dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2344250
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Just a quick question that has been brewing in my mind – why don’t the USAF and other land based airforces use the F-35C? Are there such insurmountable differences between the two versions? Would it in fact save any money to drop the A version?

    Two main reasons:
    1. The F-35C costs $15-$20 million more than the A due to increased material usage.
    2. The F-35C is g limited.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2344252
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    No info available on any Israeli CFTs, but they are planning on developing a 600gal EFT.

    To carry the PWIV, Brimstone & successors and Storm Shadow at the same time, the PWIV or Brimstone would go internal (A2G station), the Storm Shadow would go on the inboard pylons and the the PWIV or Brimstone would take up the outbound pylon.

    As to how many missiles if ASRAAM is used, the final design has not been released so it is not known. The likely format will be 2 ASRAAMs and 2 AMRAAM/Meteors.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2344259
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Why waste internal space on a 9x when you could have an AMRAAM instead? Yes, an internal ASRAAM/9X would require a trapeze launcher which has been drawn up.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/InternalStores.jpg

    Brimsotne/JAGM internal numbers, nothing has been announced.

    Storm Shadow weighs 2700lb so it would take up the inside pylon (5000lb class) unless the outside pylon can be rated a little higher (currently 2500lb class). The JASSM weighs in at 2250lb so it can be carried on all external A2G pylons. JASSM also has a longer range than Storm Shadow.

    The UK’s 500lb LGB (even in F-35B) is slated for internal carriage and all 1000lb LGB and 2000lb LJDAMs should also fit the F-35A/C.

    in reply to: AAM shelf lives? #1793920
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    One of the other factors affecting “shelf life” is how the AAM is carried. Internally on the F-22/35/Pak-Fa/J-20 will allow for a longer life without the need for a rebuild due to a lot less stress put on the AAM.

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345507
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    A patent and a trademark are completely different things

    I never said they were the same, or even similar.

    patents in China are nothing like those in the USA.

    Of that I have no doubt. 😉

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345542
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Don’t forget, China is the PEOPLE’s republic and is a socialist country, so patents don’t work in China. Oh, and AVIC’s DSI has nothing to do with LM’s. They are the same solution, yes.

    LMAO.. sorry but that was just too funny.

    If China does not use patents, then why do they have a Patent Office?
    http://www.chinatrademarkoffice.com/

    btw, The LM DSI testbed was a mod of an existing F-16, not a new build.

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345548
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Do you even read your own links?

    I’ll summarize it for you – Sequence of events:
    1. “Research into the DSI was done by Lockheed Martin in the early 1990s.”
    2. “The first DSI was flown on 11 December 1996, installed on a F-16 Block 30 fighter” US Patents filed the same year.
    3. Two US Patents are granted in 1998.
    4. Either by seeing the patent info, seeing the F-16/DSI work or seeing early X-35 info, CAC decides to change the JF-17’s design to include DSI “Work on the DSI was started in 1999”.

    Such patents are absurd.

    Pretty much sums up China’s whole outlook on ANY patent.

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345570
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The two patents received for LM’s work on DSI filed in 1996 and granted in 1998.

    US Patent#’s 5779189 and 5749542

    btw, did China license the DSI tech or just “stand on the shoulders of giants”?

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345632
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Why are you trying so hard to give them credit where it is not due?

    Are the Wright Brothers not credited with the invention of the airplane even though is was just a “tech demonstrator”?

    Your own words betray you “JF-17 Prototype 06 is the first plane having DSI even though X-35 preceded it.”

    While the JF-17 is the first operational plane to have DSI, they are neither the inventors of DSI (LM) nor the first plane to fly with it (F-16/X-35).

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2345720
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    shure??

    The JF-17 prototypes were produced in two different versions. The first batch (PT-01, PT-02 and PT-03) contained a standard intake (as in your photo). The second batch (PT-04, PT-05, PT-06) had DSI.

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345927
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Again with the blurring of history? The X-35 flew YEARS before PT-06.

    in reply to: AVIC F-60, the Chinese F-22? #2345964
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Don’t you mean the F-35’s DSI? 😉

    in reply to: Rafale news XII #2346018
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Um, no. The toe-out of the pylons was to ensure safe separation of bombs & tanks.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2349092
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is the pilot of Vega-31 (the F-117 shot down) recounting the mission, shoot-down, and rescue:

    It is over an hour long.

    http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070613-031.mp3
    http://www.f-117a.com/Vega31/Vega31-1.html

    Takeaways:
    1. It was on egress, not ingress
    2. There were 16 F-177s (two groups of 8) that flew that night.
    3. Single-ship, no wingman
    4. No mention of warning or RwR
    5. Visually acquired the SAMs as they ascended through the low cloud layer (no mention of MLD or MAWS)
    6. First SAM overflew the F-117 but did not detonate via a proximity fuze.
    7. Second SAM detonated via proximity fuze.
    8. Full moon night
    9. Bright Orange and White parachute.. great for hiding from the enemy 🙂
    10. Actual mayday call recorded

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2349264
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    “IF”? Really?

    The F-22 was not deployed in Libya because it was not needed and the decision was made not to spend airframe hours on a mission where it cannot offer a substantial contribution.

    The primary purpose of the F-22 is as an Air Dominance Fighter and the Libya campaign was all about the Strikers.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 4,849 total)