dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2185353
    JSR
    Participant

    You are entirely correct. Lockheed and Boeing will be delighted if Europe doesnt get its act together.
    There’s absolutely no reason why Europe cant emulate what it did in the missile, the comercial aircraft area, the helicopter and the space business. The market is there, the resources are there (for crying out loud, even in this “almost nill defense budget” times, Western Europe spends three times more than Russia!), the industry is there. Do an “MBDA” out of Dassault and Airbus, get some realistic KKP’s, throw in 35 billion euros in R&D, wait till 2035 and serve the dam thing with white wine.
    What it cant happen is having three european xerox airframes that do the same bloody thing.

    EU does not have three times money of Russia to spend on defence. Infact both EF and Rafale lines will closed down without exports. How is that Gripen doing and that so called small awacs.
    Airbus can’t afford anything better than A320. Even that need alot imports.
    Russia at this point does not need exports to India and China to procure several thousands of its own fighters. for EU export is main thing and consider lack of military power it is coming at cost that out weigh benefit .

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2186283
    JSR
    Participant

    Did the development of Typhoon AND Rafale mean that NATO is crumbling?

    Is NATO functioning as NATO?. Volga Denpr made alot money from from NATO countries that is consequences of
    development of Rafale and Typhoon and it also contributed to failure in Libya when you look at over all force structure. more to come.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2186653
    JSR
    Participant

    What countries?

    The UK is leaving the EU.

    Welcome to the United States of Europe.

    It’s about capability both financial and technical. UK is losing both as Trump implement American first.
    Dassault simply has wider market from Egypt to India to Qatar. These countries will have money but Saudis will have far less for follow-up order for UK and even that is shared with rest of EU consortium.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2186729
    JSR
    Participant
    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2186961
    JSR
    Participant

    The Spanish economy is now growing at rates that Germany, France & Italy can only dream about.

    The kind of GDP Spain is creating is simply not conductive for industrial project like 5G fighter.

    http://www.citymetric.com/business/madrid-s-residents-are-being-forced-out-city-centre-blame-airbnb-3048

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2188255
    JSR
    Participant

    France no doubt has the technical capabilities to design and build a follow-up to Rafale all by themselves. However the question is whether they are willing to spend so much money on it.

    A “5. gen” a/c will most likely be more expensive to develop than Rafale, and Rafale was already at the limit of what France was willing to spend (at least that is the impression that I got).

    Thus it seems to me that France will need to find a partner for the next fighter development. They could do like the UK and team up with a country outside of EU; e.g. India and their AMCA.

    Germany and Spain clearly need more partners.

    Where you get idea that France can make 5G fighter by itself. Do you not see the weak engines and small size of rafale. The joint venture like CFM and various suppliers spread around the world. and those were best times for surplus Middleastern capital in France

    in reply to: US aircraft helping Philippines retake city from ISIS #2189542
    JSR
    Participant

    You mean Duterte should level the entire city with MLRS fire?

    Duterte is not capable of anything.
    Filipino labor depended on Middleast and they can teach him lesson for opening mouth too wide . I don’t even trust Chinese can help him. Maybe Vietnam.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2189694
    JSR
    Participant

    Please God no!

    It does not matter whether you join it or not. The EU common defence fund will be established . Member states will have to contribute so less money left for individual projects and procurement .

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2190610
    JSR
    Participant

    Juncker gave speech about EU defence fund and as example he mention Meteor success as it’s built by 6 or so countries. Clearly lack of understanding .

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2190665
    JSR
    Participant

    It’s a “capability upgrade” because it’s better than what they currently have.

    Capability means carrying more weopons to greater distance at greater speed and turn around time. I doubt these old airframes can generate higher sorties at higher intensity . It is assuming high quality pilots even want get train on these older planes.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2191061
    JSR
    Participant

    This is big news buried in the recent headlines over PCA, B-21, F-35. etc. Finally, the USAF is committing to capability upgrades for the F-16/-15 fleets with APG-83 and EPAWSS. The legacy fleet will be flying at least until the late 2020’s (F-15C), and into the 2030’s for some of the F-16’s and F-15E. Some was obviously funding due to BCA. On the other hand, considering the known delays in the F-35 ramp up and block buys, the service dragged their feet committing to upgrading the F-16 fleet, and backtracked several times on scope and scale of the modernization.

    How exactly is that capability upgrade. will they have CFT so that range is closer to F35 so it can work in same group without extra tankers. how about engine upgrades so it can use more common parts and same ground procedures . I doubt it will have same design cockpit and simulators as F35. These are too old airframes that will increase costs.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2192905
    JSR
    Participant

    The exact oposite is happening.
    Every single LM ppt till three years ago had a slide with a chart in wich every single European and Boeing production line went closed till 2020, that slide looks extremely silly today. Two of the lines are secure for more than a decade, and i will be astounded if they dont get till 2030, wich will dove tail with whatever will replace the Eurocanards, manned, unmanned or both and that wont be an American product, simple has that. And if someone believes that for the foresable future the Adla and the MN will seriously consider Dave A/C, better check whatever you´ve been reading…
    And for christ sake, Germany is receiving classified briefings on the F-35A from ages ago, unlike the French, till the eighties the Luftwaffe was almost entirely equiped with American hardware, quite a lot of us are old enough to remember that.
    And everyone is aware of what happens with Germany spending 2% of their GDP in defense, right? A decently bigger amount of cash than what Russia spends today…

    Germany and 2%. hehe . There won’t be Qatar or Chinese left to rescue them. EU as military power gone forever. you can see that in Turkish decsions with Germany.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2193508
    JSR
    Participant

    Kudos…. Hope you didn’t waste your entire day searching for a non-profit that gave Russia a favorable rating. Unfortunately, you are confusing ratings over information released to the public on budget information (which pretty much every developed nation does), and the real issue I was referring to- corruption, kickbacks, and accurate reporting of defense spending.

    You can disagree, but the high profile cases were even reported in Russian news, In 2011, the military prosecutor estimated that a fifth of defense spending was stolen or misappropriated.

    You’ve made absurd claims that the DoD or U.S. government is “hiding” the true cost of the F-35 by including such things as long lead items into contracts that are a matter of public record, in spite of a multitude of budget documents and reports (that are also a matter of public record). Then try to claim you can find accurate information Su-30 costs from Russia. It would help if you (and Defense-Aerospace) took even a few minutes to look at procurement practices in the DoD.

    The true cost of Su-30 or any fighter to Russian society is far far less than true cost of F-35 to US. The un stated things I let you imagine .

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2193574
    JSR
    Participant

    Tu-160M2 range will increase by 1000km and cruise will be at 18.3km height.
    https://sputniknews.com/russia/201706031054280723-russia-bomber-upgrade/

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2205932
    JSR
    Participant

    ITs not any better the GTF , LEAP,PD are of same generation but PD-14 engine its more tuned for MS-21 program , So the advantage is not a big one but even 1 % fuel efficiency matter.

    GTF has MTU parts that makes it even more problmetic and unreliable and potentially far more expensive than initially estimated. The time for over investment and free financing is likely over.
    https://m.moodys.com/research-preview/Moodys-changes-outlook-on-MTUs-Baa3-rating-to-negative-affirms–PR_348062?

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 4,319 total)