dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2354186
    flateric
    Participant

    3 weeks if not BOHICA

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2354232
    flateric
    Participant

    and even more good news for PAK FA on the way…stay tuned
    and one surprise (no, not that one yet, sorry)

    in reply to: Italy's M-346 and Russia's Yak-130 thread #2354340
    flateric
    Participant
    in reply to: request special F-22 fotos #2355024
    flateric
    Participant

    http://s41.radikal.ru/i092/1207/c2/d62df99d24c3t.jpghttp://i070.radikal.ru/1207/de/e21db77ba266t.jpg
    http://s019.radikal.ru/i641/1207/9d/34648153f141t.jpghttp://s40.radikal.ru/i090/1207/8c/7d689ca242bbt.jpg
    http://i004.radikal.ru/1207/11/09fffcd621d8t.jpghttp://s47.radikal.ru/i118/1207/63/368255bdc8c0t.jpg
    http://s017.radikal.ru/i422/1207/c1/6c1103fcd585t.jpghttp://s45.radikal.ru/i109/1207/ec/2365b8ae774dt.jpg
    http://s40.radikal.ru/i088/1207/ee/23d6b8521352t.jpghttp://s019.radikal.ru/i641/1207/5e/979245750899t.jpg
    http://s53.radikal.ru/i142/1207/e3/d349984b758at.jpghttp://s48.radikal.ru/i122/1207/c8/75953b55ab6at.jpg

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2355226
    flateric
    Participant

    So 601 is confident to transport that air frame over such a long distance without worrying about compromised structure strength and causing metal fatigue in the transportation, for the purpose of an alleged “STRESS TEST”. And that will explain why they don’t torn it apart and ship it in pieces.

    you can safely drop #1 out of the list. literally hundreds of aircrafts were transported disassembled across the countries worldwide for stress tests without any worries. For example, T-50-0 make it’s way to Moscow Sukhoi facility from Far East inside An-124 and then on wheeled platform in several large pieces.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2355277
    flateric
    Participant

    http://s008.radikal.ru/i306/1207/eb/208ed369c7aet.jpghttp://s41.radikal.ru/i092/1207/6f/6cccb5e8c7c4t.jpg

    in reply to: Raytheon re-invents JDRADM: enter T3 #1792135
    flateric
    Participant

    https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=1835fc1a7082636955d912cab76660d6&tab=core&tabmode=list&=

    Synopsis:
    Added: Feb 08, 2011 2:05 pm
    The Air Armament Center, Advanced Programs Division, Advanced Projects Branch, Eglin AFB, FL 32542, intends to award a sole source contract to Boeing Inc. for aircraft/interface data in support of the Triple Target Terminator (T3) demonstration. This effort will provide potential T3 contractors: Boeing Defense, Space and Security Weapons; and Raytheon Missile Systems with aircraft integration expertise and data which will facilitate design, development, test, qualification, and safety certification for a flight test demonstration on the F-15C or F-15E aircraft. Information gathered by T3 contractors will be used to develop and evaluate missile configurations that could provide required system performance and satisfy compatibility with the F-15 C F-15E weapons stations.
    This effort will be conducted in three phases. For Phase I, Boeing, Inc. will conduct a feasibility study which examines options, analyzes iterative airframe configurations, performs high level impact assessments and defines and/or estimates tasks for Phase II. Under Phase II, Boeing, Inc. will perform detailed Air System impact assessments, identify risks, recommend mitigations, and develop initial planning and estimates for Phase III. Phase III will require Boeing, Inc to implement full-scale integration and certification of the T3 for launch from the F-15C or F-15E aircraft.

    in reply to: J-20 further along development than PAK-FA? #2356213
    flateric
    Participant

    Some rivets are installed or removed by hand. This is common in any aircraft manufacturing facility as automated riveters cannot reach all rivet locations.

    like on, say, that Raptor
    http://i075.radikal.ru/1207/3c/dd8d2c9e3b4ct.jpg

    in reply to: Su-47 how many bays? #2357741
    flateric
    Participant

    The bays have no trapeze launch racks or anything like that?

    they *had* to have UVKU-50/50L to carry missile mockups at least (what we see at photo). and yes – no missile launches were ever made

    in reply to: Su-47 how many bays? #2357760
    flateric
    Participant

    maybe at the next MAKS?

    http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/085/283/philosoraptor.jpg
    unlikely…K-77-1 and K-37M are all we’ll see at the nearest future

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2357901
    flateric
    Participant

    Mostly female workforce…

    because they are the most accurate … at certain areas

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2357945
    flateric
    Participant

    it’s thinner at hexagon opening area as there’s no honeycomb insert there
    I’d say it’s about an inch thick where honeycomb are

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2358227
    flateric
    Participant

    T-50 top fuselage composite panel quality check at ONPO “Tekhnologiya”

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2358467
    flateric
    Participant

    so, if J-20 was a ‘black stockings’, this will be a ‘fishnet bodystockings’?

    in reply to: J-20 further along development than PAK-FA? #2358480
    flateric
    Participant

    Funny, I heard that from a guy working on Zhukovski LII, you both aviation armchair experts never worked in the industry

    oh? did I ever state that I’m working in industry?

    , when the job and money is leaving the country you make fun from that

    it’s seems to be reaction on Boeing and Embraer work share graphics, yes?
    or you think that cancelling SSJ will bring jobs and work to Russian industry?

    and also comparing “poor” Sukhoi with Boeing large portfolio(or Embraer for instance, just check you both dumbasses who owns the company :rolleyes: ) doesnt help you much when considering they built more than 10000 commercial airplanes.

    once more – do you offer to calm down as Boeing and Embraer sales number are way higher that SSJ’s and import jets from abroad? or what?

    ‘dumbass’ is a a new way of discussion argument as I see
    feel nervous?

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 692 total)