AMS has similar airbridges as described by Whisky Delta. They are for widebodies though, not 737. Mostly 747s but I hve also seen MD11s use them.
If I am not mistaken Zurich also has those.
Just compare the new Cyprus livery with the new Syrian livery. Even the colours exactly match.
That does look smart indeed, and another silverpaint livery. Will that be the next eurowhite? Something copied by everyone and everything?
Is this for real? If so it is good to see they kept their original design which in my humble opinion is really good. Can’t see this saving a lot of money though as the colours are the same, or does blue paint wear out faster than grey? So if it is not for the money, why are they changing it?
Depends on the USAF. They are still very much in the market for a new fleet of tanker/transports. New build 767 seem to be the preferred option. Governmental purchases are always done very slowly though, so Boeing will have to keep the line open until the USAF decides on what tanker they want.
Also take into account the curvature of the earth. It may look like it is headed south whereas it actually is probably closer to SW or SSW. Besides, there are dedicated flight lines. From the UK to Spain, Spain to the Canaries, Canaries to Central America.
Also, is it a direct flight?
“Thanet 01 you are number two to a F100 on finals. Caution for wake turbulence recommended spacing is 6 miles”.
Six miles for a F100? What are they flying, kites?
For what it’s worth, there is a new airline called EuroManx operating one ATR 42. The plane is the PH-RAQ which has been used by loads of airlines in the last 2 years since owner TTA/Rossair went bankrupt. That plane seems to be jinxed.
Anyway, click on the pic for a larger size.
arrivals:
http://193.121.55.225/tt/tt.php?p=383&g=1&s=0&r=0&x=1
departures:
http://193.121.55.225/tt/tt.php?p=383/2&g=1&s=0&r=0&x=1
it’s not a bust airport, but there are very interesting movements.
BBC World is reporting no survivors, both planes of the same type but they did not mention what type. Judging from previous reports its either 2×134 or 2×154. The tail section of one of the planes is still on fire.
Actually, reading the little information available a mid-air collision should not be ruled out either. Both took off from Domodedovo and disappeared from radar around 160km into their southbound flight.
Could of course be coincidence, but terrorism can not be ruled out. Especially in Russia since Tsjetjenia (sp?) is still a war zone. Of course Al’Qaida and other sources should not be ruled out either.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/08/24/russia.planecrash/index.html
A passenger jet carrying 34 passengers and eight crew members in the Tula region crashed about 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of Moscow, the ministry reported.A second plane went down about 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Rostov-on-Don, in southern Russia, government-run news agency Ria Novosti reported
CNN is reporting that the first plane was a TU134 and the second a TU154. Both took off from Moscow Domodedovo.
News sources claim the first one was a Tu-154.
Heard the same just a minute ago on BBC Newsnight.
The seatmaps are no longer on their website. Does anyone agree with me that KLM’s website is very illogical and unstable?
What would have happened if the cowling had hit the wing? Would that have messed up the wing sufficiently enough for the plane to crash? If I am not mistaken the EL Al 747 crash near Amsterdam was contributed in part to the engine taking with it part of the wings control surfaces.