I don’t think the Pope flew easyJet. It was a promotional stunt by easyJet following news reports that the Pope’s visit to the UK was going to cost the UK tax payer in excess of 20 million pounds.
On official state visits the Pope uses Alitalia on flights from the Vatican to his destination. On the way back to the Vatican the Pope flies a local airline of the country he visited. I do not know if this has to be the flag carrier (assuming there even is a designated flag carrier), or that any one airline will do.
I do not know who the Pope flies with on unofficial flights. My guess would be the Vatican is more then able to afford a bunch of Gulfstreams or similar.
I’m familiar with low and high bypass ration engines, my question was why are the actual shape of the engines so radically different?
The 737-100 pictured has a very long engine that takes up the whole diameter of the wing, and then some, while the 737-300 pictured below has a much shorter engine casing.
That is what i want to know.
That’s because of the high-bypass engines. The diameter of the fan of a high-bypass engine is a lot larger then that of a low-bypass engine.
For example, the diameter of the fan of a CFM56-7B18 engine is 1,55m. The diameter of a JT8D is 1,25m. Lengthwise the more modern CFM56 is a tad smaller. It looks a lot smaller probably because of the positioning of the thrust reverse on the older 737. Add a hushkit to that and the engine of a classic 737 looks longer still.
Very Nice Shot’s
Love the New Egyptair Livery
Im off to AMS soon and from viewing this post makes me wanna go there quicker
Rob
🙂
When are you going? If it’s during the weekend I might join.
About half your photos are dead links. The ones that do show are nice though!
Some more details have come out:
That’s TUI Airlines Belgium (aka Jetairfly).
The Peruvian Navy has acquired two Fokker F-60MPA maritime patrol aircraft from the Royal Dutch Air Force. The transfer was signed on 23 February 2010 and the agreement was reached after 18 months of negotiations. Delivery of the first MPA is expected in the first week of June 2010 and the aircraft will be ferried by an all Peruvian Navy crew. The maintenance support will be provided by Fokker.
Only four F60s where made before Fokker went bankrupt. All four where operated by the Royal Netherlands Air Force. The RNLAF retired them in 2007. Since then all four have been stored at the Fokker works at Woensdrecht.
There is no news yet on the remaining two F60s.
http://airnieuws.nl/fokkernieuws/FOKKERfleetlist-live%20dmt/fokkerfleetlist.html
Yeah I know, I really shoudl clean the sensor. If it’s a consolation, I already removed quite a few of the dust-spots.
BTW, all spots on the US Airways photo are birds. Including the big round ones! :diablo:
For what it’s worth, yesterday afternoon it was due in Brazil. To fly in one day from Brazil to Doncaster seems a bit fast. Loading the ‘225 usually takes a long time due to the oversize nature of the typical cargo. Add to that one or two refueling stops, it’s range ain’t great, and it seems to me that the ETA slot is a bit early.
Having said that. It’s been 1700 GMT, no? So, is it there or not?
Thanks for the reply, lens used is the 70-300 USM IS Canon. Shotting in these conditions are not that great you are right. I’ll give it a try on thursday or friday when the weather is better.
Have you got some time on saturday? The weather this week will be best then, and I intend to go spotting at Amsterdam. It’s been 4 or 5 months and since I run schipholspotter.com that is really quite a disgrace. 😉
As for you lense, it’s a nice good-weather lense. But when it is overcast or gloomy it reaches its limits fast. If you want you can try one of my lenses saturday. I carry a Sigma 70-200 2.8 and the well known Canon 100-400L.
The 50D should be a very good camera. I got the older 30D, and still got the ancient 10D laying around somewhere as well. I am really happy with it.
edited to add: Tomorrow will be fine as well!
They’ll take-off from the taxiway? Of perhaps even from the apron saving even more time?
(someone had to say it)
The interest in the hobby started september 1994. At the time there where not enough of customs and military police to guard all seaports and airports (this was of course pre-Schengen). My dad was a police officer, and every 3 or 4 years he’d be stationed at a large port of entry for half a year.
The port of entry he got assigned was Schiphol. At the end of his tour of duty he gave the full family a guided tour. We’ve been all over Schiphol: the maintenance hangars, a trip inside a 742 at the hangar (including cockpit!), aprons, runways… with the exception of the tower which was off limit even for police I got the full works.
It then took several more years before I got to the airport again. I was too young to go alone, and my dad had had his share of Schiphol and did not want to go back. When I went to college in 1999 I got the student travel card, unlimited train use on weekdays, so I got to Schiphol a lot more.
In 2003 I got my first digital camera, a Sony F717. Here are my first digital shots:
Interesting article, dutch aircraft, no doubt a dutch pilot, at a dutch airport, how can he get this one wrong?
Well, for what it’s worth, the weather was crap. A lot of snow so that might have cause some disorientation. Nonetheless, someone on the flighdeck really should have noticed. The lights on the taxiway are bright blue, the lights on the runway are white. Airport design 101.
Not necessarily a Dutch pilot considering the recent merger.
In this case it was a KLM B733. Since AF do not operate the B733 (anymore) it is safe to assume that this was a genuine KLM pilot.
Oops! Het baan is een kleine bit verder! :diablo:
You’ve been learning German from Yoda?
Am I missing something?
How can Aeroflot and various other russian carriers be allowed so many services into Germany and Austria if the national carriers of those countries have limitations placed on them if they want to fly into russia?
Surely something like this has to work both ways, no?
Traffic rights are given by the the country. So Austria can give traffic rights to airlines from Austria. The problem here is, that Austrian Airlines is not an Austrian airline. They are majority owned by Lufthansa, making Austrian technically a German airline that happens to have its main base in Austria. Russia is doing nothing wrong, short of being an ass… and that has never been illegal in any jurisdiction.