dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Take a look at this!! #2098458
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Take a look at this!!

    Don’t worry Steve,she was actually pretty well concealed most of the time,so she was actually quite easy to miss.I’m not sure I’d have noticed her either if I hadn’t seen a news article in Flypast about her.The Golden Apple SilverStar was in bits in the hangar at the time,and the Zero was stored behind all the odds and ends from the T33,with a couple of tarpaulins thrown in for good measure.The Zero was apparently missing various bits such as undercarriage parts and it never had an engine with it,which explains why she was never assembled.

    in reply to: Peter-'Just Jane' video #2098512
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Peter-‘Just Jane’ video

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 17-12-02 AT 00:08 AM (GMT)]Thanks David,I can understand she’d have had a pretty rough time with all the moves she been subjected to in the past.By ‘how she was dismantled’,do you mean rough handling or something more severe?They wouldn’t have chopped through the spar at some point would they?? *shiver*

    in reply to: General Discussion #390167
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Ghosts

    Hi bluetooth,
    The ‘bumps in the night’ are down to things like floorboards contracting as the room temperature cools.The heating goes off and the nights are usually colder than the days,so you always get this cracking,creaking cooling off period,often just when you go to bed.I’m sure there’s nothing sinister to it…*dark shadow creeps up behind him…*

    in reply to: Ghosts #1969864
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Ghosts

    Hi bluetooth,
    The ‘bumps in the night’ are down to things like floorboards contracting as the room temperature cools.The heating goes off and the nights are usually colder than the days,so you always get this cracking,creaking cooling off period,often just when you go to bed.I’m sure there’s nothing sinister to it…*dark shadow creeps up behind him…*

    in reply to: Peter-'Just Jane' video #2098536
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Peter-‘Just Jane’ video

    Hi Peter,
    I hope Lancman don’t mind me butting in,but I think I can answer your post.Poor old NX611 used to be displayed at the Blackpool Air Centre for a number of years after she was grounded by HAC,the people who used to operate her.All that salty air didn’t do the poor girl too much good.Her engines were run occasionally but geerally her condition deteriorated.Just look at the poor old Vulcan that’s still there!This ‘trauma’ has left her with a few salt corrosion issues in various bits of the airframe, and it seems that the wing spars may have suffered some ill effects.

    in reply to: Take a look at this!! #2098542
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Take a look at this!!

    Hi Steve,
    The OFMC machine was never assembled while it was at Duxford.It used to be stored off to one side in the OFMC hangar behind various bits n’ pieces of thier Canadair Silver Star.I’ve posted a pic of it below,along with the IWM’s wreck which is awaiting some attention.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3dfe243700eb5930.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3dfe246501cea5ee.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #390485
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Ghosts

    Generally I reckon ghost sightings and the like can be attributed to scientific and/or psychological causes,but there are one or two stories I’ve heard that are quite intriguing.One of these was when a friend of my dad’s was cleaning in a church in the Midlands.While she was dusting away,she saw a hooded figure walk down the aisle at one side of the church,and disappear through a door,seemingly without opening it,into the sacrasty (priests changing room.)Although she only caught a glimpse of this chap in full,she noticed that he seemed to have no lower legs,and seemed to be walking under the level of the floor.
    Intrigued by the whole episode,she did some research and found that not only had the church once been part of a monastry,but that in more recent years some renovation work had been done which had raised the floor level a couple of feet.I dunno about you,but I find that pretty compelling.I know this lady was niether mad nor daft,and she wasn’t the sort to make this stuff up,she wasn’t even keen to talk about it.
    I know you could say that the whole thing was a vision and the floor level thing was a coincidence,but it doesn’t strike me personally as such.
    Having said that,I’m not really a believer in the supernatural,and I accept that there could be a good explanaition for it.Any ideas?

    in reply to: Ghosts #1970115
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Ghosts

    Generally I reckon ghost sightings and the like can be attributed to scientific and/or psychological causes,but there are one or two stories I’ve heard that are quite intriguing.One of these was when a friend of my dad’s was cleaning in a church in the Midlands.While she was dusting away,she saw a hooded figure walk down the aisle at one side of the church,and disappear through a door,seemingly without opening it,into the sacrasty (priests changing room.)Although she only caught a glimpse of this chap in full,she noticed that he seemed to have no lower legs,and seemed to be walking under the level of the floor.
    Intrigued by the whole episode,she did some research and found that not only had the church once been part of a monastry,but that in more recent years some renovation work had been done which had raised the floor level a couple of feet.I dunno about you,but I find that pretty compelling.I know this lady was niether mad nor daft,and she wasn’t the sort to make this stuff up,she wasn’t even keen to talk about it.
    I know you could say that the whole thing was a vision and the floor level thing was a coincidence,but it doesn’t strike me personally as such.
    Having said that,I’m not really a believer in the supernatural,and I accept that there could be a good explanaition for it.Any ideas?

    in reply to: General Discussion #390490
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: re-incarnation

    Hi geedee,interesting topic.In short,no I don’t believe in reincarnation.The idea that you come back as something else after you die just doesn’t ring true for me.I don’t much fancy spending my next life as a slug or a beetle anyway.
    Just to pick up on summat you said about stone slabs over graves,I think this has more to do with resurrection than reincarnation, resurrection being the idea that you might one day be brought back from the dead as opposed to being made into something else and living life all over again.Just thinking about it,I don’t believe in resurrection either.

    in reply to: re-incarnation #1970118
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: re-incarnation

    Hi geedee,interesting topic.In short,no I don’t believe in reincarnation.The idea that you come back as something else after you die just doesn’t ring true for me.I don’t much fancy spending my next life as a slug or a beetle anyway.
    Just to pick up on summat you said about stone slabs over graves,I think this has more to do with resurrection than reincarnation, resurrection being the idea that you might one day be brought back from the dead as opposed to being made into something else and living life all over again.Just thinking about it,I don’t believe in resurrection either.

    in reply to: Take a look at this!! #2098680
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Take a look at this!!

    Hi Sparky,
    I shouldn’t think this is the machine that was with OFMC as that was a later model.This machine has apparently been scratchbuilt rather than being a restoration of an original,rather like FlugWerke and thier 190’s.I’m pretty certain the fuselage frame in the background is a T6 Harvard/Texan,which made me wonder if this was some sort of T6-based Zero lookalike,but it doesn’t appear to be.

    in reply to: General Discussion #391084
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Plane age

    The oldest plane I’ve flown in was also the first I ever flew in-
    G-BETO,a 1962-built Moraine-Saulnier MS885 Super Rallye.A mate of my brother was part of a syndicate operating her out of a farm strip near Swindon.My first flight,over ten years ago now,was to Compton Abbas,and we got buzzed by some extremely low flying RAF Hercs on our way back to the plane from the airfield cafe.Nearly took our heads off,but I thought it was pretty cool.:)
    Sadly,she was badly bent about 5 years ago by another pilot,and she was sold on and replaced by a Cessna 172 which is still going strong.
    Up until recently I thought poor old BETO had gone for scrap,but she shows up on the CAA website as being airworthy again with a new syndicate.Happy news! 🙂
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3dfa50b4f7f1a0f3.jpg

    in reply to: Plane age #1970435
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Plane age

    The oldest plane I’ve flown in was also the first I ever flew in-
    G-BETO,a 1962-built Moraine-Saulnier MS885 Super Rallye.A mate of my brother was part of a syndicate operating her out of a farm strip near Swindon.My first flight,over ten years ago now,was to Compton Abbas,and we got buzzed by some extremely low flying RAF Hercs on our way back to the plane from the airfield cafe.Nearly took our heads off,but I thought it was pretty cool.:)
    Sadly,she was badly bent about 5 years ago by another pilot,and she was sold on and replaced by a Cessna 172 which is still going strong.
    Up until recently I thought poor old BETO had gone for scrap,but she shows up on the CAA website as being airworthy again with a new syndicate.Happy news! 🙂
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3dfa50b4f7f1a0f3.jpg

    in reply to: MK IX Spitfire handling #2098717
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: You asked about current aircraft

    One for Kiethmac,or anyone else who happens to know the answer:
    I’d been lead to believe that if you have a choice between manual feed and fuel booster pump then the booster pump should be switched off for take off.The theory behind this,allegedly,is that there is less chance of faliure of the manual feed than the booster pump.Booster pump flakes out on take off=nice big pile of wreckage in the next field.I seem to remember this theory is mentioned in the pilot’s notes for a few warbirds,and I’m sure that it’s stated in the pilot’s notes for the P38 Lightning.So,is it different depending on the specific aircraft type,or have I been lead up the garden path all along?

    in reply to: General Discussion #391505
    Ant.H
    Participant

    RE: Just curious…….

    I don’t know,nor want to know what star sign I am.The whole thing is a pile of poo IMHO,so I’m not bothered.My birthday is in early April so I’m whatever sign that makes me.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 2,663 total)