dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2252079
    mack8
    Participant

    Quite a stunner. Thank you Paralay! :applause:

    in reply to: No fly zone in Syria #2252736
    mack8
    Participant

    This is just like the Iran-Iraq war, remember that? For EIGHT years it went, over 2 million victims… the israelis and the americans were supporting Iran, and the americans and their “allies” were supporting Iraq. Yep, you read that right.
    Btw look at how the syrian civil war went, first the “rebels” seemed to be winning, but suddenly the weapons transfers dried out, so the government was slowly pushing back. Now the weapons (and possibly “liberating” bombs) will flow again and the whole cycle will repeat itself. We’re “barely” into HUNDRED THOUSAND dead, long way to go folks, long way to go… 🙁

    in reply to: No fly zone in Syria #2252798
    mack8
    Participant

    Ignoring replying to the racist, xenophobe garbage about the peoples from ME from the usual suspects posted here (either endorsed with a low IQ like the right wingers are usually, or serving certain interests), the russians say that all this chemical weapons hysteria fed to the western world to justify a new war – very profitable for the likes of LM and Raytheon and Texaco etc. etc.- is FABRICATED LIES. (also i might add it serves as wonderful deflection from the revealings of Edward Snowden, how very convenient isn’t it ? Those news are mostly forgotten now , but i haven’t forgot. If some NSA psychopath is reading this, **** *** !) I believe the russians 100% (WMDs in Iraq anyone?). So like i was saying not long ago, we’ve reached the position in which if someone with an open mind, not wanting to be an obedient sheep, wants to have idea of what’s happening in the world, they have to follow the russian ( and chinese) media.

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2252838
    mack8
    Participant

    Thanks Paralay, that was quick! I just remembered though , in that cjdby thread there are actually some datas for it, including what i interpret to be combat radius, listed as 3200km.
    Actually i saved that stuff, length 29m, wingspan 22m, bay length 10.5m, bay width 2.5m, small bay 4.5 m long

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2252890
    mack8
    Participant

    SFC- Specific fuel consumption of a 15-20 tons class engine (WS-15 ?) to try to estimate a rough figure for range/combat radius based on (estimated) fuel capacity.

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2252904
    mack8
    Participant

    How much fuel would you estimate this JH-X thing could carry Paralay ? How about a rough estimate of engine SFC and rough estimate of range/combat radius? Thanks.

    in reply to: No fly zone in Syria #2253577
    mack8
    Participant

    ******! The *******s, another war in the making, another few millions of lives destroyed like they’re not already… all this will turn on them one day though. No empire lasts forever.

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2253582
    mack8
    Participant

    Strange, it works every time for me, anyway here it is, copyright Paralay @paralay.com.
    He estimates a weight of 68 tons, speed of M1,6 and need of 15-20 tons class engines.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]217588[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2253595
    mack8
    Participant

    Here are some freshly made drawings and some estimates as to weight, performance etc. by Paralay ( i was actually going to ask him if he can do some of his unique drawings for this JH-X!)
    http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?style=12&f=5&t=2677

    mack8
    Participant

    In fairness, especially that M2.42 figure must have been calculated based on what Metz said. He might have casually said sixteen hundred miles an hour by rounding the real figure up, but i won’t expect him, especially in public (and given the american paranoid secrecy), and also given the need of showing his employers’ product in the best light, to quote a more exact figure. It could very well be the maximum speed is 1550 mph or 1560 mph etc. Also i think Paralay himself brought the subject of suitability of F-22’s fixed intakes for such speeds. Of course, i’m just saying, i’m no expert here and i could be totally wrong.

    I guess same applies for T-50, of course.

    mack8
    Participant

    Speed wise, one of the most important things is materials. M2.83 is different in this respect from even M2.5, let alone M2.35

    mack8
    Participant

    You and me both. 🙂 But that is what one can expect from one of the main channels really, they are making this report for average joe, not us nutcases. There are also some more spesific news, however, take them with huge huge grain of salt, as they are basically impossible to prove right at this point:

    This was apparently “measured” by radio scanners, but the source is second hand.

    Thanks for the info on 052 Berkut, indeed i missed your post, and interesting details like above. Imo, even if the actual performance tested/measured is TWENTY percent less than what’s rumoured, it’s still remarcable. Imagine if the above is actually more or less true, god T-50 this will be a killer, and even more so with the new Type 30 engines!
    What are the “high” figures quoted for F-22, supercruise at M1.72 and max sped of M2.42, right ( though of course perhaps sizable amounts of salt are required here too)?
    Btw, anything new on T-50-5, still slated to fly in the “second half of the year”, any idea when ? Thanks.

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2253982
    mack8
    Participant

    Great stuff! They talk about finishing the first stage of the flight trials i think , but i can’t make more than that. Anyone can “eyeball” 051’s behaviour during the spin trials? Also , anyone knows how many flights the program has to date, and what’s the story with 052 , we haven’t seen it for some time. Thanks.

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2254555
    mack8
    Participant

    In other words, this JH-X ( hope i’m not far away with the designation , because fan speculation appears to show it carrying AAMs, sorta like JH-7 does) might be a complement for the H-X flying wing. How cool would that be if it turns to be real? 😉

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2254577
    mack8
    Participant

    Did the libyans ever got their money back ?

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 2,087 total)