There’s a picture of ZD230 in semi-scrapped state on airliners.net. Pic was taken a month ago, so she may well have been completely scrapped by now.
Too late for most of them already mate, the Trident has got the chop already and the 707 was being rapidly reduced aswell,if it hasn’t been already. See the link…
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=56892&highlight=Cosford
Hi Jules,
The page on the link below gives some information on the ‘Irving’ fighter. It seems it was a twin-engined heavy fighter, rather than a model of Zero.
http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/nakairving.htm
MJR,
As I understand it, Red Bull have agreed to sponsor the Sea Vixen for this year at least.
I’m sincerely hoping the Trident 1 is not going to chopped up to produce the cockpit section mentioned above. Coford’s G-ARPH is the only complete preserved example of a Trident 1 anywhere!:(
The Japanese aircraft looks to me like a Nakajima B5N ‘Kate’ torpedo bomber, rather than an Aichi ‘Val’. The Val’s wing folding point was further out toward the tips, and the canopy with it’s three sliding portions is distinctively ‘Kate’.
I was in the Galleria today and had a good look at the Comet replica. Although I’ve been working in Hatfield the last couple of months, I’d not previously ventured into the “Gonorrhea”!
Looking out from the upper floor of the place you get a good view of the area that was once the airfield and I have to say I’m stunned by how quickly the various buildings have shot up on the old airfield site. You’d deserve a prize for guessing it was ever an airfield.
Janie,I’d be very interested in hearing about any development plans for the old DH offices, please do pass on any info.
Just a slight correction, Roald Dahl’s book is called ‘Going Solo’.
Sadly, the cockpit of G-ARPK was finally deemed too damaged and corroded to be restored and turned into the simulater as planned, so the aircraft was scrapped entirely.
There’s progress being made on the AVP’s Trident Three G-AWZK, but the majority is on the interior so far. Assembly of the wings,tail etc is due to begin in the near future.
For anyone interested in Tridents, the Trident Preservation Society have a website and active discussion forum devoted to the type.
“Wasn’t the whole reason for the P-39’s mid-engined design to place the engine at the centre of gravity ??…..
….and thereby improve manouvreability ??”
Well, partly that’s true. The P38 and P39 were both designed to the same specification (X608), which amongst other things specified the fitting of a single 37mm canon. Due to the size,weight and recoil of such a weapon the only sensible place to mount it was down the centreline, this being one of the key reasons why Lockheed went for a twin-engined design.
The solution on the ’39 was to mount the weapon in the nose,firing through the prop hub, hence the need to move the engine back to the middle of the aircraft. As far as I’m aware, the US never developed an engine that could mount a gun through the middle of it, as with the Daimler Benz 601,605 etc.
As I’ve heard it, the Spit replica was severely damaged in a landing accident a few years ago. The engine failed to respond when the pilot attempted a go-around, the result being a heavy landing in the field beyond which did substantial damage, including tearing off one of the wings.
A very interesting and enjoyable thread. 🙂
Just to clear a couple of technical points up, the P63 was quite a different aircraft to the P39, with few interchangeable parts between the two. The ’63 had “laminar flow” wings amongst other features, which gave it a better performance compared to the ’39 in addition to the extra supercharging.
Secondly, the P38 always had turbochargers fitted from the prototype onwards, the positioning of the turbochargers being one of the reasons for the aircraft’s unusual twin-boom configuration. The only Lightnings without them were the 332F(French) and 332B(British) export models, and these never saw action. Early P38 models did have some engine troubles, particularly in Europe, but as I’ve heard it this was more to do with the intercoolers and other ancillaries.
After some Googling and hunting around the net, the episode of Poirot is called “The Incredible Theft”, filmed in 1989. The basic plot is that the blueprints for a brand new fighter plane called the “Mayfield Kestrel” have been stolen from the designer’s study. MH434 appears in a take-off and display scene masquerading as the “Kestrel” with Ray at the helm, ‘434 being painted in the high-altitude light grey scheme she wore in the late 80’s.
Just seen this pic of an RAAF F111 on A.net. I reckon the people on the roof needed a change of undies after this one!
WF410 and the Trident 2E, G-AVFM, were both scrapped in 2004. The Trident’s cockpit section was saved, but the Varsity was scrapped entirely. Looking at the picture of both in the most recent Wrecks & Relics it’s not hard to understand why nothing of the Varsity was saved. 🙁