dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619389
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Two major items coming out of Zhuhai from the civil aviation space. The Airbus design center in China is actually groundbreaking news that could affect the direction of the Chinese aircraft industry. An 80-plane Chinese buy of the 7E7 would mean about 40% of the 200 first year orders that Boeing is depending on is coming from China.

    http://www.forbes.com/work/feeds/ap/2004/11/01/ap1624421.html

    Airbus to Set Up Center in China Next Year
    11.01.2004, 10:36 AM

    Airbus SAS plans to set up an engineering center in China next year to focus on new generation jets for the mainland’s fast-growing aviation market, the French aircraft maker said Monday. The company also announced a deal worth hundreds of millions of dollars to sell eight aircraft to a Chinese airline.

    Toulouse, France-based Airbus said its engineering center is expected to employ 200 people by the end of 2008, the company said in a statement at an air show in the southern coastal city of Zhuhai.
    . . .

    http://news.airwise.com/stories/2004/11/1099290754.html

    Boeing Looks To China For 80 7E7 Orders

    Boeing hopes that Chinese airlines will soon place orders for up to 80 of its new 7E7 “Dreamliner” jets, according to the official publication of Airshow China 2004.

    An order of this size would push Boeing over its target of 200 sales for the more fuel-efficient airliner by year-end, the publication said, without citing a source.
    . . .

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619395
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/latestnewsstory.cfm?storyID=3606204&thesection=news&thesubsection=world

    A Reuters report:

    New Chinese missile featured at air show

    02.11.2004 1.30 am

    A new short-range missile built by China and capable of striking Taiwan was featured at this year’s Zhuhai airshow yesterday.

    The B611 surface-to-surface missile has a range of between 80 km and 150 km, promotional material given out at the Zhuhai airshow said.

    Actually, 150 km isn’t really useful against Taiwan.

    in reply to: China might get Ukrainian Slava class cruiser #2067745
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    No, GD, you are wrong here. The 052Bs are a rush job. When the HHQ-9 VLS development was delayed, the urgent need for new surface ships meant that hasty new plans drawn and original were modified to carry SA-N-12 and the 052Bs were born.

    By the time the second pair started construction, HHQ-9 VLS trial was finally completed, and 170/171 are completed as to original plans.
    If the delay was not there, all four ships would of been in the same class.

    I’ve followed the 052s since they came out. The two classes came out of the blue. No intelligence that either class existed when the 168-171 came out in photos.

    There is nothing that said the original plans had 168 and 169 as PAR carriers. There is nothing that indicates that one class was a rush job over the other or all four were laid out to be the same.

    All we know of the two classes are from pictures. The hulls are not exactly alike and the 052Cs has larger tonnage. If the original plan for all four is the 052C’s then the superstructure of the 052B would be the same. There is no way to install a 360 coverage PAR on the 052Bs as they are now.

    China hasn’t built any more than two DDGs of the same variant since the Ludas. They build in small increments. The 052Bs are obviously optimized for anti-surface.

    But if you do have literature that said the 052Bs should have PAR then it would major news indeed. Post it here. I would be extremely interested in looking at it. Thanks.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619527
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Huh?

    JJ/LT-6B, JJ/LT-10A???? :confused:

    Any idea what role?

    Looks like light air-launched AShMs for either smaller fixed-wings or helos. Maybe built for the ship-based helos like the Z-9 .

    in reply to: China might get Ukrainian Slava class cruiser #2067765
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The only reason for China to buy the Ukrayina would be the same reason why it bought the Minsk. And that would be for a theme park.(1)

    The 052B were lay down as anti-surface warfare ship with 16 AShMs while the 052C is an area defense ship with a PAR but with only 8 AShMs. These are classes that occupy two different roles but sharing a common tonnage and similar hulls. There is only so much space to optimize for either role.

    So nothing could more silly than extrapolating that because a surface warfare vessel (052B) is using a medium-range SAM (SA-N-12) then the long-range SAM system of area defense ship (052C) must not be working.

    Different missions, different vessels, different SAM classes.

    —————————————————————-

    Notes:
    (1) Read about Minsk World here: http://www.shenzhenwindow.net/Travel/minsk.html

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619588
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    These pictures show the L-15 with an extremely long, pointy and slightly drooping nose.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619590
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    According to Qianlong, the L-15 is officially referred to at Zhuhai at the “Flying Lion.” That’s second flying cat nickname given by the official Chinese aviation export arm CATIC. The FBC-1 is called the “Flying Leopard.”

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619627
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Any idea where those “high performance turbofans” with 4200 kp each will come from?

    What trainer has “high performance” turbofans? Don’t be ridiculous.

    Turbofans for the L-15 will be the WS-11 if it intends to be sold inside China or the Ukrainian AI-25TLK.

    Basically two engines of the same heft as the Garrett.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619682
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The LFC-16 is actually very interesting. The original name for the LFC-16 was CY-1 and was developed by a new private company from Beijing called SuperWings.

    The fact that it now has a AVIC logo and designation means that there are actual interest, or at least consideration, in pursuing this concept by the national industry.

    The idea behind the CY-1 was that new control and lift devices, including the full length side lift surfaces above the wings, would confer extreme manueverability to a stable design. Therefore, you can have a supermaneuverable plane without the need for fly-by-wire.

    Pictures of the CY-1 from the last air show.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619692
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Model of a new CATIC transport being unpacked at Zhuhai! We’ll find out its designation later in the show. China hasn’t revealed any turbofan/jet transport project before so this would be entirely new.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619697
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Those are H6D or H6H with two wing pylons.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2619708
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Rear off the Yak-130 is certainly different

    The front looks very different too. It’s like saying it looks like the Yak-130 because it has wings, lerx and two seats. Ridiculous.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620155
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The Zhuhai Airshow Primer

    Okay aviation fans, the 5th Zhuhai airshow will begin in two days. Nov. 1. It is the one airshow in China showcasing Chinese aviation products, though once again this year, there seems to be more “models” than actual airframes from the two AVICs.

    So while the airshow lasts (Nov. 1 to Nov. 7) look for news on the following new projects:

    1) FC-1: fighter, Chengdu, Sino-Pakistani project (and well-known flame topic on AFM); big disappointment that one of the flying prototypes won’t show up.

    2) FTC2000: supersonic AJT. Guizhou, another airshow disappointment; was a full scale mockup at the last show; there are two flying prototypes but neither one is slated for the show.

    3) H425: medium helo, a uprated development of the Z-9 (Dauphin) from Harbin (also known as Hafei); first flew earlier this year, hopefully it can make an appearance.

    4) J-7G: fighter, Chengdu, latest version of the J-7MG; the MG made its initial appearance at Zhuhai; doubtful they’ll one along to the show,

    5) J-10: fighter, Chengdu. because of explicit naming of the J-10 by PAF officials, it was hoped that it will be revealed at the airshow this year; highly unlikely

    6) JH-7A: strike-fighter, Xian; the export version of the FBC-1M was showned as a model in earlier shows; it was hoped that we would get to see the JH-7A as we saw the FBC-1 (which actually took to the air two shows ago); highly unlikely, but one could hope

    7) L-15: supersonic AJT, Hongdu; its mockup is probably the highlight of this year’s show

    8) MA60: turboprop transport, Xian’s 60 passenger feeder liner developed from the Y-7 (AN-24); there are new variants including a frieght version. Plane number B-2429 was shown at previous shows including Singapore so it might show up again at Zhuhai,

    9) Y12E: turboprop transport and utility, latest version of Harbin’s popular 19-passenger craft; the Y12E was recently certified.

    10) Y8F400: turboprop transport, Shaanxi, the Y8F800 prototype with the solid nosecomb has not appeared at any airshow yet but has pictured many times in publicity livery. Hopefully it would show up and people can take some closeups. Otherwise, they might send the Y8F200 B-5791 which had appeared in previous shows.

    Others that we will hear about and possibly appear in models, videos or posters at the show are helos Z-9 and variants, Z-8 and variants, and the light HC120; the J-8 in its latest F and H variants; trainer K-8 in its latest guise (supposedly updated with a glass cockpit); and commercial transports ARJ-21 and the ERJ-145 project with Embraer of which the first two recently rolled off their asembly lines this summer.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620290
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Not all aircraft. The F-16D for example (or B) didn’t have an avionics spine until the Israeli air force asked for one. The Lavi didn’t have a spine either.

    I’ll grant you that one, Erez 😀 Not all. But most two seat conversions and especially when the second seat is set higher than the first has extra structure for the fairing and spine is often used to bridge the tail and the back of the canopy. When you have extra space that is required by the second seat anyways, you use it.

    Spines are not anything special. The two-seat MiG-21s have spines whether JJ7s or Mongols because the design dictates them.

    And GD, I was thinking of root beer 😉

    Well that’s good 🙂

    Can’t have you hungover in calculus class in the morning.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620333
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    no need to get personal GD. 😉

    I was only having fun with him. He is under 21 and drinking would probably be illegal for him 🙂

    looks like the spine is too big to be only for weight support, and i doubt the engineers at CAC will waste that space or try to fill it with a few liters more feul. so i guess erez was right after all.

    You put in a spine for a higher seat not for “weight support” but to keep the aerodynamics in line with the design. This is the same for practically every two-seater. You can only get around this only if you can put in a second seat without any change in the overall planform of the original one-seater. (BTW, putting in a higher second seat not only necessitates a spine for the fairing but usually a higher taller tail too. It’s all aerodynamics.)

    Now with the extra structure put in, of course you’re not going to waste it so it would be for either avionics or fuel. We have no idea as of right now whether the J-10B’s spine is full of fuel, avionics or an empty compartment for luggage. Of course, any aviation designer would make use of empty space.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 2,918 total)