I know, not reasonable. I have just been reading Yefim Gordons book, so had ’31’s on the brain. I didn;t mean to imply stealth, but thinking if they could be sitting 300-400km away keeping an eye on things with their reputedly very long range radar.
Nice plot twist, but about as plausible as a shark attack in a paddling pool …
I think it went wrong at the ‘What was not seen’ part. 😉
Hi Christoph, not sure what it is, but I can assure it is not a 109 engine cover, nor a 109 panel of any kind.
Just adding some of the relevant recent Canadian news articles from the F-35 thread (oldest at the top).
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f-35-purchase-decision-expected-next-week-in-report-1.2666758
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/05/us-lockheed-martin-canada-f-idUSKBN0EG2P820140605
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1184545-one-dead-pilot-9-june-2014-byers-embargoed-2.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/12/canada-fighter-idUSL2N0OT0VU20140612
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/100b-defence-spending-plan-laid-out-for-industry-1.2677510
Certainly not an armada, but an interesting mix:
1 Tupolev Tu-22M “Backfire” bomber
4 Sukhoi Su-27 ‘Flanker’ fighters
1 Beriev A50 ‘Mainstay’ early warning aircraft
1 An-26 ‘Curl’ transport aircraft
What was not seen was the 4 Mig-31’s with R-37’s out of radar range watching the Typhoon’s welcome party. 🙂
Panel to back Ottawa’s jet decision on F-35s
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/panel-to-back-ottawas-jet-decision-on-f-35s/article19085304/
To summarize the article, an independant panel approves of the new process to determine Canada’s future fighter (this is not approval of the F35 itself).
The IRB (requirement that defence contractors/suppliers reinvest in the country) is just that… a policy, not a law. There are many many greater reasons to not get the F-35 than IRB non-compliance. :-).
Still, when it is all said and done I fear it was what will be in Canadian skies come sometime post 2020.
I kind of like the Su-35 with a mix of Su-34’s. I think they would be much more practical for patrolling Canada’s long borders and arctic north. The Rafale would probably be my 2nd pick. F/A-18F is likely the logical winner if the F-35 fails.
Not knowing the tidal process over there, I am thinking could you temporarily dam up an area around the p-38, sump out the water and with sufficient digging around still buried sections, and high pressure hosed water to clear out the fuselage of sand, just crane it out. Or, if feasible, as mentioned break it down to it’s component parts.
Supermarine Seafire XVII Wings
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/281325251711?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
I really like the cutaway. If you were do a 3d printing of that and sell it as a model kit…
I cannot guarantee the authenticity of these, but here you go:
http://spitfiresite.com/2010/04/spitfire-cufflinks-from-tmb-art-metal.html
http://www.tmbartmetal.com/product-pages/piston-desk-clocks/spitfire-x4276klb-piston-clock.html
Well, I guess it could be melted down and make cute little ‘einkel shaped paperweights to sell.
The one at Duxford was origionaly going to be made airworthy by OFMC. Unfortunatly it was far to gone and only good for static restoration. I have heard that it might even be to far gone for that!Phill
It is not so much it is a merlin…although I think it was a crazy thing to do either way. But it was the engine of one of Al Deere’s spitfires. A certified RAF ace and BoB ace. A truly historic piece. I am sure if they had made an inquiry to a few museums in New Zealand, australia or even england…it would have found a home in no time.
Great piece, thank you for sharing. Please share the work on the Ar396/96 as well. Cheers
I don’t know about best overall fighter…there are too many variables.
But of the fighters listed in the original post, I think the aeroplane I would want to be flying into combat with on or after Sept 2,1945 would be the Me262.
You pretty much have your pick of engagement parameters…and escape if necessary.