Because they are not actually obvious but rather your baseless assumptions

Yes Mig-35 carry more fuel than MIG29A, that why it has more range, no one arguing about that.
Similar top speed really nothing to talk about because at that speed it likely to be intake or placard limit rather than drag limit (which coincidentally same for F-35Aand F-35C, C version has much bigger wing, alot draggier, and heavier too.And F-35C even use the same engine. Yet despite all that, they have the same top speed).

Now on to altitude, you haven’t post any chart to show that Mig-35 can reach the same altitude as Mig-29 let alone higher altitude. Given that Mig-35 is heavier but has the same wing area of 38m2, i dont see why it should be able to fly higher.

All the change from Mig29 to Mig-35 is not that much different from change between F-18C to F-18E

MIG-35 carries more fuel than MIG-29A so it has more range. such simplistic statement. didnt I said before person of limited technical understanding.

MIG-35 does have same wing area?.. another simplistic statement. where do you think all the internal volume for fuel and external load on 5 wet stations coming from.

you don’t need manual or graphs for some thing obvious.

http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2015/8/14/3435/

It is fitted with a great targeting system, the acquisition range has been significantly increased. In addition, it is a super-maneuverable fighter … We must be proud of such aircraft. I think that not only Russian Ministry of Defense will purchase the jets, but also foreign countries,” Bondarev told at Rossiya-24 TV channel.
He noted that MiG-35 will be “much more” maneuverable than MiG-29. Moreover, the fighter will be cheaper than Su fighters and it will be easier to operate.

Great aircraft performance is its core capability.

http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2014/5/21/2331/
Great aircraft performance, state-of-the-art avionics, wide range of air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons and low operating costs make MiG-35 one of the world’s best fighters in its class. Another advantage is its commonality with the existing infrastructure created for operating MiG aircraft in Central Asia”, – the press-service added.

F-18E is late 1980s era aerodynamically deficient design that went into service in late 90s. its speed/altitude/ combat radius not much better than F-18C.

Why I have to explain the things that so obvious. It is understood that MIG35 carries 50℅ more fuel than MIG29A but it is much larger airframe and reinforced for 5 wet points with 10℅ more powerful engines and despite that it has identical top speed and much higher altitude and 50℅ more operational distance.

And that reason is international laws

Turkey ignore international law for ground invasion but it is obeying it for airstrikes. It is like talking from both sides. The reason is Russia have give them half permission. Syrians are free to shot them down.

RVV-SD looks pretty much the same as Izd.170-1 (apart some IFF stuff?). I can’t see where that alleged difference in range and speed should come from.

The avionics of the Su-27SM is pretty much copied from Su-30MK2. Plus it adds one slim central display between the two MFDs. That’s all, no magic in there.

Brahmos also look same as oniks. Club and klibr also look same. avionics is not MFD. Su-30MK2 does not have dfbw nor radar changes to deal with extra range of R77-1. That is very specific changes done.

JSOW-ER, JSM has about 560 km range
JASSM-ER has 1000 km range
MALD has 920 km range
Range wise US cruise missiles tend to have better range

Iam sure he does, those data are available in flight manual. Even me have them

Did you just took the max launch altitude and speed of KH-31 then assuming that mig-35 can do that??? what if missiles was launch from su-27?

All available in manual

Andrxx does not have any data that’s why he escaped from discussion. You have to consider weight and drag penalty of missile before range. MIG-35 is designed for higher performance than Flanker. Look at its 19km altitude and that carrying heavier AESA radar. It has higher TWR due to minimum 15℅ composite by weight. Look at MIG-29K . It can lift with heaver loads than Su-33. F-16 simply no match for loaded performance of MIG-35.

Raero range for R-77 varies a lot depending on the source, from 5 to 80kms. The upgrades performed on the AIM-120 have been more thorough than in R-77-1. In the D version the range has been increased by 50% and a 2 way data link integrated.

I do think that nowadays the biggest advantage NATO fighters have over VKS is missile performance. This year we started seeing Su-35 with R-77, when NATO Air Forces integrated this type of missile in the mid 90s.

Those are export R-77 and R-77 MD figures it has nothing to do with Ruaf missile performance. remember Brahmos to India was exported for 20 years but its range was half what Russia has for its own missile.

Su-27SM has much higher acceleration and range than baseline Su-27. this will give you idea that Ruaf does not compromise on performance even on upgrading older paltforms. this is not for export in that configuration nor on website. Su-27SM3 is over the top of it and domestic Su-35 is beyond that. there is no way a missile launch for medium performance plan like F-16 can match MIG-35 or Su-27SM. MIG has declared flight altitude of 19km for MIG-35 and that is export.

http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/company/design/
Upgrading of the Su-27SM and Su-27UB

The programme to upgrade the Su-27 aircraft, the best aircraft in its class, undertaken at the request of the Ministry of Defence, will yield an aircraft with high-spec aerodynamic performance, avionics, control systems, etc.

Still, it will be almost impossible to sell Rafale in Finland.

The cost of Rafale will be comparable to F-35, but F-35 will be much more capable; then there is also the political benefit of choosing a US brand.

political benefit of chosing US brand? The kind of cost of protection that US is going to impose on Middlestern allies that will have to initiate deep austerity and when Middleast is in austerity EU will be in even in deeper austerity. I will not be surprised if rest of EU impose EF/Rafale on Norway and rest of EU. it will become matter of survival.

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/gulf/2016/11/20/Kuwait-US-arms-deal-include-28-F-18-helicopters-worth-5-bln.html
Kuwait’s Minister of Defense Sheikh Khalid Al-Jarrah said his country’s arms deal with the United States includes only 28 F/A-18 fighter jets, worth $5 billion, local Al Rai newspaper reported him as saying on Sunday