Cometguy, yes the wing-mounted Browning was standard.
I’m by no means an expert on Blenheims, but being as nobody else has commented…
The wireless sets appear to have been mounted aft of the turret, ie. in the rear fuselage between the turret and the tail. With a bit of Googling I’ve found reference to T.1154 (transmitter) and R.1155 (receiver) being fitted, although this was to the Bisley/Blenheim Mk.V.
As for turrets, there were different turret types used as production went on, all of them Bristol designs. B.I, II, III and IIIa (semi-retractable, single or twin Vickers K), B.IV (twin Browning) used on Blenheim Mk.IV and lastly the distinctive B.X turret on the Mk.V/Bisley (twin Browning).
As far as I’m aware, the fuselage seat was a kind of safety seat for take-off, landing and emergencies.
Many thanks RG for commenting, the one great problem with forums and social media etc is the lack of comment and first hand info from those involved, which leads in turn to rumours and speculation. It’s posts like yours that help to keep things civil and well informed.
FL at Sywell should be a very interesting experience, yes Dux was great but a change of scenery and display axis etc could work wonders. I was last at a Sywell show in 2015 and had a great time, the place certainly has period atmosphere.
There’s a fairly well-told story about a pilot of a new-built Fairey Firefly up on a test flight from Fairey’s Heathrow works bumping into a new-built Halifax up on an air test from Leavesden. Firefly pilot bounced the Hali, thinking it would be easy meat, only to find the Hali turning inside him and ending up on his tail within seconds.
Not a scientific reply, but thought I’d mention it as a demo of what was possible, albeit lightly loaded and in daylight.
As one of the “silent followers” of this thread, I thought I’d better pop-up and say that I do follow this thread and enjoy it very much. Many thanks for everything you and the Stirling team are doing.
Forum traffic has certainly taken a tumble since the infamous update, and I’m here far less often than I used to be.
There seem to be a large number of Key refugees over on UKAR, you could perhaps put a sister thread on there?
Hi Geoff,
I’m sorry to report that Rudy passed away in May, aged 89. The following link is a good tribute to him.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
Wow, the time flies! I almost went to the BoB show in 2000 but plans changed at last minute and I passed my ticket to someone else, who then showed me lots of pics of just how great show was. Doh!
Loved ‘983 in that Piece of Cake scheme, even if it wasn’t historically correct. If my numbers came up, I’d love to put NH238 back in the air in those colours.
My choice would be the Buchon with DB engine over in Germany, although I think it has only flown with a Merlin up front in recent years.
The Halifax had several problems in its earlier forms, the nacelles and many of the exhaust styles for the Merlin installation were very draggy (the aircraft as a whole was a bit draggy too). Added to this were prop vibration, poor exhaust flame damping and those famously dangerous triangular fins. This doesn’t cover all the problems, but gives some idea. It’s enlightening to note that loss rates on Merlin Halifax squadrons were worse than those of the Stirling, and it’s only the record of the later Halifax models that saves the type from being remembered as the worst of the RAF heavy bombers.
There were refinements as production went along, so by the time the switch had been made to Hercules power with the Mk.III, the airframe was in a much better state to make use of the extra power and the aircraft was aerodynamically safe to fly.
Very late in the war the Hercules 100, with a redesigned intake and surpercharger, became available and these were fitted to Mk.VI Halifax. Combined with the extended wing tips, this made for a leap in ceiling and overall performance.
As far as I’m aware, the Canadian Mosquito (Bob Jens’ VR976) flew a handful of times after restoration in 2014/2015 but hasn’t flown since. The three NZ rebuilds now in the US are really the only ones that can be considered airworthy, and even then the future of the Flying Heritage example is in doubt at the moment…
Done!!
The oft-quoted figure is around fifty, so you’re on safe ground quoting that number I would have thought.
Enjoy that Spit, a rounded rudder Mk.IX is a lot of people’s idea of the perfect Spitfire. Such unusual markings too, a good opportunity to talk about the contribution of the Czechs and other nationalities in the wartime RAF and the difficult days that followed in post-war Czechoslovakia.
The general consensus in various places is that this project was a very comfy job that was dragged on as long as possible, end result was lots of money for relatively little progress. How Lufthansa kept paying into this project over so many years and not realising what was going on is hard to understand.
End results:
An airline that was backing historic aircraft in a major way has completely backed out of flying any of their aircraft.
The Starliner itself was cut up for transport after the project was abandoned and will certainly never fly again.
Lots of really good spare parts were gathered together for the project, many of which were simply binned when the project was abandoned.
Just imagine what that kind of money could have accomplished in the right hands, it’s sickening…
Yes it sounds very much like the recently re-flown T.72, now XE688 and formerly PP-XHH with Embraer in Brazil.
Yes please SandyK, always of interest.
Looks to me like a relatively modern pic of AB910, she has a modern whip aerial under the starboard wing. She also has the correct Siamese exhausts which were only fitted in recent years. Seem to remember she flew regularly with this combo of four blade prop and Siamese exhausts when she was in 303sqn colours about ten years ago.