dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,646 through 3,660 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2314278
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There is no GFE – Electronics in the price of the F-35 (look at the latest budget).

    JSF FY2012
    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/85201c7c.jpg

    F-18 FY2012
    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/9a15bb81.jpg

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2316577
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Of course it was rubbish. If there was any validity to it the presenter, NATO nation, and simulation scenario details would have been given.

    Considering that the “news” article author’s blog posts mostly sole-source the APA, I think that we can chalk this up to BS.

    On which NATO member, I found this:

    “The Luxembourg Army Marching Band is still puzzled why they were given an unsolicited brief on the JSF at their seminar.”

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2316947
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    While electronics and software may be the single largest portion of R&D, the same cannot be said for procurement. In the latest budget (FY2012) the cost (in Mil USD) breakdown for each F-35A was $80.89 (Airframe @ 67.1%), $25.86 (Electronics @ 21.5%) and $13.78 (Engine at 11.4%). In case you missed it, the airframe is 3 times more expensive than the electronics. Before you say “it’s a VLO/LRIP/new/etc”, the F/A-18E/F breakdown was 70%/12%/18% (airframe is 5.8 times more expensive than the electronics). Even in the Growler the breakdown is 56%/30%/14%.

    There has never, IIRC, been two fighters that shared the same software. Even the F-35 changed dramatically from the F-22. While there may be certain modules that are the same, the vast majority of software is different for each fighter.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2316976
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but your wrong. A very simple law of logistics is called “Economies of Scale“. If you have three different fighters (as such they would likely be manufactured by at least two different companies). That means different avionics, engines, radars, etc. All those different parts will cost more because they are produced in smaller batches in different timelines.

    btw, your argument that the F-35 will have higher lifetime cost due to it’s multi-role nature fails on it’s face due to the fact that the F/A-18, F-16, etc that it is replacing are already multi-role fighters. The F-35 is not inventing a new role, it’s just better at it that what it is replacing.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2317073
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The largest part of a fighter’s lifetime cost (including R&D and procurement) is sustainment. Having 3 different kinds of aircraft would have drove up sustainment costs significantly.

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Um, no. The 120D is nowhere near a SARH. The 120D can receive it’s updates not only from the firing F-35, but any F-35 within sensor range. Besides radar, those sensors could be the RwR, IRST, or EODAS.

    So no, you don’t have to fly directly towards the target.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2317733
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Cost is not a KPP and will not affect how the F-35 executes it’s mission. Neither the US nor any partner nation has reduced it’s order significantly as to affect their respective capability with the F-35. Nice try though 😉

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2318041
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    FUBAR, really?? What KPP has it not met. Before you say range, they still have a 5% SDD buffer that was not included that will put it over the top.

    Again, stopping production every time something comes up would have cost MORE to fix in the long run then to simply refurb the part later.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2318082
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There are a few things we do not know:
    1. When did the problem arise in stress testing?
    2. Did they continue the test to see the progression of the failure in order to make sure they knew the true cause and all parts affected?
    3. How long it took to study the info and design a new part and patch for refurbs?
    4. How many jets were produced from #2 through #4?
    5. What was the cost & time difference by either; A.Stopping production after #1 or B.Continue production schedule and plan on a patch for any planes produced while completing #2-#4?

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    So it seems the simpler, straightforward way to beating the F-22/F-35/other stealth fighters is jamming the AIM-120x/AAM variants into useless flying metal rods at close range.

    That applies to any AAM, at least the older generations. Newer versions, especially the 120D, are not so easy to fool. Besides their improvements in the ECCM field and HOJ functions, they sport a two-way datalink and GPS based INS.

    This allows the F-22/35/etc to guild the 120D until it is very close to the target before the 120D goes active. Without the active seeker of the 120D, the target has nothing to jam until the last moments before impact. Even if the target starts effective jamming, the 120D will still have it’s datalink and INS that can continue to prosecute the mission till it’s seeker can burn through the jamming.

    This type of defense against an AAM will get even tougher once the NGM (aka JDRADM) comes online with it’s tri-mode seeker (EM, IR, & HARM).

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2318411
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Being a little tad “chicken little” don’t you think? Despite what some might think, fighter design is not a perfect science. That is why there is a SDD phase. What is different this time is the LRIP phase taking place at the same time as SDD. The DoD requested this in order to save time and avoid a “fighter gap”.

    As to why they kept producing F-35s after the crack was found, it would have cost more to halt & restart production than to simply refurb the new rib as part of a later upgrade process (likely Blk3).

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2318759
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    DR = Dual Role (ie A2G and A2A)

    in reply to: new Northrop YF-23 website #2319399
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-23 was to have two bays, one large (rear) and one forward (smaller).

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F22/f2351.jpg

    in reply to: Su-15TM vs F-4E #2320069
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Don’t forget the balloons 😉

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2320871
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Cleared for flight, not sure if they have taken to the air yet.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,646 through 3,660 (of 4,849 total)