dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAC Gearing up for K-8 and JF-17 Production #2655690
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    I’d add Ukraine-Antonov is based there so they have a good technological and knowledge base.

    Yah, I’m still stuck in the Cold War. Also, the Czechoslovakia I listed up top is no longer an political entity πŸ˜€

    The Czech Republic. Unless Solovakia has some of Vodochody’s plants and design offices.

    Also, I wouldn’t exactly count South Korea or Taiwan just yet-significant US assistance was needed to make the F-CK-1 and T/A-50. Not that they couldn’t do it, Taiwan has made the AT-1 after all and Korea has a good knowledge base from assembling F-16s and making the T/A-50, but based on current products I wouldn’t call them 100% ready.

    Like I said, new entry for Korea and Taiwan as possibly an one-shot deal, though the ROCAF are looking at a possible new homemade trainer.

    Both S Korea and Taiwan could undoubtedly produce planes if it weren’t for politics.

    The same for Holland which I left out due to the sad demise of Fokker πŸ™

    But I probably should have list the Dutch on the same scale as Australia and Canada which has US offsets.

    Not too sure about Israel either-can they build one on their own without external financing or assistance? The other countries can.

    Well, it’s been debated whether the state of Israel could survive without US support across the board from financial to political.

    But it is certain that the Israeli industrial complex could produce planes to a degree matching anyone except the true independents like the US, Russia, Britain, France and China.

    The P5 are really the only one that could produce everything along the entire production and operational chain from engines to frame to weapons (whether China’s are copies or not, a J-8II could be spat out from an assembly line without any input whatsoever from the rest of the world.)

    Sweden is probably the closest to an independent outside the P5. It still use American engines and missiles though.

    South Africa and Israel probably rank closely after the Swedes with their Cheetahs and Kfirs.

    in reply to: PLAAF Attrition #2655707
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    12/16/03 is the reported date for the J-10B’s first flight (though I’ve seen Dec. 19 also)

    It was actually corroborated by hints in the official press both before (the October, 2003 article on FC-1’s chief manager who was also the lead on a “two seat” that will testflighted before the nd of the year) and after that date.

    The JH-7 crews do indeed do low level flying. The JH-7 was designed as a terrain following strikecraft. The terrain following radar is part of the “Blue Sky” pod developed specifically for it.

    Unless the PLANAF was testing “Blue Sky” with the MKK. Nearly an impossibility without a long period of systems integration.

    in reply to: PLAAF Attrition #2655761
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I would tend to believe it. The boards are often a bit shaky but when you have dates, they tend to turn out correct (especially like FC-1 “pre official” flight dates, J-10B flight, etc.). People making up bullcrappy usually don’t have enough confidence in their crap to actually use dates that could be correlated.

    Wuhan is a major city with lots of people having access to the internet (though posting it here would probably invite a crackdown later.)

    Whether or not that those were MKKs or some other aircraft is probably more in doubt. That a crash actually happened is probably on target.

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2077034
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by jkw
    Building an ageas class destroyer, and building frigates that are over 3,000 tons have really nothing to do with building an air craft carrier. (A little sarcasm here)

    That’s funny. I said all the Chinese carrier stories come from Western conjecture, not the Chinese themselves and the first thing you do is post a Western article and then conjectures about a carrier escort group.

    It’s not “sarcasm” when you’re proving the other person’s point, silly.

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2077036
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by google

    How did this thread get rated as a 1 star?

    LOL. Don’t tell you didn’t notice that every Chinese related thread gets a one star in this place, at least in the beginning. Even the picture threads. My SH-5 pict thread got a one star within minutes after I posted πŸ˜€

    in reply to: PAC Gearing up for K-8 and JF-17 Production #2655778
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    There are only about two dozen countries in the world (out of 160) that could build military jets of any sort in a significant way:

    EUROPE
    Russia
    France
    Britain
    Sweden
    Italy

    Germany (as partner)
    Spain (as partner)

    Czechoslavakia
    Serbia
    Romania
    Poland

    N. AMERICA
    US
    Canada (American offsets – since the CF-105 anyways)

    ASIA:
    China
    Taiwan (increasing looking like the F-CK-1 is a one-shot affair – since much of the engineers and design team have been dispersed – many ending up in Korea)
    Japan
    Korea (new entry with the T-50)
    Israel
    India
    Pakistan (currently PRC offsets)

    SOUTH AMERICA
    Brazil (EU – Italian – partner)

    AFRICA
    South Africa

    OCEANIA:
    Australia (American offsets)

    So being part of the list is not anything to sneeze at, however late.

    And Pakistan would leapfrog many of the smaller players on that list once the Kamra built JF-17s and K-8s are sold overseas.

    in reply to: South- Americian Airforces. #2656132
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Camaro, amazing picture sequence on the Mi-8/Blowpipe hit. Sad that you see it frantically firing off flares before the final hit. No survivors, I guess, since it’s impossible to bail out.

    Was this part of the Equadorian border war or a COIN operation against the Shining Path?

    in reply to: Is the Great Britain a thing of the past? #2656147
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by par Benelos

    and for a personage you maybe know as William the Conqueror, his name here is Guillaume le ConquΓ©rant πŸ™‚

    He was better known to his comtemporaries as William the B@st@rd – before conquering the Bigger Bretagne.

    in reply to: South- Americian Airforces. #2656624
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Nice pictures, Camaro, Carrizzo.

    Say, do you or anyone have pictures or information from the Peru-Ecuador border airwar of arund 1996 (I think)?

    It was Mirages and Kfirs against Sukhois (I don’t think Peru had Mig-29s at that point).

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2077100
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    If you look at the Chinese carrier rumours carefully, nearly all of it comes from Western conjecture.

    There really isn’t anything from the Chinese side except for buying up old Russian carriers and turning them into theme parks.

    in reply to: General Discussion #379687
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vortex

    Now GD, aren’t you and holeinone both “We are faminLee”? Why you have to make fun of him when replying to me?

    It’s “FamiLi.”

    Lee is Anglo-Saxon such as General Robert E. Lee πŸ˜€

    I didn’t reply to you. I replied to Plawolf and I was just asserting that you’re not a racist but simply nerdy and inarticulate and your statements were taken the wrong way.

    How could you be a racist since you’re also yellow :p

    And yes there were riots happening in Taiwan for three days after the elections and yes, “naive” yellow people like you had talked about this before.

    PLAwolf and others simply missed the sarcasm in your posts.

    in reply to: Another BREAKING NEWS: Taiwanese President SHOT! #1965191
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vortex

    Now GD, aren’t you and holeinone both “We are faminLee”? Why you have to make fun of him when replying to me?

    It’s “FamiLi.”

    Lee is Anglo-Saxon such as General Robert E. Lee πŸ˜€

    I didn’t reply to you. I replied to Plawolf and I was just asserting that you’re not a racist but simply nerdy and inarticulate and your statements were taken the wrong way.

    How could you be a racist since you’re also yellow :p

    And yes there were riots happening in Taiwan for three days after the elections and yes, “naive” yellow people like you had talked about this before.

    PLAwolf and others simply missed the sarcasm in your posts.

    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    It could “explode” if its cooling system is badly regulated. The core could melt through the ship. Everything about nuclear reactors concerns the ability to contain the atomic chain reaction by taking away excess heat.

    Peter the Great could be a 19,000 ton floating Chernobyl.

    A great story recently on the Chernobyl disaster on American television (it was a show on 3 Mile Island). Over 6000 people basically gave up their lives on the cleanup and building the containment structure around the melted core at Chernobyl.

    in reply to: Out of production aircraft #2656721
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Originally posted by PhantomII
    No one had comments about my rather interesting Q-5 proposal??

    I thought it was at least somewhat creative.

    The TVC was creative, alright. The way the engine fittings are right now basically precludes that unless you redesigned the entire rear fuselage.

    Note that the exhausts of the two engines buried deep inside the rear framework with a divider between them. A TVC nozzle can’t work unless the engines juts far out.

    There have been a few documents on the Q-5’s history and it’s basically an aircraft that was kept alive by a few dedicated engineers who shepherded the type through the turmoil of the Cultural Revolution.

    It was was a melancholy but in the end a rather triumphant story. A small victory of the human spirit.

    But since its lead engineer – Yong was his name I believe – died, the future of the type has probably ended.

    Though there reports on Chinese boards of sightings of new Q-5s parked at NAMC πŸ˜€

    in reply to: J-7 and MiG-21 families #2657560
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    A reason to post picts of the J-7D

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 2,918 total)