dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2160546
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The Program basically gave the tall finger to Gilmore’s assessment (from latest DOT&E report) of what was possible.

    Completing the full set of Block 3F WDA events by May 2017, the planned end of Block 3F flight test according to the most recent program schedule, will require an accomplishment rate of over 3 events per month, more than 3 times the rate observed in completing the 12 Block 2B WDA events (approximately 0.8 events per month). Extending by two months to the end of July 2017, as has recently been briefed by the Program Office as the end of SDD flight test, is still unrealistic. Unless the accomplishment rate increases over the rate during the Block 2B testing period, completing all Block 3F WDA events will not occur until November 2021.

    Thanks to Dragon029 for bringing it up.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2161486
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Note that the items that are not “common” are structural..You won’t be “sharing” them anyways and you will likely only build them once (id during production).

    Where commonality really drives down cost is in the area of LRUs. In this area the F-35 has a large% of 100% Common items. Think engines, avionics, sensors, actuators, tires, etc.

    Then there is the “commonality” of future development, weapons qualification, etc.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2161520
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    With the advent of CNC machining… “Common” and “Cousin” are virtually the same.

    So that’s:
    F-35A = 80.2% C&C
    F-35B = 67.4% C&C
    F-35C = 56.9% C&C

    Considering that the F-35A makes up the VAST majority of the buys, it’s 80.2% C&C helps a lot followed by the F-35B’s 67.4 C&C helps too.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2161569
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Metric?!!

    The difference is 5500lbs or 2495kg

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2161648
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They did.

    The F-35A & C share most of the same structure (it’s the same titanium)
    The F-35A & B share the same wing (but uses aluminium bulkheads)
    They all share virtually the same engine
    They all share the same avionics suite (even the same software load)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]247714[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2161904
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    No idea what plane this is but I found it on instagram

    Learn to do a Google Image search…… You will be well rewarded 🙂

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2165105
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It’s already been reported that F-35s are wearing out the wire faster than usual due to hitting the same wire.. over and over again.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2165109
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The USMC has always had the plan (since before 2000) to go IOC with a version that was not the final one. This was due to the sorry condition of the Harrier force and to a lesser degree the Classic Hornets.

    Once the F-35 program started in 2001, they settled on Block 2. When the sub-blocks got worked out, this became Block2B.

    The USAF initially wanted the final SDD version for IOC but with all the delays and the capabilities of the software, the settled on 3i with some extra tweeks (newer Gen3 helmet, some ALIS improvements, etc).

    The basic 3i is the same feature set as 2B but it’s hosted on newer hardware. Once a plane is on Block3i, all the updates to get it to 3F are either software only or involve minor hardware updates.

    All F-35s are getting their Concurrency updates as the program matures and will be Block 3F by 2019 or so.

    After SDD is over and all F-35s are brought up to 3F, it will be up to each customer to update their F-35s to newer Blocks as they come out.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2166378
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Carrier Onboard Delivery :eagerness:

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168230
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I was talking about newly build airframes to fall back on, not just updated airframes.

    When was the last time the USAF bought an F-15/16?

    Yes, I agree the USMC is in the worst position, which is one of the reason why they were always planning on declaring IOC with a Block2 F-35.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168305
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The USN has the newest fleet, ie Superhornts, that can pick up the slack. The USAF and USMC have nothing to fall back on.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2169077
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    More CMs vs ISIS… what a waste.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2170989
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Looks like testing is done…

    http://aviationweek.com/awindefense/lightweight-tests-f-35-ejection-seats-completed

    Lightweight Tests Of F-35 Ejection Seats Completed

    Martin-Baker has completed testing of its F-35 escape system with lightweight dummies, and told a top U.S. Air Force official last month that a fixes designed to mitigate risk to the lightest fighter pilots are performing …

    If you have a sub, you can get more.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2172157
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I know… it was just another “coincidence” :eagerness:

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2172214
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Pure fantasy! …..

    A 60 second internet search shows that Mr Sweet is a general reporter, not an aviation specialist, and has worked for that newspaper for close to four decades.

    I was obviously joking 😎

    btw, A judge just ruled against Burlington in their lawsuit.

    A federal judge in Burlington has ruled that an environmental impact statement completed by the U.S. Air Force about basing F-35 fighter jets in Vermont complies with standards set by the National Environmental Policy Act, clearing the way for the planes’ arrival in 2019.

    http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2016/08/10/federal-judge-clears-way-f-35-basing/88535978/

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 4,849 total)