dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2165063
    JSR
    Participant

    It says retention bonuses of half a million dollar for pilots with maintaince crew over the top of it. It may become multimillion bonuses if US does not invest in bullet trains at same pace as China.

    http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/19/air-force-paying-huge-retention-bonuses-to-fighter-pilots.html

    JSR
    Participant

    Absolutely. No theory, no matter how far fetched is off the table. Nonetheless; Turkey will not be leaving NATO on its own accord. Ever.

    Turkey has already left nato if you consider the interests of countries that make up nato. Turkey is in deep relationship with Arabs/Iranians. On top of that the internal changes.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2165940
    JSR
    Participant

    I have read Syaaf has bombed Kurds. If US coalition comes to Kurd rescue it will show to Turkey and the rest only Kurd matters and if does not come than every thing is disposable. Another show down.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2166498
    JSR
    Participant

    Those slow UCAV with light payload are not effective in Syrian context. As Turkish radars can see them and notify. Syria need very small swarming UAVs in huge quantity with centralized integration of information and than hit with high speed brahmos type missiles. Tornado G will also help.
    There are deep tunnels and concrete blocks.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2166554
    JSR
    Participant

    But having these strategic assets in Iran and Syria without any A-50s is not good. Terror sponsors have an entire spectrum of assets and Russia needs to be careful…

    The radars in Su-35/Su-30SM/Su-34 are very powerfull. there is very less need for A-50 and it is not high intensity aircombat that need command and control.

    Also, its high time Russia took a review of the useless sanctions on Iran and take necessary steps for sale of aircrafts to Iran. This will also help in taking pressure off the VKS in Syria. Ppl with little common sense would understand that nations under sanctions are mostly potential buyers of Russian military hardware and it in turn reflects on Russian MICs revenue generation

    It is far more efficient that Iran gives business to Russia and Russia bombs every one else for them. Iran can only afford airdefence , electronic warfare, BM missiles upgrades at this point.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2166986
    JSR
    Participant

    Block 50 were built right up until 2003 for the USAF, block 52’s last produced around ’95. You can search the database for every f-16 serial and delivery date at F-16.net.

    As for fleet size and average age:
    http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2016/01/19/worn-war-birds/78860920/

    If USAF f-16 and F-15 are so old how is CFT installation on each airframe and capability to use all weopons/EW on each airframe. Otherwise more support aircraft needed.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2167249
    JSR
    Participant

    I bet Ukraine wishes it still had its nukes. If they did, they wouldn’t have Russian-instigated problems in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.

    very few countries in EU has budget and technical ability to maintain nukes. Why you think Ukraine importing fuel for its nuclear plants.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2167482
    JSR
    Participant

    Any reason why RuAF is not using Iraqi AB closer to Syria rather then use Iran AB and fly all the way into Syria over Iraq

    The base isn’t about Syria even though they using it for Syria. Irak does not have supply of upgraded S300 and airdefence network.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2167704
    JSR
    Participant

    here’s a question, seeing how the Iraqi’s are making good progress against ISIS, does this mean Iraq will send its forces into Syria when they’re done in Iraq?
    because the surge of Iranian and Iraqi troops, not to mention the attack helicopters and UAV’s, would likely seal the fate for ISIS and the rebels there
    combined with the Russian air campaign it would certainly be a potent air force

    they already involved when same person is moving around in two countries organizing forces.

    http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160701/1042304070/iraq-daesh-shiite-forces.html
    Elites of the Persian Gulf countries see Soleimani as a threat. Saudi TV channel “Al Arabiya” or Qatari “Al-Jazeera” talk about “the Iranian chief saboteur” showing his images where he is talking with the soldiers of Hezbollah in Syrian Latakia or leaning over military maps in the suburbs of the Iraqi Fallujah

    I think Ruaf deployment in Iran is more related to Irak/Iran than Syria.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2168501
    JSR
    Participant

    interesting, care to expand on that?

    Its not economic forum so I wont elaborate a lot but its in Russia interest to create direct show down with Saudis and preferably Saudis escalating in place like Syria and not Irak/Iran where oil production increasing.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2168504
    JSR
    Participant

    Why still limit the payload of Tu-22M to 12x250kg bombs or 6x500kg bombs since they are now flying from Iran?

    more likely training missions and lighter load give loitering time incase UAV finds new targets. but I think will start using heavier loads.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2168955
    JSR
    Participant

    There only one or two failures in about 150 missile strikes so far.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2169441
    JSR
    Participant

    might the RuAF deploy the T-50 to Syria?
    it’s quoted as being “combat ready” in this article
    http://sputniknews.com/military/20160813/1044240817/russia-defense-fighter-jet-military.html
    if deployed as air cover, it certainly would make Turkey and Israel think twice about attacking SAA/RuAF again
    or pose a major obstacle to any interventionist dreams Saudi Arabia might havewould be an excellent testing ground
    imagine if the F-35 was sent into combat before being ordered in large numbers 😀

    actually Russia will welcome Saudi intervention to drag into the mud of Syria. The airstrikes are designed in such way to create public image of wide destruction to put internal pressure on Saudis to act.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/438793/
    These developments are a strategic calamity for the United States. Instead of sidelining Wahhabi extremists and diversifying its economy, the House of Saud will now double down on fear of modernity. That means more social stagnation and more Islamic extremism. Putin wants it that way

    Turkey/Israel/Jordan are not real countries. there modern existence is due to Saudi petro dollar.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2169917
    JSR
    Participant

    the airbase expansion.
    http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160811/1044158743/russia-hmeymim-syria.html

    the supplies are still coming even with intense air attacks.

    http://tass.ru/en/politics/894238
    We need that base in order to fight those bandits in peripheral attacks,” he said. “Syria, like a magnet, attracts arms supplies absolutely from all territories. I am using “absolutely” quite intently, as I know what I am speaking about.”

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2170228
    JSR
    Participant

    I doubt F-16 can be quickly supplied as LM will put most of workers on F-35 project and F-16 is not low cost either. than there is India obsorption capacity of another fighter when they dealing with M2K and MIG-29UPG. Teja is another in the line. private sector not much skill as they need either.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 4,319 total)