dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2150573
    JSR
    Participant

    I think china can create export 5G fighter cheaply and fast. After all China finish 4 4G fighters (J10/JH7/J11/JF17) in 1990s budget and that time they don’t have world fastest supercomputers and largest spending on semiconductors. On top of that largest unmanned industry. They also diversified away from middleast boom boom which India is exposed.
    https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Sinopec-To-Slash-Crude-Imports-From-Saudi-Arabia-By-40.html

    in reply to: Future Franco-German MPA #2151106
    JSR
    Participant

    A320 is also assembled in China. they approaching 400 build. It is far cheaper to outsource this MPA build to Chinese.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2151221
    JSR
    Participant

    Arihant

    Have you been meeting up with JSR over the past couple of days?

    how you quietly drop the internal jammer issue in MKI that you claimed is continuously updated from Israel as if India is even capable of importing stuff so fast. I wonder what else is wrong in your statements. you simply refuse to admit that India cannot compete with China that makes you inaccurate claims.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2151261
    JSR
    Participant

    Wingtip pods are for group protection, escort duties and SEAD and Dead purposes. At least for our Su-30 MKI. Wingtip mounted pods have already been developed by Dare for such a purpose.

    It clearly say wingtip system is used on Flankers and smart skin for T-50.

    http://tass.com/defense/942027
    Gimalai EW system
    This system is derived from the Khibiny technology and is designed for the fifth-generation T-50 (PAK FA) aircraft.
    As compared to its predecessor Khibiny, which is shaped as a container mounted on a specific wingtip hardpoint, the Gimalai platform is fully integrated with the aircraft’s body and designed as individual parts of the plane’s fuselage

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2151367
    JSR
    Participant

    The MKI carries a variant of ELL-8222 spj internally since the beginning and this pod has been subjected to upgrades to keep them contemporary.

    This for Sunday Humour. If internal Jammer can solve it there will be no need for big pods outside.

    in reply to: Future Franco-German MPA #2151375
    JSR
    Participant

    I have looked at P-8 about 7000km range but no mention what flight altitude and how much fuel used. US has fracked Oil and willing to tolerate large trade deficits so the systems are reflection of it. EU has its own limitations so it simply cannot follow similar systems development and sustainment.

    in reply to: Future Franco-German MPA #2151548
    JSR
    Participant

    The best A400M. turboprop for low altitude flying and short field performance. the range of A320 will be too low and will need long runway once equipment is installed.

    in reply to: Switzerland re-lauches fighter replacement programme #2151999
    JSR
    Participant

    No it certainly does not, far from it.
    Specifically the Rafale outranges every single fighter south of a strike eagle or SU34 by a fair margin, this includes Dave A/C, SH, Typhoon, Mig35 or Viper with the CFT and externals. The gallic jet can carry an awfull lot of external fuel for its size/weight.

    MIG35 is big airframe with short takeoff capability showing tremendous real thrust of engines. it cannot be compared with weak engined Rafale that carry oversize fuel tanks that can barely cruise faster than a helicopter

    https://thedefensepost.com/2018/02/19/russia-mig-35-fighter-jet-trials-complete-mikoyan/
    Last June, Mikoyan’s public relations director Anastasia Kravchenko said: “It can take off from a very short lane, take off and land on unprepared airfields, and can be stored without a hangar for a period of a few months.”

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2152418
    JSR
    Participant

    2025-2030?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2152435
    JSR
    Participant

    Must be the 40N6M for the S-500 with near space interception , The 40N6 is already advertised for export with range quoted at 380 km and altitude 30 km

    I typically dont trust izvesta unless its an interview or direct quote but its interesting they mention 40N6 is a two stage missile , this should be a different approach from any S-300/400 family of interceptor ……the active radar part is not the first though ….again assume what they say is true or just the usual unreliable sources

    that I agree. even Nudal has 6 tests. this 40N6 would have 600 tests by now. its likely the 600km range version.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2153433
    JSR
    Participant

    What an great argument, when you think you have seen it all, you apologists come up with a new excuses. From the quality i can guess they are wearing thin. So basicly you are saying that USA, as a country is not responsible for shooting down that Iranian passenger plane, because President did not personally order its downing?

    If the equipment and the personnel who used it, were there because the governament ordered them to, there is little doubt that russia is to blame.

    As we speak, they are waging a hybrid warfare against the western world. Wake up.

    Sorry for the ot.

    First you are not speaking but writing and that with limited understanding.
    There will be tremendous improvement in business between Russia and Western EU. . without Russian energy . there wont be any Western EU factory operate in Eastern EU. so automatically factories have to shift or more robotic automation that will need Russian science. Offcourse Politicians will make noise from time to time against this loss of power but it will have no impact on outcome.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154255
    JSR
    Participant

    You are right that China copies a lot, I said they were the only ones who could afford it. Right now the US GDP is outgrowing debt, and only a small increase in defence spending of 0.5% GDP would amount to $100bn, which is spent on SDI, would go a long way.

    increasing GDP which itself debt based cannot solve problem in quality / organization of scientist and skilled labor. the deficiency in it is increasing costs and imports.
    it is high quality of science that is so ahead of time and is attracting free money to built factories without hyping it like Gigafactory. You will see the difference once the arms progress. They wont call S350/BUKM3/PantsirSM/TORM2 widely name but functionality it is the same to protect against projectiles.

    http://en.misis.ru/university/news/science/2017-04/4621/
    In Russia, the production of lithium and its compounds has been started based on a developed and cheap technology.

    http://www.liotech.ru/newsen_1206_350
    Dec 8 2011
    The world’s largest plant producing high capacity lithium-ion batteries has been launched in Novosibirsk region

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154485
    JSR
    Participant

    I would say Russian military spending is stretched to the brink right now. Only China can afford an arms race with the US.

    let see China can repeat what Russia did with 40,000 sorties in Middleast and that was mostly done with technology and equipment manufactured in 1970-80s. now the modern equipment is entering Russia. it will have big impact. I don’t think China has test fired that many long range cruise missiles.
    neither China or US can afford arms race. both are polluting environment so much that all the money will go to expensive health care. US need external human resources and components due dysfunctional education that is creating trade deficits/inflation. China need to steal or import high end stuff.. I don’t see how they can compete with Russia. Russia nuclear arsenal is modern than both. it has titanium valley and factories located in low cost regions.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154554
    JSR
    Participant

    I could excuse that if there had been any discernible and honest attempts to include China in existing and future arms control regimes, but the US attitude seemed to be “too difficult to even contemplate, and we can afford to antagonize an economically weakened Russia anyway”.

    Russia is only country that can afford high technology arms race. It hasn’t even started fracking to pollute ground water or increase debt level. It high efficient research, and economic system enable it sell more weopons cheaply.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154796
    JSR
    Participant

    this big anti air missiles can neither reliably hit ICBM nor small cruise or antiship missiles. let alone a saturated attack. they are only good for aerodynamic target.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,319 total)