dark light

pesho

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 535 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VIII #2439614
    pesho
    Participant

    Sukhoi is going to start test flying the world’s first pilotless 5th generation fighter aircraft in the coming months, they have the technical know-how?

    In which case, one has to wonder why the the Russian military is purchasing Israeli UCAVs??

    The “article” is composed from few interviews and is very badly translated. What actually is said is that “in perspective it’s normal that pilotless planes will be developed”

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2030591
    pesho
    Participant

    Can some one read whats written there in Russian ?

    “Nikolay Kalistarov is presenting a model of the submarine(Severodvinsk) to Sergey Ivanov”
    Further in the article it’s said that the sub must be accepted in service in 2011 and that series of the type will become the backbone of the multipurpose submarine fleet.

    pesho
    Participant

    Airplanes flying in exercises carry an ACMI pod and a captive inert AIM-9M (Google aggressor pics and you’ll see the AIM-9). The AIM-9M automatically searches a conical area defined by +/- 15 degrees off the nose, but the seeker can also be slewed by the pilot to 30 degrees off the nose using a “coolie hat” switch on the stick (Google “Sidewinder Expanded Acquisition Mode”). When the Squadron Leader says he cannot “put weapons on it”, that would include the MWIR AIM-9M seeker.

    And none of that is mentioned to be used in the article. Can you backup your claims or this is just speculation? Also comparing Sidewinder to dedicated optical system is pointless.

    No it doesn’t. The RAF and RAAF pilots mentioned were exchange pilots with the F-15 units, and as such wouldn’t have had any optical or IR system to mess about with.

    I received the same answer before, but it’s always nice to ask, when somebody post “cannot be targeted with any weapons”.

    I haven’t seen any mention of optical(or other) systems use against the Raptor(or the performance). The problem with optical/IR systems is they work best if they’re cued by other information, as their search volumes are very limited compared to radar. There’s a lot of sky to search if you don’t know where to look.

    And the world it’s not a perfect place, so there can be long-wave radar that can give basic info where that predator in the sky is.

    in reply to: Mi-8/17s in Russian service #2441545
    pesho
    Participant

    pesho, can you share it? or I would have the FSB who wait me in a car parked in front of my house soon?

    🙂
    The plans aren’t secret. They were even posted on the russian MoD website. PM your e-mail and i will send the excel sheet.

    pesho
    Participant

    “The thing denies your ability to put a weapons system on it, even when I can see it through the canopy,” said RAAF Squadron Leader Stephen Chappell, F-15 exchange pilot in the 65th AS. “It’s the most frustrated I’ve ever been.”


    And that does not include optical tracking system right?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1815633
    pesho
    Participant

    It’s not a secret that Gazelle’s range is greater that the official figure. That was confirmed by the chief designer of the system A.Basistov.
    “The system showed huge reserves in all parameters….the missile can engage ballistic missiles more than 2.5 the range that was tested until now. It can be used against low-orbit satellites..”

    “Система показала значительные запасы по всем параметрам. Скоростные противоракеты Люльева 53Т6 могут осуществлять поражение баллистических целей на дальностях в 2,5 раза больших, чем мы сейчас их аттестовали. Система готова выполнить задачи и по поражению низковысотных спутников, и другие боевые задачи”.

    in reply to: Mi-8/17s in Russian service #2442044
    pesho
    Participant

    Russian MoD plans for 2010 with the status of inventory by 01.01.2009. I have them in excel sheet in Russian language.

    in reply to: Mi-8/17s in Russian service #2442056
    pesho
    Participant

    Airforce had by 01.01.2009 exactly 622 Mi-8’s in all variants(T, TV, MT, MTV, MB, MN, MD). The plans for 2010 is to have around 15-20% less as most units have more machined than they need. Some will go for repairs and small part will be scrapped.

    in reply to: Su-24 Fencer Questions #2443360
    pesho
    Participant

    Hope this helps. If you cannot read cyrillic i will translate it for you.
    http://airwar.ru/image/idop/bomber/su24m/su24m-2.gif

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1815905
    pesho
    Participant

    Various Russian ICBM launches.
    1) РС-20 SS-18 Satan
    2) PC-22 SS-24 Scalpel
    3) PC-12M SS-25 Sickle Topol
    4) РС-18 SS-19 Stiletto
    5) PC-12M2 SS-27 Topol-M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BCoBGdvyiQ&fmt=18

    Topol launch and view of the carrier after the launch.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OmxE-32yRM&fmt=18

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816066
    pesho
    Participant

    The S-300 system uses track via missile (with a radar seeker in the missile). It should be just as good as active radar homing.

    So you think that the seeker can operate in the meter band?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1816141
    pesho
    Participant

    Are these VHF radars as usefull againtst stealth palnes as Mr. Kopp claims? If the answer id “yes”, the end of the stealth age is coming.

    They are, but they have huge errors in range, azimuth and elevation ranges. The solution is that they can cue second radar with higher frequency in the direction of the threat or missile with either IR or good active-radar homing head.

    in reply to: Mi-28N vs Ka-52 #2485438
    pesho
    Participant

    HeliRussia 2009 : http://vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/196
    Part 2 to come.

    in reply to: The latest Mig 31 Variants should be feared. #2485462
    pesho
    Participant

    At speeds above Mach 2+, which can be reached from the tropopause upwards the turning radius is 50 km+. To make some use of its speed capability it is limited to the interceptor-role and do some hit and run. As claimed before, a MiG-31 in a high speed run is out of the “battle” already.

    So an interceptor is limited to interceptor-role. Great…..

    in reply to: The Iranian missile program #1816267
    pesho
    Participant

    You might want to check this very good article by SOC.
    http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/02/iranian-missile-silos.html

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 535 total)