dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2127369
    JSR
    Participant

    [quote]
    Is there a reliable source for those figures? For example, the wiki page refers amongst others to an article in Combar Aircraft by Piotr Butowski, which says “estimated”.

    Remember the F-22 was around 14.5 tons empty until it suddenly wasn’t. [/quote]
    does F-22 look smaller than F-15?.
    bigger wings, bigger tails, fatter nose etc.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2127491
    JSR
    Participant

    how accurate is this one. Germany is already under indirect sanctions.
    https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/british-taxpayer-liable-for-billions-over-qatar-fighter-deal-1.766633

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2128095
    JSR
    Participant

    Madrat

    What would the J-10 and FC-1 have to offer compared to the F-16Cs already in Turkish service?

    The design of J10 look like EF. so at least better high altitude performance and range. There could be other upgrades like AESA and IRST . China also has own satellite network so can find things for long range strike .

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128427
    JSR
    Participant

    Calculation:
    without external tanks – 3250 km (Pogosyan spoke 3,500 km)
    1 tank in the weapons bay – 3700 km
    2 external tanks – 4100 km
    4 external tanks – 4700 km
    range at the super-high speed is 2150 km (Pogosyan – 1500 km)

    two external tanks add 900km range to Su-35. there is no way it is adding less range to T-50 when takeoff distance of T-50 is 300m while SU-35 is 425m.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krSf7uHZYB8

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128791
    JSR
    Participant

    engine is just excuse for the enlarge scope to meet new requirements.
    Tu-160/Tu-22/Tu-95 engine upgrades. Tu-160 already arrived at Arctic. Su-35 at Kuril. This is complete change from short range to long range fight with bigger platforms. I gave that hint in heatwave.

    https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/04/russia-slated-lay-military-trans-arctic-fibre-cable
    Russia plans to lay trans-Arctic fiber cable linking military installations

    key word is range.

    https://www.ruaviation.com/news/2018/8/24/11818/
    New engines to boost Tu-95MS strategic bombers’ flight range
    “Currently, the Tu-95MS equipped with the NK-12MPM engine is undergoing the Russian Defense Ministry’s state trials,” Rostec said.

    http://zeenews.india.com/world/russia-developing-fifth-generation-fighter-interceptor-mig-41-2134757.html
    The MiG-41 project is currently known as the PAK DP (Prospective Aviation Complex of Long-Range Interception).

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128872
    JSR
    Participant

    What has any that got to do with making a direct comparison between the orders and production rates of the F-35 on the one hand, and with that of the T-50 on the other hand – as you did?

    Of course, mistakes were made in developing and putting into service the F-35 – as is the case with such ambitious projects – but the fact of the matter is, today there are 300 F-35s flying with half a dozen air arms or so. Can we say the same for the Su-57 in 3 years time?

    I am sure you have not estimated manpower, energy, material, transportation input impact in building 300 combat aircraft. I excluded the word money in input.
    if you don’t keep input minimum (thousands of trucks moving in and out of small place) than you get heatwave like in Germany and than what happened?

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2129034
    JSR
    Participant

    from the above. It is a transition fighter to 6th generation.

    At the end of last year in Zhukovsky began flight tests of the newest Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57 with the engine of the second stage. The Deputy Head of the Defense Ministry said that the Russian Defense Ministry expects the beginning of serial deliveries of planes with new engines with the year 2023. Alexei Krivoruchko noted that Su-57 is a promising platform for creation of new aircraft in different configurations.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2129037
    JSR
    Participant

    The can sign big contract around MAK show which is bigger aviation show. this primary land show.
    They also signed 6 MIG-35.
    http://www.uacrussia.ru/ru/press-center/news/oak-i-ministerstvo-oborony-rossii-podpisali-kontrakty-na-postavku-su-57-i-mig-35

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2129734
    JSR
    Participant

    I would find that quite OK given the size of the US economy and the overall defense spending levels. Nations around the world are buying $100 Million 4+ generation aircraft and none of them have any sort of defense spending levels as the US. Even looking at the PAKFA as an example, if and when the Russians begin to produce it at a decent rate, do you think at say $70 Million a pop, it is as affordable to them as the F-35A is to the USAF at $80 Million URF?

    why would PAKFA cost $70m?. The truck driver salary in US is 10 times now compared to Russia and all that F-35 related factories are in hot Texas or overseas transport of parts. I will let you figure out the energy cost and wear tear due to heat and all the maintaince that motors need. but Russia priority is now change to 6G fighter longe range high speed and stealthy weopons and bombers. 5G is too incremental upgrade compared to 4+++.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2129759
    JSR
    Participant

    People seem to forget just how difficult it is to re-initiate production of a jet engine, especially a beast such as the NK-32. It would be like asking GE to restart production of the J75 or RR to resume Olympus production – it would barely be possible, and even if it was it would be hideously expensive. I have read though, that the new NK-32-2s are undergoing bench tests at the moment, but I have also read that the new production of the NK-32 is turning out to be difficult because many of the components were originally in Soviet times produced in Ukraine and Azerbaijan, a political problem today.

    so how Russia produced even more advanced version of helicopter engines which in soviet times assembled in Ukraine?.
    there are more takeoffs and landing in heli engines than on long range bomber

    https://www.uecrus.com/rus/presscenter/odk_news/?ELEMENT_ID=2911
    The VK-2500 PS-03 is the latest engine modifications VK-2500 with improved performance characteristics. It uses the most modern Russian digital electronic control system and feedback control of the type FADEC. Implemented protivopompazhnaja protection, eliminating the possibility of engine failure due to powerful streams of air, reducing atmospheric pressure hot Alpine climate, strong Crosswinds during takeoff, etc.
    Now in JDC-Klimov are developing promising engine VK-2500 m. The VK-2500 turboshaft engine m is a deep technological modification of certified engine with turbovalnogo serial free turbine VK-2500. Features engine VK-2500 m will be increased power with reduced weight, modular design, ability to use on a technical condition, without undermining the full interchangeability with serial VK-2500 engines and tv 3-117, that would modernize the existing fleet of helicopters Мi and Ка and give the aircraft significantly new performance. Variability of the layout (the ability to output shaft power forwards or backwards) will extend the scope of the VK-2500 m. In addition. JDC specialists are developing new Klimov engine modifications VK-2500 PS-02 for helicopter Ka-32.

    you seem to forget Russia is not Germany. pay attention to diversified complex scientific potential. there are a lot of other examples like digitally creating IL-476 and putting the largest AESA antenna on it along with big wingtip pods. or even engines for Yak-130.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2130058
    JSR
    Participant

    The F-22 was designed to operate at higher altitudes and speeds than the F-35

    how is F-22 designed to operate at higher altitude and speed when it is not carrying more fuel than F-35 and F-22 TWR is not much better. it will need a lot of fuel in takeoff. the days of tanker of support are practically over that’s why long range hypersonic weopons are introduced for precision strike on ground.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2130388
    JSR
    Participant

    if they buy S400 and there economic system is changing . I don’t see how they can afford F35. infact F35 will get more expensive over time for Europe.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2130391
    JSR
    Participant

    @RALL

    These figures are from IRBIS E from website of the manufacture company, and do not talk nothing about export radar, only talk about IRBIS E.

    If these figures was not updated, will be because do not need any update, otherwise company would do it because it is better for them to write better perfomance.

    If you have update numbers from manufacture company, you can attached it. I would happy to see it.

    It is not a manufacture website .that will be KRET. and E mean export. it is not some retail sales that need to update figures.
    Did MIG-35 numbers got updated on website?. It has 50% more range than MIG-29S. 80% more payload with bigger cockpit and higher performance.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2130887
    JSR
    Participant

    I don’t think Turkey can afford F-35. when Turkey out of F-35. it will make F-35 expensive for others.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2130892
    JSR
    Participant

    The Irbis-E radar station with rotating phased antenna array designed by the V. Tikhomirov Research Institute of Instrumentation provides for the assured detection and acquisition of typical aerial targets at a range of up to 200 km (up to 170 km against ground background), and in a narrower field of view¬ – up to 350-400 km.

    Those website figures are for export and hasn’t been updated for a decade.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 4,319 total)