Some rumours I am picking up is that Niederrhein may be a candidate. NRN has 24hour operations, can handle everything including 747s (!) and has loads of space to build warehouses.
hmmm, i’d like to see it before i believe it. How often has this merger not been proposed? This must be their 3rd or 4th attempt.
Strangely the standard of seats in Economy varied between forward and rear cabins.
PH-BFR is a combi plane. Perhaps the seats in the first half of the plane are the fixed seats, with the last half filled with palletised seats. The seats on the pallets would probably be damaged sooner because they are pulled in and out of the plane whenever required.
Excellent report, that looks like a decent size viewing deck at Schiphol.
Those shots have not been taken from the viewing deck. They have been taken airside through the windows. But, Schiphol does have a massive viewing deck.
…any idea what percentage of the KLM fleet has had the modified livery applied to date?
B737-300 … … 8/14 … … 57%
B737-400 … … 6/14 … … 43%
B737-800 … … 5/13 … … 39%
B737-900 … … 1/5 … … 20%
B747-400 … … 7/22 … … 32%
B747-400ERF … 3/3 … … 100%
B767-300 … … 2/12 … … 17%
B777-200 … … 7/7 … … 100%
MD-11 … … … 2/10 … … 20%
all … … … … 41/100 … … 41%
You could also try Biman from LHR? They fly A310s and DC10s.
but how much use would (mainly) East coast based US staff be to Virgin USA, if their HQ is to be in San Fran? That’s one helluva relocation package to put together quickly…
Was the decission to go to San Fran final? I must have missed that.
I’ve been thinking (long day at work), could this be a way for Virgin USA to get a kick-start? They could buy planes, gates perhaps even hire ex US staff. Or perhaps just buy the “shuttle”. It is one of the few valuable assets US still has, so it is most likely to be sold. It may not do the long-term survival any good, but it may be the only way to last beyond short to medium term.
hmmmm, is this real? The photo seems to have been photoshopped. The spray is real but I have the impression the waterpool on the lower half of the picture is fake.
Why does LH use such large equipment to MAN? Was this a diversion? You won’t even find A340s anymore at DUS! 😡
Didn’t one crash last year in Iran?
I think you are mixing up an AN-140 crash.
I would not be surprise if Gulf Air gets dissolved. That airline has been set up by a handful of nations in the Gulf so serve their markets. Now that need is increasingly served by large domestic airlines. Emirates. Etihad, Qatar, Oman Air…. As long as Gulf Air makes a profit they will stay around, but I do not expect a bailout if things go wrong.
Yes and Martinair is another with 762’s with only two doors!
All Martinairs 767s are ‘300s.
Lufthansa: Luring U For The Hot And Nice Service Attendants.
Swissair: Sabena Was In Some **** After Interesting Rescue-attempt.
Eastern (1):Every Airline Sure Tanks Eventually, Rule Number 1.
SABENA: Such A Bloody Experience, Never Again!
SABENA: Swissair A Bien Encaiser Notre Argent (swissair happily cashed in our money)
SABENA: Searching All Bags, Expect No Arrival.
KLM: Komische Landings Methoden (comical landing methods)
VBird: Very Brave In Remote Deutschland
Dutchbird: Delivering U Tremendously Complete Holidayflights, Barely In Real Danger.
Ryanair: Really, You Are Not Actually In Rome!
Schalks: Should Complete Historyclass At Local KLM Serviceagent.
Martinair: Might Arrive Really Timely, Interestingly, Never At Intended Runway.
Both the A300 and 767 are still offered. A300s are still made for FedEx and I believe one more parcel courier. The B767 is also still being made. From my head I remember a handful of B767/400 for the USAF to do special missions. Intelligence gathering for instance. The production at the moment is small though, but the line is being kept open because it is highly likely that the 767 will be the new USAF tanker.
It is a lot busier in the corridors, but everything is together. This makes it easier to guess each others intentions. The ATC and other pilots will know what other planes are (going to be) doing because there are fixed patterns.
It is also important to remember that not everywhere there may be radar coverage. The flight lanes do have radar coverage. Same goes for beacons, ATC communications etc. In particular the flights over the oceans you mentioned suffer from this problem.
Another advantage is that small planes will know where the large planes are. Therefore it is possible for the small planes to avoid them, and their wake. Most small prop planes do not have radar and depend on the eye and ATC to prevent collisions and wake turbulence.
Finally, a lot of areas are forbidden for airliners. For instance military training grounds and airspace over critical installations like nuclear power plants and in many countries the parliaments/palaces.
There probably a more reasons too that pilots will get into.