I work for Monarch, and believe you me, we have our fair share of delays. We try and offload to other airlines though to protect the passengers against big delays.
The A300 is a large contributor to our delays – it is too unreliable.
Well judging from this thread, Monarch may even gain business 😮 from this move as most people on here think it is a good move. The majority of airlines are going to go this way eventually – even the likes of the major national airlines like Iberia, as mentioned above. I’m sure Monarch will miss you very much though! 😉
Oh, and it’s only no frills if you don’t buy anything!! 😀
“Continental become the first airline to introduce flambé food”
“Engineers cook the wrong wings on the BBQ”
“Continental Engineers install the first ex-Concorde after-burners on their fleet”
Airlines have to operate a certain number of flights on each routing, otherwise they could lose the slots at an airport. Sometimes, this means an airline operating on particular days with low loads in order to keep their historical slot rights.
My parents landed at Gerona the day before the Britannia crash landing.
NCLRULES -The Monarch A330 also operates a SFB flight at the weekends through NCL.
A321 Vs. B757
The reason why the A321 operates alongside the B757 is merely for economical reasons.
The A321 weighs substantially less than a B757 (89 metric tonnes vs. 112 metric tonnes), so the A321 incurs cheaper handling rates, landing fees and Eurocontrol/en-route navigation costs. The airframe is lighter too, so the A321 burns a lesser amount of fuel (bearing in mind oil has recently risen from around $250/tonne to $400/tonne).
Overall, direct operating costs for the A321 are much lower than a B757 and are not much more than an A320 (which holds 40 seats less).
The cost of ownership for the A321 will be higher than the B757, as the A321s are newer aircraft, but the A321s will require little maintenance in their earlier years – where as the B757 will now require heavier checks as they grow ever older.
The A321 in charter configuration holds nearly as many seats (220 vs. 235) as a B757. The lower operating costs on an A321 make for a lower seat rate compared to the B757.
It is true that the A321 suffers from poor payloads at certain airports i.e. Gibraltar and Egypt (due to aircraft performance), where as the B757 enjoys a good range and payload (B757 can carry more fuel and has more leg boagies, so can stop in a shorter distance on a runway). The A321 will be used on routes which are unrestrictive to operate i.e. Malaga, Alicante, Faro, Palma etc. If the A321 can offer a lower seat rate compared to the B757, it will enable the charter airline to compete more effectively in an ever increasingly competitive and decreasing charter industry.
In summary, the A321 is easier to sell per seat than the B757.
Back in 1993/4, I actually designed an airport for my GCSE design and technology project…..and it was before computers were common place in many homes, so I did it by hand. What fun it was too!!
My airport was called “Salisbury International Airport”, to be built on Salisbury Plains, as I couldn’t think of any other reasonable sized parts of the country to build on in the south of England. Bristol airport would have been closed in order to make it viable and to avoid air traffic congestion. It was to be an alternative to the congested London area and to stop people having to travel to the otherside of the country to fly to a variety of locations. I even gave it its own airport designator code of “SLS”.
The most exotic airline that I had flying there was Ecuatoriana from Quito via somewhere en route using the A310 aircraft.
Most charter airlines from the UK were to fly there and a lot of international and European carriers too.
However, if I had the chance to do it again, my choices would be as follows……..
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Three terminals.
Terminal 1 = European and domestic traffic
Terminal 2 = Charter and low cost traffic
Terminal 3 = Intercontinental traffic
Terminal One
Flybe A319/DHC Q8-400- BHD, GLA, EDI, LBA, NCL, JER, GCI, CDG, TLS, MRS, BOD, SZG, DUB, DND
BMI British Midland/Lufthansa/SAS (codeshare) – BRU, FRA, HAM, BRE, MUC, SXF, NUE, STR, ARN, GOT, OSL, CPH, BLL
British Airways/Iberia/Finnair/Aer Lingus/Swiss (codeshare) – MAD, BCN, AGP, ALC, XRY, SCQ, SVQ, BIO, VLC, HEL, DUB, ORK, SNN, NOC, GVA, ZRH, BSL, LIS, OPO, FAO, ATH, SKG, MLA, FCO, LIN, NAP, VIE, FRA, HAM, MUC, SXF, OSL, CPH, ARN, CDG, BFS, GLA, EDI, NCE, TLS, TIP, AGA, RAK, CAI, LCA, PFO, BUD, OTP, WAW, KRK, PRG, AMS, BRU, RYK, DME, SPU
Terminal Two
easyJet B737NG- BFS, GLA, EDI, NCL, LPL, NWI, MME, PRG, BUD, GVA, ZRH, MUC, SXF, AMS, CPH, LYS, PMI, IBZ, AGP, ALC, BCN, MAD, BIO, FAO, NAP, BGY, PMO, MLA, ATH, LJU
Air Polonia B734- WAW, KRK, POZ
Sky Europe B735- BUD, BTS, PRG
Wizz Air A320- KTW, BUD, RIX, VNO, TLL
Monarch Scheduled – AGP, ALC, FAO, MJV, BCN, GIB, PMI, MAH, IBZ, TFS, TFN, LPA, ACE, HER, CHQ, LCA, PFO, CFU (with a fleet of 5 based A319s)
Monarch Airlines (charter) A320/A321/B757/A330 – AGP, ALC, FAO, REU, GRO, PMI, MAH, IBZ, VCE, ATH, HER, CHQ, LCA, PFO, RHO, SKG, JSI, FNC, LXR, SSH, BJL, GOI, HKT, MLE, MBA, ACE, FUE, TFS, LPA, MIR, MLA, TLS, NCE, SZG, INN, SFB, BGI, GND, CUN, MCO/ TLV etc
Thomas Cook Airlines B757 and A330/ MyTravel B757, A321 and A330/ FlyJet B757/ Astraeus B737 – similar to Monarch destinations.
Terminal Three
American Airlines/ British Airways/ Cathay Pacific/ Qantas (codeshare) – ORD, JFK, EWR, BOS, SFO, LAX, CPT, GIG, EZE, SYD, BNE, DEL, HKG etc
Continental – IAH
Virgin Atlantic – SFO, LAX, EWR, JFK, SIN, HKG
Plus – Emirates/ Air Canada/ Aeroflot/ PIA/ Singapore Airlines/ Air New Zealand/ Delta Airlines/ JAL etc
– – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Cargo Airlines – UPS and DHL
Airport able to handle A380.
No FR or XLA :rolleyes:
The most “exotic” airlines that I have flown on are Eurocypria and Air Malta. Eurocypria being the worst ever flight I have taken (BHX-LCA-BHX A320 July 2000) due to the appalling behaviour of the Ayia Napa clubbers who made-up the majority of the passenger load and the “don’t give a @#*! attitude of the cabin crew, who were on their way back to base.
I’ve also flown British Airtours (in the days of the Landor colours and Tristars), who were actually the first airline I flew with.
You get what you pay for with a “made in Taiwan” label!!! 😀 😀 😀
Monarch fly to/from LPL daily during this summer. We have a based A320 which at the moment I think might be G-MPCD.
Hey hey – what a (kinda) coinkydinky. I saw my first moving EZY A319 last week at INV (G-EZED) and then 3 days later, Wingflaps2 and myself met up at EDI with Bmused55 and in she came to EDI too!.
Before this, I have only ever seen them stationary on the ground at LTN. I really want to fly on one of those babies!!
PS – this is Duesseldwarf – just realised that Wingflaps2 had signed himself in here!!!
Dusseldwarf and I thoroughly recommend Germanwings. They are very impressive, especially when we went with them in February 2003 from STN for £1 each way including taxes!!!
I prefer Wanderlust magazine to Conde Nast personally.
Ren Frew
Most pushbacks are included within the basic ground handling fee paid to the likes of Servisair, Groundstar et al.
Usually, if paid for seperately, they range from £50 to £200 per pushback….very expensive!
Airports only charge for pushbacks if they perform the ground handling (which is uncommon).