So how would your SEAD platform distinguish between a cellphone and any mil grade cryptic datalink..?

Well , i would say that they use different frequency and even if they use the same frequency i dont think a normal cell phone signal is encripted in the similar fashion as a military one. Alternatively, they could use a communication jammer such as tiger pod or AN/USQ-113 to increase the background noise .Transmit datalink signal weaker than that background and you cant communicate. Transmit datalink stronger than that background and you will need more power which a simple cell phone cant provide.Thus, these SEAD assets can now distingush between civilian cell phone and military datalink

mirage F1

Detecting (and geolocating, are you serious?) the kind of data link they use by RWR….good luck with that.

Yes iam serious , why not ? technically speaking, datalink is just a form of electronic signal not really all that different from radar signal ( moreover unlike radar signal most datalinks are not even designed to focus their beam in one direction ) .And geolocate ground emitter with RWR is nothing new, there a dozen ways to do it.

Yes, and ?
With all respect it seems me that you there are looking at a forest and seeing just trees .
It is not 5 , 7 or 10 minutes what matter (just the curiosity: how much time it takes to a strike mission on a pretermined target to just take off? ) is the fact that the whole systems is coinceved to be:
-higly mobile
– redundant
-overlapping
-networkcentered
– multisensor
and with CIWS and jammers everywhere to protect batteries and radar.
So the idea of detecting such asset with a satellite (this what the idea of starfish prime) is simply absurd.
You have also to consider that limitations they have, like the one of radar horizon need appropriate tactics to be exploited: let’s forget launching SDB from 20K altitude.
And just don’t try to fly F-22 (but also F-15E) like we europeans did with Tornado during Cold War also.

IMHO satellite image is more for locating OTH radar which are static most of the time due to their enomous size. Anyway,what iam trying to say is : S-300, S-400 batteries components cannot constantly moving like short range air defense such as Tor-M1 or a ZSU-23-4 , realisticly they would need 20-30 minutes set up time and when they are moving they cant operate as a air defense system(which is a big deal because they can be located when they transmit or launch missiles ).Moreover ,to be networked you need a link between those batteries ,if you want a secretive link you would use electric cable which mean those component cant be located very far from the other , and not very mobile.If you use wireless datalink then obviously those missiles launched and command port are not silent anymore ,thus can be geolocated by RWR.It is always a matter of trade off , nothing is perfect. Then the next thing to consider is that the main role of strike aircraft is not to destroy air defense but rather destroy important structures and strategic targets .Those SAM batteries may be very hard to find if they are silent and moving all the time , but when they do moving and turn off radar then they are not doing their intended job.

3-MiG-29 has 15 deg AOA and 7G limitation above M0,85. It simply cannot have such linear ITR envelope.

Isnt F-16 also structure limited to 8.5G above Mach 0.65 according to this ? or do i read it wrong ?

When looking for Mig-29 manual ,i found this piece
Is it just me or the graph a bit off ? for example :in intatanous turn rate part , the 9 G envelope of Mig-29 is clearly bigger , why is F-16 evelope labed superior ? , and why the 9G sustain evelope of Mig-29 missing ?

P/S: manual for Russian AC is really hard to find

bla bla bla
I have good idea about my knowledge. I hardly impressed with yours.

Whatever not so surprise that people put you in ignore list and i couldn’t care less if a moron is not impressed by my knowledge .

Early 1980s Flanker radars were in 100km class. they were 4 times less effective than Irbis which was tested more than a decade. Flanker size and shape hasn’t changed. Fighter radar has limitations interms of heat and powersupply.
every thing is ground breaking. Russia do have unlimited money. Its Oil/Gas, nuclear power industry and whole government has lowest debts and lowest tax rates of any advanced country.
where are those EA-18G/F-16J based and what is there range as the latest SAMs will hit the tankers first to put all the fighters out of the way from battlefield. that is without entry of MIG-31BM and attacking from stratosphere.
without Russian effective bombardment in Syria. the ISIS in Irak would never have been defeated . your 100,00k sorties are either tanker or transport or without weopons. without Russian entry the Turkey behavior towards ISIS would never had changed. that’s why I said all you are writing is nonsense.

Basically, you cant point out which exact radar system get range improve by 100 times ,you cant give any figures to show that Russian done more sorties or has less collateral damage ,you think power supply remain the same if outer shape doesnt change , you think Russia has unlimited money , along with tons of BS about SAM ..etc.That it , either you are ridiculously dumb or just trolling .Nevertheless, iam done with you.Dont know why i even bothered to talk to you in the first place, waste of time