Just found the first review and to admit … I’m simply speechless ! 😮
THANKS to SOC via the Secret Projects Forum: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,16508.msg197054.html#msg197054
Deino
Chinese aviation watchers have really been blessed by both you and SOC.
How often is it that while asking a question about a subject that you can actually get an answer from someone who wrote the book on it?
Posters in this thread should count themselves lucky.
The question is can they achieve some parity with those air forces they might face in the future? Those forces include the Japanese Self Defense forces, the air forces of Vietnam and those of India. China is in a tough place.
If it were just Vietnam and India then China would be in a rather sweet spot. China is in a tough place because of the US and her allies, Japan, Australia and every other developed nation in the region.
The chances of war with India or anywhere in the subcontinent is practically non-existent simply because the forces facing China to its East are so overwhelming.
No one worries about the barn animal in the backyard when the lions, tigers and wolves are patrolling the front lawn. The Chinese are not stupid people.
Hotdog does to provoke people and to engage in a form of trolling. It’s idiotic at best and insidious damaging to the forum at worst.
And no, he doesn’t consult with people when he puts on their names on threads. He placed my name in a thread that he knows I would never create.
not a question of comparable helicopters, its a question of ability to export.
obviously Dhruv is a big boy like the J-10 of helicopters, and Z-11 is the Tejas of helicopters.
How can you be a “big boy” in exports when your orders put together are smaller than the Z-11’s 40 to Argentina?
It is known fact that Chinese have invested heavly in Africa and Chinese simply dont have any military to protect it despite world second largest budget. Neither Japan or Russia has wasted this scale of money.
What nation would limit foreign investment based on its military ability to “protect” it? What century is it?
Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and practically every nation in Europe have far more investment than they are able to protect militarily.
This is one of most stupid observations I have heard here yet.
It’s obviously a big deal to Russians who insist on a Chinese thread to talk about Russian technology as being on par with the West.
You never see Chinese posters on Russian threads. This is pretty much an one-sided affair where Russians need to make themselves feel better.
Again, it’s a matter of time. There is a reason why the US DOD designated China as it’s chief competitor despite the fact that China is obviously still a third world nation in many ways.
Much of that has to do with the fact that it is already the second largest economy in the world even before it actually reaches a developed state. Imagine when it actually does reach that point.
How’s that ARJ (in your sig) doing these days?
Sure is leaving Russia in the dust. 😀
It’s doing well enough. There are 309 orders for the aircraft already. Its stablemate, the larger C-919 has 175 orders and another 60 options.
As I said, it’s a matter of time.
It is a matter of economics.
Once the Chinese engine for the FC-1 is in place, there just might be an 1 for 1 replacement of the J-7s.
Then again, they could go with a heavy/medium air force of J-11s and J-10s which seems more likely likely at the moment because the WS-10A looks far more along than the WS-13.
Sometimes procurement policies are influenced by what is available at the time.
If its performance characteristics and technical sophistication match its Russian counterpart, yes. If not, then no – just because it carries a label which reads WS-15 that doesn’t mean it’s a world-class engine 😉
And even then, there are plenty of other fields where China has some way to go to match Russian/Western standards, for example nuclear submarines.
Russian and Western are nowhere near equivalent. The industrial complexes of developed East Asia (Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) are far closer to the West in quality than Russian ones. We can see this in the fields of large scale infrastructure and electronics. And China is definitely East Asian.
WS-15 and WS-10A if and when they are successful it would be because of a western base. Like the economy, it’s really a matter of time before Russia is caught up and left behind. You can see that in Chinese infrastructure and the heavy industrial products like cranes, HSR locomotives and commercial ships. But it will take awhile before it can catch up with the West.
The Argentina deal for the Z-11 involves 40 aircraft.
I doubt that total sales of the Dhruv are anywhere near that amount.
Which is what makes these “questions” from Japan and the US hypocritical and laughable to basically every third world nation in the world.
No one outside of the whites and their allies like the Japanese can possibly believe that it is okay for one party to have 11 carriers and it is not okay for the second party to have even one.
And to top it off, Japan and the West already had a history of invading Chinese territory and killing Chinese civilians.
It is like Germany lecturing Israel to decrease the size and capability of its military. Stupid, racist and insensitive to the extreme.
and
If the mere presence of a robust PLAN carrier battle group is enough to persuade some not to miscalculate and interfere with china’s commercial shipping in time of a crisis, or even dissuade a crisis from happening in first place, then the carrier has served its purpose.
ultimately these weapons are basically built to prevent wars.
This is exactly the rationale that the US uses now and that the UK used in the past. There is no reason why this same policy is not suitable for China in the long run.
Don’t reply to racists like Musashi or Teer since their whole schtick is to turn this into a political insult fest to insinuate that it is okay for whites to have 11 carriers but China can’t have one without being considered a threat.
Especially ignore Teer, since as an Indian he has no understanding of the West or the Japanese position and yet pretends like he does just so he can get his digs in on the Chinese.
Their world is where it is okay for the Holocaust to be remembered but for 30 million Chinese murdered by the Japanese can’t be remembered and that China must remain weak so that the Japanese and the Western nations who have invaded and killed Chinese people in the past can have the same option in the future.
They can go stew in their racist juices.
Stick to news and pictures.
It is going down in flames because Musashi decided to make it a political issue.
Why does any country have a carrier?
Why should we even care in a thread in this particular forum which is supposed to be focused on equipment?
No one would bring up politics if it were about a new carrier from a white nation like the US or UK. The hypocrisy and racism practically begs for the harsh answers the Chinese members gave.
Shut up about politics and just concentrate on news and picture of the hardware and we’ll be fine.
BTW, nothing could be a bigger hypocrisy and hyperbole than questioning the Chinese carrier which is — as said by China and everyone else with any knowledge of naval affairs — that it is no more than a training instrument and would not change the equation in the Western Pacific which is stacked from top to bottom with American and Japanese firepower. With US submarines, warships and aircraft patrolling far closer to China’s coast than Cuba. And the US threatened to go nuclear when the Soviets decided to station in Cuba.
Hypocrisy goes hand in hand with an ugly racism. “We can harass you in front of your doorstep but don’t try to defend yourself because it’ll change the balance of power.”
The reply from the average Chinese person should be “Go f–k yourself.”