I’ve never been to EMA, but the only place matching the background would be here:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=&q=castle+donington&ie=UTF8&ll=52.829373,-1.308575&spn=0.008505,0.012488&t=h&z=16
Obviously there is an Aurora. We are spying on the Canadians. The Aurora is being used to monitor WMD development by the evil Canadians. The Aurora is necessary because of their closed secretive society and their hostilities of the US and advanced defense systems against a US invasion.:rolleyes:
(the post is a jest, parodying the tinfoil hat brigade. Nothing personal Oshawa flyboy, my comment is not necessarily addressed to you or anyone that has commented yet)
I thought it was other way round, the Canadians spying on the US with their CP-140 auroras?
Any recommendations as to a good place to have a Sunday lunch near Heathrow, olde worlde pub kinda thing.
The Green Man pub is a walking distance from Hatton Cross.
http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/s/54/5422/Green_Man/Bedfont
Any recommendations as to a good place to have a Sunday lunch near Heathrow, olde worlde pub kinda thing.
The Green Man pub is a walking distance from Hatton Cross.
http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/s/54/5422/Green_Man/Bedfont
Hand carries 101.
Is that kind of thing still done today tenthije, didnt think you were suppose to take/carry items for other people, and nowadays it has to go by cargo doesnt it?
Still, what an amazing job that must be, even better if you get to travel business/first class?
Yeah those are still done. You are right that one is not allowed to bring items on board not packed yourself. However, the airline ticket would be on the name of the company (DHL). The passenger flying has to carry documentation proving employment with DHL. This document comes along with the usual cargo documents like a freight-manifest, dangerous goods declaration (if applicable), etc.
I am not exactly sure on the proceedings, as I am not in the air department myself. However, the way I understand the proces is that the cargo will go through regular freight channels, including customs and safety checks. This is done at the bonded (airside) warehouse of DHL or our local partner. Instead of being put on container it will go from the cargo terminal (airside) to the passenger terminal (airside). There our flyer will collect the parcel(s). He will then proceed to customs to get some more stamps and documents approving the parcel into the cabin.
Upon arrival the freight will have to be customs cleared again. This is often a time consuming process. Customs at the passenger terminal will tell you to take the cargo to the cargo customs. The cargo customs will tell you to take your carry-on to the passenger terminal. And thus a nice merry-go-round starts. That is of course assuming you can get to the cargo terminal in the first place. If that is not possible you will have to wait for a customs officials to come over from the cargo area. Of course in our case it helps a lot that we got offices at most mayor airports. Our customer is near the airport, so a short taxi ride or waiting DHL van will then do the final delivery.
As for flying first/business, most of the time that would indeed be done. Not so much for the passenger’s sake, but for the cargo’s sake. Weight allowance “up front” is more generous, as is the space available which is handy if you want to bring your parcel into the cabin!
Hand-carrys are usually small, not too heavy and often quite valuable. You may not believe it, but sometimes a handcarry is done for cheap articles as well. For instance a box of screws you could buy at your local B&Q. This is mostly done if said screws have to meet exact specifications, like for instance in the automotive or aviation branch. If an accident where to happen, and the fault traced back to the B&Q-screws instead of approved screws, well… let’s just say the lawyers would be working double shifts.
For bulky stuff we will book space on a cargo plane. If required we will even charter a full plane, all the way up to Antonov 124s. Flying anything is rather expensive (I won’t go into rates, as you’ll no doubt understand), so we book ocean container whenever the desired transit times make this possible.
What might also help is to resize in steps. Resize down in, say, 200px intervals.
The powers that be adviced us to spread our assets over several (preferably stable) banks. So I have now got 264 accounts.
The powers that be adviced us to spread our assets over several (preferably stable) banks. So I have now got 264 accounts.
BBC originally reported it as a US ‘Falcon’ on their website, seems to have changed now though.
Could have been a US Dassault Falcon though. I know fur sure the US Coast Guard uses them, possibly other branches as well. Not really that up to date on the USAF biz-jet fleet.
A few times driving to FRA and back on a daytrip, a little over 3 hours in good traffic. Add in the inevitable “baustellen” and “staus” and you end up with a 3,5 or 4 hours drive one way.
Then there was that daytrip by plane from NRN to SXF about 4 years ago. That was one hell of a day, actually, two days as I missed the last bus. There is a long trip report somewhere in the archives, just search for “Flying VBird”.
Came somewhat close to doing a handcarry from China to Europe. For those that are unfamiliar with the term, it means collecting a very urgent package and flying it back. Usually that package will go in the cabin as handluggage, hence the term. Anyway, someone in scheduling must have been short on airmiles. In the end Canadian collegue flew to China, then flew with the package to Europe, and then let him fly back to Canada. 😮
I’ve had much the same problem for a very long time with my previous Canon 10D. I am fairly certain it has a depth of field problem. This is actually a well known problem for the 10D. The camera was perfect for side-on shots, even with low speed panning. For anything at an angle I would always have part of the plane slighly out of focus. Similar to the nose of your 757 shot.
At one point I even sent the lense back for a check-up, as I was under the mistaken impression the lense was to blame. The lense got a clean bill of health, but the problem persisted. So either it was a problem with my shooting technique, or with the body.
While I never tried to get the 10D diagnosed (the price quoted for the diagnosis alone made it beyond economical), I know it must have been the camera. After I got a new camera the problem went away. So I do not think my shooting technique was to blame.
At the end of the day your camera is a piece of precision engineering. Anything can break.
What camera have you got?
It was all over the news when it happened, and photos are to be found at jetphotos, airliners and a lot of other sites.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1928708/posts
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6109518&nseq=3
The RAAF Townsville website lists [email]info@raafmuseum.com[/email] as their contact adress.
The RAAF Townsville website lists [email]info@raafmuseum.com[/email] as their contact adress.
There is a compicated leasing deal going on between FlyBE, SAS and their susbidary Wideroe. I couldn’t get my head round it when It was explained to me by an EXT local. But basically long story shot: FlyBE have taken some of SAS’s retired fleet of Q400s (after the ladning gear accidents last year) to fill in for FlyBE while they wait for their orders to be delivered from Bombardier. SAS originally intended for these aircraft to go to Wideroe, but (I can’t remember why) they were not able to fly them at the time. So they came up with a lease deal with Flybe.
There was another element to it, I think some of FlyBE’s orders went to wideroe or something for a short term lease as well.So I assume it has something to do with that.
So what you are saying is that FlyBE has leased the planes from SAS pending delivery of their new-build planes. Then as new-builds are delivered the older ones are tranferred to Wideroe?
What I do not understand is that G-ECOE is a new-build? Did FlyBE agree to take the older DHC-8s, and trade them in for their newly delivered DHC-8s? Why would they possibly want to do that. And why would they fly the plane for 2 months, and then send them to Wideroe. Why not straight from Canada to Norway?
This actually opens up even more questions. For instance, why is SAS accepting DHC-8s in the first place. If another incident where to happen the media will simply butcher Wideroe and SAS. They’d have a field day. That’s a big risk SAS are running. Especially considering SAS’s public announcement the planes would be retired and the rather open accusations SAS made towards Bombardier!
Heck, even without an incident the media could throw accusations at SAS. The plane has a very bad reputation in Scandinavia for obvious reasons.