dark light

bri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 320 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: meteor tailplane hazard #1298667
    bri
    Participant

    In the RAAF, we lost a navigator when the Canberra had a tailplane runaway. One fault the Canberra suffered from.

    The pilot, struggling with the diving plane, caused by the incorrect tailplane incidence, told the nav to eject and the rear hatch was blown out (explosive bolts).

    Sadly, for some reason the nav’s chute opened in the seat and he went down with it. I saw the seat later, not a pretty sight.

    The pilot was luckier, as the wind hitting the rear bulkhead pulled the plane out of the dive and he managed to land OK.

    There is a website detailing all RAAF ejections, will try to identify it.

    Bri

    in reply to: meteor tailplane hazard #1299897
    bri
    Participant

    Martin Baker EJECTION seats were fitted with an initiator cartridge and one or more secondary cartridges. The number of secondary cartridges was increased depending on the height of the tail.

    Bri 🙂

    in reply to: Small accident at LHR #584909
    bri
    Participant

    The BBC reports were, if you have a sense of the ridiculous, hillarious!

    One ‘presenter’ claimed that “the WING had been torn off.” From what I could see on their pictures, it was just a bit of the winglet.

    Another brilliant report on the beeb had another techno presenter saying that the A380 was late because it was “full of, er, techy gizmos”.

    And when will they stop calling the FDR and CVR ‘black boxes’? That, they never have been! If my old grey cells tell me correctly, the term ‘Black Box’ was a stereo hi-fi unit produced by Decca or HMV.

    Yes, folks, tune in to the BBC for the latest low-tech news…

    Bri :diablo:

    in reply to: Reid and Siegrist #1329513
    bri
    Participant

    Yes, the company made aircraft instruments. One such was the (large) turn & bank (ie slip) indicator used in many RAF planes of a certain age. Can’t remember what else, but they certainly made quite a lot of flight instruments.

    Bri 🙂

    in reply to: Stanley ejection seats #1329514
    bri
    Participant

    Nice to see the word EJECTION seat being used. Our people in the media are so in love with American films and TV, they keep calling them ejector seats…

    Bri :diablo:

    in reply to: How about a Handley page thread? #1244852
    bri
    Participant

    Just read in the Aeroplane mag that the test pilot flew the Victor at supersonic speed. Wow! Didn’t know my favourite V bomber was that fast!

    Bri

    in reply to: The Most Boring Looking Aircraft #1257955
    bri
    Participant

    The ATR series airliners. They look like they were designed (and built) in a scrapyard.

    What the hell does ATR stand for anyway?

    Bri :dev2:

    bri
    Participant

    Seems like a possible. The only drawback would be the extra wiring, piping, electronics, spares and servicing!

    I’m not having a go at you, but it’s an interesting thought anyway.

    Bri 🙂

    in reply to: Hunter "Wet Start" #1276883
    bri
    Participant

    On 2 Squadron, RAAF, back in the 1950s, our Canberras had wet starts if the pilot switched on the pumps and faffed around for a long time before pressing the **** (starter buttons to you non-ones).

    Bri 🙂

    in reply to: Forgotten Princess, SR.45 #1310424
    bri
    Participant

    Smooth As Silk

    To answer the original query on this thread, she was as smooth as silk.

    As a young lad, I witnessed the Princess flying over a few times when I lived near Shoreham Airport. That was back in the early 1950s.

    I can confirm that she ran very smoothly. As she had Proteus engines, she sounded – of course – like a Britannia!

    Also saw the Brabazon and many other interesting planes flying over.

    For a BIG engineer’s panel, you should have seen the one in the piston-powered Globemaster! I counted around 80 instruments, plus all the switches and controls. A full time job looking after that lot!

    And, by the way, I asked the flight engineer how a big thing like that flew with just four engines. He said “Man, they aint jest four engines – they’se got four rows o seven in each one!”

    Those engines were four-row radials with 28 cylinders and two spark plugs for each pot. Fancy doing a spark plug change anyone?

    That was a big plane in all respects. Looked like a block of flats coming in at night.

    Bri 😉

    in reply to: Eurocopter floats on river. #514887
    bri
    Participant

    Is that rotor position a new idea for flying sideways?

    Bri :dev2:

    in reply to: Hawker P1103 new Barrie Hygates drawings #1265135
    bri
    Participant

    Great Stuff

    You sure that isn’t an F16?

    Bri 😀

    in reply to: Mr Autogyro the legendary Ken Wallis. #1328554
    bri
    Participant

    Ah, memories are made of this!

    Back in the early 1960s, I started work at the A&AEE Boscombe Down and, one evening, took a walk along a quiet country lane near the base.

    I heard what sounded like a motorbike coming up behind me, and moved off the road. Then I looked around and nothing was there.

    Then Ken Wallis flew over the field alongside the road, in his prototype!

    Bri 😀

    in reply to: Historic Whittle Engine Runs Again After 63 Years. #1328562
    bri
    Participant

    Great stuff! Hope you stood well back when you started it…

    Would it be an idea to post the next running on Utube? Then we could all hear it too.

    A Jumo wouldn’t be worth running, as they had such a short running life. Check Eric Brown’s memoirs of flying captured German jets.

    Bri 🙂

    in reply to: wrecks recovered in Afghanistan #1244112
    bri
    Participant

    Google will translate web pages for you, so try that on the Italian website.

    Bri

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 320 total)