat impotent recently, or maybe the Russian government wanted to reiterate just who exactly needs who here- especially after the Yeltsin years.

    I think all that eyerolling’s impairing your intelligence.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2553176
    Otaku
    Participant

    What we get now from Russia is a customised PAK-FA , Much similar to MKI type project

    This is nothing new, the Indian press reported A.K. Anthony saying as much in September. The Russian press quoted M. Pogosyan as referring to specific development of Russian and Indo-Russian variant(s) at MAKS’07.
    So clearly in the timeframe from January ’till mid-summer the technical co-operation/ development specifics were hammered out.

    Sukhoi’s prime motive was to bring down development/unit costs, whilst sharing as little as possible other than airframe & engines, and they must have used their political influences to finish off the MiG 5G contender, maybe even the Su-30MKI cost escalations were part of such maneuverings, considering HAL production of components for Irkutsk.

    Regardless, in customising & indigenising weopons systems for the “boondoggle”MKI, the Indians get huge aerospace knowledge & benefits, which would never be realistically achievable by the MCA- especially if the LCA experience is anything to go by.

    Putting aside nationalistic chest-beating, maybe irritable Indians should observe Chinese & Japanese 5G developments to realise how difficult & prohibitively expensive developing such a warplane is.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2553238
    Otaku
    Participant

    .. it seems that PAK-FA or other similar stealth platforms are doomed to play catch-up.. how long can they stay in the game?:D

    Yeah, absolutely, the appearance of ‘Skat’ is proof positive of ‘String Theory’, cause there’s no way the Russians could come up with it in this universe.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2553543
    Otaku
    Participant

    Compare its defence spending and defence-related R&D funding with US. Does it come close?

    The Russian Federation is NOT the USSR, nor does its leadership have any desire to resurrect that hugely inefficient & flawed leviathon.
    Russia may be evolving into a thoroughly modern autocracy, one that is at odds with ‘Western’ political & economic desires, but that is their business.

    Russian military reform is now affordable, and the dynamic of it’s restructuring will deliver modern, net-centric, compact forces which will be indicative of Russian national security requirements, which will probably not include power projection on some decrepit, despotic country floating on a lake of crude.

    Russia is not fighting 2 (illegal?) wars -the costs of which will be paid be generation(s) of US citizens, factor-in huge US BoP deficit, national debt, economic slowdown etc. etc. Now tell me, whose long-term future looks the rosier? It appears insolence is easier than self-deceit.

    Sergei Ivanov visits Irkutsk:
    http://pilot.strizhi.info/2007/11/03/4918

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2553658
    Otaku
    Participant
    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2553894
    Otaku
    Participant

    Now it was delayed again to 2012.
    This fighter seem to be piperdream which won’t fly ever?!:D :diablo:

    Yeah, it kinda reminds me of when RBE2 was gonna be replaced with a GaN AESA to much self-congratulation by Thales…then GaN became GaAs…when? oh, sometime ‘soon’…but remains RBE2. Sort of explains why export orders are a pipe-dream too.

    But seriously, there is no PAK-FA programme, the Russians merely wanted to swindle the Indians out of $10 billion- now that’s what I call gangster capitalism! Though personally I would have asked for Euros.

    in reply to: J-10s for Iran #2554363
    Otaku
    Participant

    The J-10 is a flying dustbin.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,246 total)