dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620372
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Cheers! 😉

    For pointing a structure that both Arthur and I had said is common to all two-seat conversions?

    Everything from the A-4 to the EF2000 has spine because you need it to fair in the second seat which is most often set higher than the first. It’s like me getting bought drinks for pointing out that the J-10B has wheels.

    Besides, buying you beer is contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620379
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The new H6X with 4 underwing pylons for AShMs. The type is reported in Chinese-language forums as entering production.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2621323
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    A news photo of Chinese brass not looking at a model of the J-10 which does not officially exist 😀

    in reply to: Military Zeppelin #2621326
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    A F-22?! You don’t need no $258m F-22. A Navy blimp was once brought down by a diesel submarine.

    When the K-74 came down, it was reported that it went:

    “SSSSSSSPPPPPPPPPPPPLLLLLLGGGGGGGGGSSSSPPPPT”

    in reply to: Ol munition found in Delaware (USA) with mustard gas #2055151
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    If you breath in the stuff, there goes your lungs.

    Bad yellow mustard made with heavy horse radish has the same effect. I once put too much of that stuff on a hot dog and it damn near killed me.

    in reply to: Inside one of the many pathetic rusty bucket??? #2068298
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    There are derogatory words for people from most nations (e.g. we can call the french frogs, the americans yanks, the dutch cheeseheads, the brits limeys etc etc) but whether or not the use of such a word is “all right” or “funny” depends on who says it to whom, in what context and with what intent.

    Yanks is not a derogatory word and Americans call themselves that. There really isn’t a slur for people from an all-conquering superpower.

    Now, what really surprises me about this thread is that Sev and you were actually able to decipher enough of Edisonone’s “english” to realize two dozen replies.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2621761
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Zhuhai Airshow is practically a “model show” with no real Chinese-made military aircraft on display. The latest news suggested that FT-2000 will not attend the show. The airshow is becoming one of the biggest jokes in 2004.

    Yes, it is starting to sound like it would suck especially after such high hopes. They are blaming high insurance rates.

    But the refusal to send even the FTC-2000 is a surprise. About the only new thing of interest is the L-15 mockup. Hopefully, they’ll send the larger long-range planes like the MA60 and Y8F200 that they’ve sent before.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2621776
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Can’t verify something that isn’t official. It’s all conjecture and common sense.

    in reply to: US could shoot down EU satellites #2621780
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Gallileo is part of China’s commercial push that it hopes would linked China across Eurasia to Europe. They want a system that can allow a truck in Dalian, China, to travel all the way to Calais. That is what Gallileo is for not as a guidance device for a cruise missile.

    Why would China trust countries that are nominally part of NATO to pinpoint its weapons anyways? The Beidou system is China’s military GPS, not Gallileo.

    The US sees war in everything while China sees trade.

    http://www.spacedaily.com/2004/041026103647.ahbwkm8v.html

    SPACE WIRE
    China slams as ‘absurd’ idea that EU satellite cooperation is military

    BEIJING (AFP) Oct 26, 2004
    China Tuesday slammed as “absurd” the idea that its satellite cooperation with Europe could have military uses, after reports the United States might shoot down the satellites in wartime.

    “As for reports that this plan will be devoted to military use, I think this kind of accusation is quite absurd and ridiculous,” foreign ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue told a regular briefing.

    . . .

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2622136
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The JSC V. Chernyshev Machine-Building Enterprise makes the RD-33 and RD-93 in Moscow.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2622143
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Hmmm, according to a HK and Canadian-Chinese (Kanwa?) report, Russia has issued a statement that problems with Russia selling the RD-93 for the FC-1 is groundless.

    The RD-93 is currently used for the FC-1’s prototypes but once the testing is done, Russia will “defer” to China on the “basic” RD-33 and that there would be no problem with buying the engine even if the engine goes to Pakistan.

    It seems that Russia is trying to reassure China AND Pakistan that a Russian engine could be trusted on the FC-1.

    Why would Russia do this? Possibly because the FC-1 is no small order – especially with the numbers that CAC is predicting. If China and Pakistan decides that the FC-1 would be better off with another engine, then there could a loss of up to 1,000 engines (the FC-1’s designer gave that number which indicates an expectation of a PLAAF buy.)

    Babelfished:

    Chinese and: Russia provides the engine to FC1 the plan to appear the troublesome view to be absolutely groundless 2004-10-25 22:47:30 clicks: 611 is even may the husband: The Chinese and is authorized the Russian Chernyshev enterprise publishes stated the west reported declared Russia provides the engine to FC1 the plan to appear the troublesome view to be absolutely groundless Hong Kong is distributing the Chinese and English version Canada Chinese and the defense commentary monthly publication is authorized the Russian Chernyshev enterprise publishes the statement to express the west has the news to report declared Russia provided the engine to the center domestic product FC1 fighter aircraft the plan to appear the troublesome view is absolutely groundless.

    Reported FC1/JF17 in view of the western media because the engine question possibly appears the new trouble the report, Chernyshev enterprise market department Director Alexander Korostylev tells the Chinese and reporter said provides RD93 to China to belong to RD33 to be basic, at present mainly uses in the test flight.

    The Chinese and the report declares once the test flight to complete, after FC1 is at the volume production condition, the Chernyshev enterprise will be able to defer to Chinese, Pakistan’s request provides this kind of model the engine. The Chinese and the aviation edits Yuri. Baskov to think China will obtain basic RD33 not to be able to have more barriers. The Indian navy is planning in the purchase the MiG29K use RD33 Series 3M which is the process improves. In further improves the RD33MK thrust augmentation thrust force to have present 8300kgf to increase 9000kgf.

    Pakistan was hoping this kind of fighter aircraft, simultaneously the Chengdu airplane company also hoped this kind of fighter aircraft is accepted by the Chinese air force. The Chinese and the whole world one’s own disclosed the 4th test flight FC1 fighter aircraft will install the domestically produced KLJ10 fire control radar.

    in reply to: Belgian F16s will put Swedish Gripens to test #2622145
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    That would be an interesting matchup, indeed.

    in reply to: Third DC-10 for the RNLAF delivered #2622148
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    A third KDC-10!?! I find it hard to believe that Arthur’s lawn darts can’t fly from one end of Holland to the other without inflight-refueling.

    in reply to: The timeless MiG-Shenyang machine … #2622312
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    That should be Chengdu, not Shenyang. Nice pic btw.

    One JJ7 from Guizhou, too.

    in reply to: US could shoot down EU satellites #2622316
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Second if my enemy is using my allie his communication devices and my allie is knowingly letting them,then he is my enemy also (so far for military logic), and i agree with this completely.

    The first problem is that the US is looking for an enemy. This is a report calling China an enemy and then threatening an ally for abetting an “enemy.”

    Now, if the US has declared China an outright enemy then perhaps the Gallileo partnership would have never happened.

    Secondly, China could only be an US enemy if the US takes war into China’s backyard. China, as you noted, has no military reach. If there is war between China and the US it is because the US is choosing to fight in Asia.

    So it basically comes down to the US declaring enemies and making its European friends treat people who has no problem with Europe as enemies as well. China focus is on its economy and the fact is there is not other country in the world that can consume as much aircraft and satellite products as China in the coming decades.

    If the US stops trying to find excuses to use its $466-billion-dollar military, no one will talking about shooting anyone else’s satellites.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 2,918 total)