dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2332849
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Any idea of the range of SPEAR?

    100km+
    Remember that they are the same size as a SDB and will in fact use the same BRU-61.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-mbda-sharpens-spear-missile-design-for-f-35-integration-373453/

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2333024
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The difference is that the F-4 w/o a cannon was made without any combat experience to back it up.

    That is not the issue today as the US has 30+ years of VLO operations (20+ being combat exp).

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2333798
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F-35 cannot even carry those multiple AMRAAMs

    All F-35s can carry 2 AMRAAMs internal without sacrificing A2G munitions. Escort F-35s can carry 4-6 (Blk5 plan).

    contradictory to the concept of UAVs/UCAVs – it should be exactly vice versa!

    One of the problems with the Anti-fighter / pro-UCAV crowd is that they are quick to claim that some super sensor/weapon will make the manned fighter useless while ignoring the problems that UCAVs have like bandwidth limitations, SA limitations, non-existent AI, limited stores capability, susceptible to the same uber sensor/weapon that finds teh F-35, and the very high likelihood that a capable enemy will come up with a comms jammer that will break the command link.

    I suspect that is exactly the reason why Euros don’t bother throwing their money out of the window by developing a 5th gen design. A wise decision, IMHO.

    They saw how expensive it would be and how much it would cost to support over it’s lifetime (being a low build number) and rightly decided to join the JSF team. Strength in numbers.

    It takes guts to abandom some of the old schools values like speed, big loads and agility. For something… kind of unproven.

    Speed – When has a F-15E ever gone gone above mach 1.6 in combat?
    Big Loads – 18,000 pounds without sacrificing range due to loss of drop-tanks.
    Agility – It has F-16/18 class agility which is just fine.

    I would hardly call 30+ years of VLO operations and 20+ years of combat “unproven”.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334067
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    How exactly do serrated panel edges help you if you got this from behind?

    The only thing that will be seeing that view is another fighter at the same altitude. That being said, it would be the recipient of multiple AMRAAMs prior to the F-35 turning around.

    btw, that pic is AA-1 which lacks the serrated edges around the engine. Here is a shot of CF-01. Notice the extensive serrations around the engine.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/749f87b3.png

    If you need to drag a dozen of ECM and jammers to clean the way for the 35, then you could pretty much stay with upgraded F-16.

    Wrong, see PackageQ

    Heavy ECM (which the F-35 will eventually have natively) and decoys will only be needed for the most serious of enemy engagements for the F-35. ECM & Decoys would be needed for 4th gen assets just to get them even to the F-35 in ability. How do you propose to get 4th gen assets to the level of the F-35 that enjoys VLO RCS and ECM & Decoys?

    These both are max. 70-80nm range weapons (when launched from high altitudes at high speeds). Their practical range might be only marginally more than the already quoted 50 miles. A very poor example if you want to counter JASSM or TAURUS.

    The F-35 can easily get within range and survive to use a JSOW/SDB. Although not IOC, more internal weapons are on the way that will increase range such as JSOW-ER, Spear3, JDAM-ER. Besides, even an F-35 with JASSM or JSOW external would still be more survivable than any 4th gen asset with the same load.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334315
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Mission planning is much more than just knowing where the target is.

    btw, All the planning in the world won’t help you when you send the wrong (eg 4th gen) plane in to do the job (Package Q). After that, they left downtown Baghdad to the F-117.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334349
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    You don’t wanna seriously claim the F-35 with that huge circular crater being a V!LO

    I did not say that. What I said was that the RCS reduction measures, from any angle, are extensive and will lower the detection range significantly. For example, every panel edge is serrated (not just the engine nozzle), RAM as part of the structure (not just an applied paint), and extensive edge alignment.

    No mission planning can negate the huge disadvantage of being forced to approach close to the target you want to kill.

    Good mission planning means you tailor the package with the treat.

    Typhoons are perfectly capable to stay over 400km from the intended target and after releasing their KEPD they can easily disengage at will due to their superior kinematics – or stay and battle the incoming fighters if they choose.

    You are assuming that the Typhoon can safely get to the launch point and that the target is fixed.

    The F-35 becomes a 1st day of war tool only after the AGM-158 has been integrated. Of course, the JASSM will have to be carried externally thus compromising stealth – which pretty much defies the concept LM has been pushing for decades.

    You seem to be forgetting about JSOW and SDB, both of which allow for significant standoff range and are internal IOC weapons.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334435
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    2. F-35, too is only a partial first day of war fighter as it only features head-on aspect LO. In a large-scale war with a sophisticated enemy, the incoming F-35 aircraft would most likely be able to deliver their (quite limited) ordnance but quite unlikely to return.

    And this is based on what, APA guesstimations?

    The F-35 is just like any other VLO platform, its best RCS numbers are from the front, then rear, then sides. This is the classic bow-tie configuration. That being said, the F-35’s RCS reduction measures are all over the F-35 and would seriously degrade the radar detection range no matter what the detection angle.

    As far as the whole toss a couple 1k bombs and lose a pilot remark, you seem to be forgetting about mission planning and tactics. If they are attacking a well prepared enemy then they will likely have an extensive battleplan that includes route planning, standoff munitions, jammers, decoys, attacks against nearby airfields & SAM units, escorts, etc.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334946
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-15C reference is due to the pilot’s experience with that plane.

    33rd FW commander Col Andrew Toth, an F-15C Weapons School grad and former commander of the elite 57th Adversary Tactics Group at Nellis AFB, Nevada

    http://www.eglin.af.mil/library/biographies/bio.asp?id=14399

    FLIGHT INFORMATION:
    Rating: Command Pilot
    Flight Hours: More than 2,850 (339 in combat)
    Aircraft Flown: F-15A/B/C/D, T-37, T-38A/B/C

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2334995
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Those numbers are “estimated” values, not what has actually taken place.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2335033
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Look at the complete section of the quote:

    Getting to fly the F-35 for the first time was quite an experience, the aircraft was easy to fly and felt very solid. In my opinion, the aircraft flies like a cross between an Eagle and a Viper on steroids. Even with our current operating limits, it was smooth and quiet with differing airspeed when straight and level like a Viper. At the same time, the jet talks to you when you increase the angle of attack on it like an Eagle as you get a light buffet when flying at 12 units AOA. There is no doubt, as this aircraft matures and all of the systems become fully integrated, that it is the future of combat capability for our services and partner nations.

    It sounds like he is referencing different parts of the flight envelope and how it reminds him of the Viper in level flight (quick and quiet) and the Eagle (and how it speaks to him) in higher AoA.

    As far as the “On steroids” comment goes, I am inclined to think that he is commenting on acceleration, especially while fully fueled & armed.

    in reply to: F-35 Vs. PAK FA? #2335830
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    ПАК Фа по сумме параметров превосходит F-35:

    на Дальнем бою на 26%
    в тесном воздушного боя на 30%
    эффективность / стоимость превышает 47%
    успешности (нумерология), на 56%

    English?

    If you want, I can show you how to change the cell descriptions to match a specified language.

    in reply to: F-35 Vs. PAK FA? #2337171
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    He said F-35A 😉 . And yes, I am nitpicking 😀

    If you really want to nitpick, the title does not say A 😀 :rolleyes:

    in reply to: F-35 Vs. PAK FA? #2337347
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I cant think of one.

    1. STOVL
    2. CATOBAR

    😉

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2338658
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    No they do not. In fact, most SDD and all production F-35 have been produced without a pitot tube.

    Here is the lineup of AF-1,2,3,4,6 & 7 where 3, 6 & 7 do not have it.

    http://files.air-attack.com/MIL/jsf/f35a_lineup_edwards_20110901.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2338757
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=5091

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbSinROAtHI&feature=player_embedded

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/120808ogr159003.jpg

    NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md. – The F-35 Lightning II accomplished a significant test milestone Aug. 8 when the aircraft successfully released a weapon in flight.

    BF-3, a short take-off and vertical landing F-35 variant, released an inert 1,000-pound GBU-32 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) separation weapon over water in an Atlantic test range while traveling at 400 knots at an altitude of 4,200 feet.

    “While this weapons separation test is just one event in a series of hundreds of flights and thousands of test points that we are executing this year, it does represent a significant entry into a new phase of testing for the F-35 program,” said Navy Capt. Erik Etz, director of test for F-35 naval variants. “Today’s release of a JDAM was the result of extraordinary effort by our team of maintainers, engineers, pilots and others who consistently work long hours to deliver F-35 warfighting capability to the U.S. services and our international partners.”

    The release was the first time for any version of the F-35 to conduct an airborne weapon separation, as well as the first from an internal weapons bay for a fighter aircraft designated for the U.S. Marine Corps, the United Kingdom and Italy.
    The milestone marks the start of validating the F-35’s capability to employ precision weapons and allow pilots to engage the enemy on the ground and in the air.

    “[Using an internal weapons bay] speaks to how much capability the JSF is going to bring to the troops,” said Dan Levin, Lockheed Martin test pilot for the mission. “Stealth, fifth-generation avionics and precision weapons … coupled with the flexible mission capability of the short take-off and vertical landing F-35B is going to be huge for our warfighters.”

    An aerial weapons separation test checks for proper release of the weapon from its carriage system and trajectory away from the aircraft. It is the culmination of a significant number of prerequisite tests, including ground fit checks, ground pit drops and aerial captive carriage and environment flights to ensure the system is working properly before expanding the test envelope in the air.

    Aircraft and land-based test monitoring systems collected data from the successful separation, which is in review at the F-35 integrated test force at Naval Air Station Patuxent River.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,061 through 3,075 (of 4,849 total)