However SM6 has some drawbacks:

Depend on AWACS to increase range (>400km with E2D)

. The purpose of AWACS or 3 party guide is to extend radar horizon again low altitude targets ( this is the same case for all kind of surface launched missiles not just SM-6). In case of DF-21, it is a ballistic missiles, ballistic missiles do not, in any situation, cruising at low altitude, so third party guide for SM-6 isnot necessary ( at the altitude that DF-21 flying, radar horizon will be in order of thounsands km) .
p/s : OP, no offense but i think your understandingof basic physics is very shallow so you really should improve it first , otherwise everyone here will just keep making fun of you, which personally i find it not very nice.

Russian prefer to spend their money into the targeting system aboard of their planes instead than in the ammo itself, precision is just slightly worse but the cost is way inferior.

a slightly worse accuracy is a very exaggerated statement,again stationary target, precision of dumb bombs is ways worse than guided bomb. Again moving target, it pretty much pure luck to hit them with dumb bombs.
And you are talking like Western aircraft doesn’t have targeting system at all.

The Su-35S..

sukhoi family (su-27 and it’s various version all have structure G limit of 6G with full internal fuel tank)
P/s :please use normal aircraft name like normal people, intentionally miss spell is very childish

I think in hindsight that Northrop Mc Donnell Douglas’s YF-23 could be the new JSF.
the F-35 is a complete waste of time and money when you have PAV 1 & PAV 2 sat collecting dust, when they could be developed as the new fighter bomber.
She has large weapons bays a longer range than the F-22 and is stealthier.

money does not grow on tree , redesigning YF-23 for STOVL and CAPTOR would be extremely expensive , een the airfrorce version gonna be much more expensive than f-35

True she doesn’t have STOVL but why design a bird for 3 different missions? All those tax dollars going to waste
.

It is even more expensive to design aircraft that only fit their specific mission

Another set of great observations by TomcatVip & Hopsalot, thanx, my votes are fun 4/5, content 0/5.

The highlighted area above is the MultiFunctional Antenna GaN AESA to be used as RWR, directional data links and possibly (?) active radar,

if you talking about the wing tip then a radar of that size would be close to useless to detect anything further than 1-2 km

Is directional GaN EW suite & directional datalinks 6 gen? Perhaps since some of it obviously isn’t present in “5”gen.

directional EW and datalink are present on 5 gen too

Because SEAD/DEAD missions are not carried out against centralized, immobile targets somehwere in nowhere and unprotected. They have early warning radars, procedure to send interceptors and focusing their search on the coordinates of VHF radars. .

The early warning radar will be detect and located by asq-239

The VHF radars would so take care of the first part of the acquisition sequence, looking throught the whole sky in Wide search mode, they will detect incoming aircraft and give an initial assestment of its own position and ABOVE ALL route and pass the information to the decimetrical and centimetrical that would search just that portion of sky using narrow o even a spot on search mode , using such modes resolution and the range increase dramatically as they concentrate their power beam in just a portion of sky in order to reduce the acquisition boxes after they would pass the obtained data to SAM batteries that would launch missiles.using their own radars to do mid course guidance, usually such radar would be positioned at a consistent distance one from the other and would so illuminate the targets from different directions.
Give a look to the document Ozair has send there is a good illustration of how the NEBO_M i.e. their latest operative air defense radar complex operate.

No offence but i think you have a wrong perception of how a radar works , when they say a radar have FoV of 120 degree or 360 degrees , that doesnt mean it will transmit a beam that is 120 degrees wide , the beam of fire control radar is normally only 1-2 degrees wide.You can focus the radar beam but only to a certain extend ( the limit is what we called gain )

For what I have seen looking into VHF radars brochures even the most modest ones claim a probable location errors of some hundreds of meters while ARh missiles ones claim their own seekes ranges in order of several kilometers or tenth of kilometers also, even in the case of low RCS targets.
.

I think you mistaken between the range error and the angular error , iam talking about the angular error due to wide beam width