Is it only the money that really bothers people about this photograph?
I suspect that it is; there are much worse photographs, and much worse art but if these are changing hands for £50, £500 or £5000 nobody bats-an-eyelid. Of course it is entirely natural to think so if £2.7million is a lot of money to you (or me) but I doubt that anybody would even be aware if the buyer had spent £2.7million on a second (or third) home or a (second or third) yacht!
With a human life worth about £5 all of us have wasted money ‘on meaningless and irrelevant crap’ haven’t we?
I would say for me it was the price that attracted me to start this thread and as to whether it is any good or not. If it had sold for something like £200 it would not have attracted any attention at all, unless somebody posted a copy of it here asking opinions.
Taste in art and photography is much like food really some like spicy and interesting others like bland and boring and many of fall in between the two.
To play devils advocate slightly we are all asuming he/she bought it as a piece of art they liked, however maybe it was purely a business type investment for somebody with loads of money who realises theres a lack of profit in yachts and houses lately, and saw art as a better bet.
I see your point that its worth whatever anybody is willing to pay for it, and I like the fact it appeals to you also as it means I am missing something in the image that you can see that really goes to show how subjective art and photography is and one persons rubbish is anothers treasure.
The other thing that interests me is having taken shots that were not that disimilar and chose to get rid of them as they did not appeal to me as images, is that somebody else may of liked them and I never thought of them as any good.
Having said that its still an awful lot of money for any shot in my opinion.
I see your point that its worth whatever anybody is willing to pay for it, and I like the fact it appeals to you also as it means I am missing something in the image that you can see that really goes to show how subjective art and photography is and one persons rubbish is anothers treasure.
The other thing that interests me is having taken shots that were not that disimilar and chose to get rid of them as they did not appeal to me as images, is that somebody else may of liked them and I never thought of them as any good.
Having said that its still an awful lot of money for any shot in my opinion.
I will update you once I have given the lense a good try as to how good I feel it is, either way I will be sticking with it unless its awful.
The scary thing is I now realise the photos I have deleted were the ones that could of made me a millionaire 😀
The scary thing is I now realise the photos I have deleted were the ones that could of made me a millionaire 😀
I was thinking the same sort of thing Robbo, I have a few pictures with dust spots that maybe worth a few quid too.
I was thinking the same sort of thing Robbo, I have a few pictures with dust spots that maybe worth a few quid too.
Hi PeeDee I have gone for the Canon 18-135 lense now and just waiting for it to be delivered i got it for £240 which is the cheapest I have seen it, For my budget It feels the best option and I really can not upgrade any further so fingers crossed it will be OK.
I use my camera a great deal so I wanted a lense thats easy to take about with me, I agree the 18-55 was a bit limited, I think I got my moneys worth out of it though. As to the tests I personally feel as long as I can achieve photos I like and others seem to appreciate then I am happy, so fingers crossed this lense will allow that to happen.
Thanks for all the advice guys.
J Boyle is right.
Was/is there a disclaimer on the spectator tickets and at the venue?
I have seen such disclaimers on tickets in the UK before and its not unheard of for the Commentators at a show to mention the risks of airshows before a show has started. I wonder if such things would cover an incident as awful as this though.
The saddest thing is that the Vultures of the lawyers will make a huge amount of money from this tragedy by using the victims as some pawns in their game. The sad thing with any risk involved sport/pastime things can go wrong and accidents can happen, Its something you accept if take part whether that be as a performer or a spectator. But in todays claim culture it just means the vultures are circling as soon as the dust dies down 🙁 .
J Boyle is right.
Was/is there a disclaimer on the spectator tickets and at the venue?
I have seen such disclaimers on tickets in the UK before and its not unheard of for the Commentators at a show to mention the risks of airshows before a show has started. I wonder if such things would cover an incident as awful as this though.
The saddest thing is that the Vultures of the lawyers will make a huge amount of money from this tragedy by using the victims as some pawns in their game. The sad thing with any risk involved sport/pastime things can go wrong and accidents can happen, Its something you accept if take part whether that be as a performer or a spectator. But in todays claim culture it just means the vultures are circling as soon as the dust dies down 🙁 .
My first sighting I remember was being in infants school the week before a Biggin Hill Airshow I think 1979 I think and the Red Arrows flew over in their Gnats followed by later on the BAC Lightning.
Then in 1982 I went to my first ever airshow at Biggin Hill and saw what really brought me into my love of aircraft and Aviation. The late great Ray Hanna displaying MH434. I was 8 years old and have never forgotten the stunning grace of his display and the sound of the merlin engine singing. From that day on I have been hooked.
My first sighting I remember was being in infants school the week before a Biggin Hill Airshow I think 1979 I think and the Red Arrows flew over in their Gnats followed by later on the BAC Lightning.
Then in 1982 I went to my first ever airshow at Biggin Hill and saw what really brought me into my love of aircraft and Aviation. The late great Ray Hanna displaying MH434. I was 8 years old and have never forgotten the stunning grace of his display and the sound of the merlin engine singing. From that day on I have been hooked.
I could never quite work him out as a person as in interviews etc he seemed rather odd, However he did amazing things for charity and ran over 200 marathons to raise money for good causes. For that alone he was a bit special.
Top that with the fact anyone of 30 or 40 something grew up with Jim ‘ll Fix It and his presenting Top of the Pops so often literally made him an icon of mine and many others childhoods.
RIP Jim a life well lived
I could never quite work him out as a person as in interviews etc he seemed rather odd, However he did amazing things for charity and ran over 200 marathons to raise money for good causes. For that alone he was a bit special.
Top that with the fact anyone of 30 or 40 something grew up with Jim ‘ll Fix It and his presenting Top of the Pops so often literally made him an icon of mine and many others childhoods.
RIP Jim a life well lived